Matzav

The International Criminal Court’s Appeals Chamber has overturned a prior decision by a lower court that dismissed Israel’s objection to the court’s jurisdiction in a case involving the Jewish state. The appellate judges determined that the lower chamber mishandled the matter and have now returned it for reconsideration.

Israel initially challenged the court’s legal standing to preside over the case, asserting that the ICC lacked jurisdiction. That challenge was rejected by the Pre-Trial Chamber, which claimed it was premature to address the issue. In response, Israel filed an appeal.

On Thursday, the Appeals Chamber ruled that the Pre-Trial Chamber erred by failing to fully examine Israel’s jurisdictional claims. The appellate body overturned the earlier decision and directed the lower chamber to re-evaluate and issue a proper ruling on the ICC’s authority in the case.

Following this development, the Appeals Chamber also dismissed Israel’s separate request to freeze existing arrest warrants and other legal measures tied to the initial ruling. The chamber reasoned that with the jurisdictional question reopened, the request had become irrelevant.

Additionally, Israel had asked the court to compel the Prosecutor to issue a revised notification concerning the investigation. That motion was denied by the Pre-Trial Chamber and subsequently appealed. However, the Appeals Chamber threw out that appeal as well, stating it did not meet the threshold for consideration. Two of the judges dissented from this decision.

Reacting to the court’s ruling, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar reaffirmed Israel’s stance: “We said it from the start: The International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) doesn’t have, and never had jurisdiction to issue arrest warrants against Israel’s Prime Minister and its former Minister of Defense. Israel is not a member of the ICC and is not party to the ‘Rome Statute.’ The ICC Appeals Court instructed the Court today, to do what it should have done from the start: to make a determination with respect to jurisdiction. On this topic, there is only one correct answer: the Court has no jurisdiction over Israel. The warrants were issued unlawfully. They are null and void.”

{Matzav.com}

National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir was originally slated to deliver a speech this coming Shabbos at the Young Israel of Woodmere in Long Island, New York.

Today, the shul, which boasts more than 2,500 members, announced that the event would no longer take place.

No official explanation was issued by the shul, but individuals close to the minister indicated that the rov who was supposed to host the gathering experienced a petirah in his family, which led to the cancellation.

There has not yet been any update on what alternate plans Ben Gvir may have made for his time in the United States.

Earlier in the week, on Wednesday night, Ben Gvir spoke at Yale University, addressing an audience of students and faculty. As he exited the venue, he was confronted by demonstrators critical of Israel, who shouted slogans and threw water bottles. In response, Ben Gvir stood his ground and raised his hand in a “V” sign for victory.

“The minister is doing well and was not injured,” stated a spokesperson for Ben Gvir.

Ben Gvir’s U.S. visit began in Miami, Florida, where he was the guest of honor at a private dinner attended by numerous high-level business figures.

That gathering took place at Mar-a-Lago, the Florida estate of US President Donald Trump. During the event, Ben Gvir was asked to address Republican lawmakers, including Senators and members of Congress. He was met with a warm reception and spoke extensively.

While at Mar-a-Lago, Ben Gvir also met with Congressman Tom Emmer. In their discussion, Ben Gvir emphasized the importance of targeting Hamas’ food supply caches. Emmer replied that he is keeping up with Ben Gvir’s efforts and backs his stance.

{Matzav.com}

In a bold economic initiative aimed at crippling Hamas’ financial infrastructure in Gaza, Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar has formally urged Bank of Israel Governor Prof. Amir Yaron to take unprecedented action: remove the legal tender designation from specific 200 Shekel banknotes.

This dramatic proposal is part of a wider strategy to disrupt Hamas’ access to liquid funds, which Sa’ar said forms the core of its operational strength in the region. He noted that billions of shekels in physical cash fuel Hamas’ activities in Gaza.

Sa’ar emphasized that these particular bills are frequently used by Hamas to pay salaries to its operatives and to enforce financial control over the local economy by extracting “taxes” from business owners. He cited data gathered by a team of voluntary financial experts who determined that roughly 80% of the cash circulating in Gaza consists of 200 shekel notes.

“Denying the financing capacity of terrorist organizations in general and Hamas, in particular, is a vital pillar of the war effort,” Sa’ar stated in his letter.

He went on to argue that withdrawing a certain series of 200 shekel bills—especially those that were funneled into Gaza in recent years—could deliver a “strategic economic blow” to Hamas, severely impairing its administrative capabilities and its ability to recruit members.

{Matzav.com}

Egypt is reportedly preparing to unveil a fresh outline for a potential ceasefire and hostage exchange agreement between Israel and Hamas, according to a report published Thursday by Asharq News, a Saudi-owned outlet. The report, citing sources familiar with the talks, stated the new plan is expected to be formally submitted to both sides before the end of the week.

The sources indicated that this updated framework attempts to accommodate key conditions set forth by both parties. Described as a “balanced” approach, the proposal aims to lay the groundwork for a multi-year cessation of hostilities, possibly extending for a period of five to seven years.

To support the implementation of the deal, regional and international powers would provide oversight and guarantees to ensure that both Israel and Hamas adhere to the agreed terms, according to the report.

The formulation of this proposal is said to have been the result of a collaborative effort involving Egypt, Qatar, and the United States, the report added. These parties have reportedly been working in tandem to develop a package capable of stabilizing the region.

As soon as the main parameters of the agreement are finalized, all active military engagements are expected to stop, sources said. “Once a framework agreement is reached, the ground situation will be restored and all military operations will be halted.”

They further noted that aid deliveries would resume in accordance with international guidelines. “Humanitarian and relief aid will be introduced according to the international protocol,” the sources continued.

As detailed in the report, the arrangement would see the release of Israeli hostages in exchange for a negotiated number of Palestinian detainees, with both sides expected to agree on the final figures.

The report further underscored that the deal’s implementation would hinge on several key conditions: “contingent on an immediate and complete ceasefire, a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, the initiation of the Gaza reconstruction process, and the lifting of the blockade imposed since 2007.”

In return, Israel would demand Hamas commit to a five-year ceasefire and relinquish its administrative control over the Gaza Strip, according to the sources cited.

The report coincides with reports that an Israeli team is slated to travel soon for negotiations aimed at securing a hostage release deal, according to information shared with The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday.

Despite this development, insiders told the Post that Hamas has not altered its demands and remains firm in its position.

Mediators from Egypt and Qatar were informed by Hamas that “we will not agree to a deal that includes a temporary ceasefire.”

Israel, on the other hand, remains clear in its stance: it will only consent to a deal involving the release of 10 to 11 hostages in exchange for a 45-day truce. Prime Minister Netanyahu reiterated that Israel “will not agree to cease the war,” rejecting Hamas’s demand for a permanent halt to military action.

{Matzav.com Israel}

A fast-spreading wildfire in New Jersey has sent plumes of smoke across the greater New York City region, disrupting air quality and triggering health advisories on Thursday. The fire’s suspected origin has led to the arrest of a young man accused of starting the blaze.

Authorities in Ocean County announced that 19-year-old Joseph Kling, a resident of Waretown, is facing multiple charges, including aggravated arson. Prosecutors allege that Kling ignited the fire in the vicinity of Jones Road and Bryant Road in Ocean Township, with officials pointing to a “bonfire that was not properly put out” as the cause.

“Further investigation has revealed that Kling was the individual responsible for setting wooden pallets on fire – and then leaving the area without the fire being fully extinguished,” the New Jersey Forest Fire Service said.

Kling is currently in custody at the Ocean County Jail, while fire crews continue to battle the large blaze. As of Thursday, the fire had scorched more than 15,000 acres and was only half contained, according to emergency officials.

The smoke from the wildfire has triggered elevated pollution levels across New York City and neighboring counties including Nassau, Suffolk, Rockland, and Westchester. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation issued warnings about air quality, urging residents to take precautions.

The agency noted that staying indoors could help minimize exposure to smoke-related issues like irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, along with respiratory symptoms such as coughing and shortness of breath.

On Thursday morning, a subtle smokiness hung over Midtown Manhattan, with forecasters predicting that air conditions would deteriorate as the day progressed.

Emergency Management Commissioner Zachary Iscol told 1010 WINS that Air Quality Index levels were projected to climb into the “Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups” range, possibly reaching an AQI of 101.

“We have masks that you can pick up, which are available at local precincts and public libraries,” Iscol said. “And again, if you’re experiencing any symptoms like shortness of breath, dizziness, chest pain—please make sure to seek medical attention. Don’t take any chances.”

Up-to-date AQI information is available at AirNow.gov.

The event has drawn comparisons to the Canadian wildfire smoke that blanketed New York City in June 2023, when the AQI soared to a record-setting 484, casting an eerie orange glow over the skyline.

This time, smoke is being carried in from the southeast by wind patterns, according to AccuWeather. Though not as intense as the 2023 incident, the smoke may still cause hazy skies and limited visibility, along with further deterioration in air quality.

Despite the smoky haze, forecasters said Thursday would be mostly sunny, with scattered clouds and a high temperature near 74 degrees in the city.

Officials reported that the wildfire had expanded to over 20 square miles and might continue burning for several more days. While there have been no reported injuries, around 5,000 residents had to evacuate but were later allowed to return. The fire has destroyed one commercial property and several vehicles, while a dozen structures remained at risk as of Wednesday night.

“This is still a very active fire,” said New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection Commissioner Shawn LaTourette. “As we continue to get this under full control the expectation is that the number of acres will grow and will grow in a place that is unpopulated.”

The Ocean County Sheriff’s Office issued a separate warning early Thursday, stating that smoky conditions would persist and that emergency teams would remain on scene for the coming days.

Meanwhile, New York State has issued a high fire danger alert for multiple regions due to dry conditions, affecting New York City, Long Island, the Hudson Valley, the Capital Region, and parts of the North Country. Other areas are under moderate to low fire risk.

Officials say this wildfire ranks as the second most destructive in New Jersey in the past twenty years, with the largest being a 2007 inferno that consumed 26 square miles.

Acting Governor Tahesha Way signed a state of emergency declaration on Wednesday. Emergency responders have so far managed to contain about half of the wildfire’s spread.

Footage shared by the state’s fire agency revealed a dramatic scene: thick clouds of smoke billowing into the sky, flames engulfing tall pine trees, and crews working to extinguish the blaze as it consumed a heavily scorched structure.

{Matzav.com}

In a powerful reiteration of his support for Torah-oriented engagement with the World Zionist Organization (WZO), HaGaon Rav Avrohom Gurwicz, Rosh Yeshivas Gateshead, has released an updated endorsement, urging all shomrei Torah umitzvos to register and vote for the Eretz HaKodesh party in the current WZO elections.

The new statement, dated today, 26 Nissan 5785, follows and builds upon a foundational letter issued by Rav Gurwicz earlier, in which he echoed the directive of Gedolei Yisroel—Rav Chaim Kanievsky zt”l and Rav Shmuel Kamenetsky shlit”a—emphasizing the critical importance of Torah Jewry having a voice in decisions affecting Eretz Yisroel through the WZO.

“Now that elections have been called with the opportunity to elect representatives who will have the authority to decide the future direction of the World Zionist Organisation,” Rav Gurwicz wrote in his latest addendum today, “it is a matter of obligation to register and vote in these elections for the Eretz Hakodesh party.”

The original letter, written on Rosh Chodesh Iyar 5782 and reaffirmed in Adar II of this year, explained the immense influence wielded by the WZO over developments in Eretz Yisroel, and called on Torah Jews to take responsibility by joining the Eretz HaKodesh movement. This, Rav Gurwicz stated, would grant the Torah community “a deciding say in the appointments of the leaders of the World Zionist Organization,” thereby helping to promote kavod haTorah and “at the very least, to prevent its desecration.”

Rav Gurwicz noted that his prior letter “still retains its validity,” and with the opening of the voting period, it was necessary to reemphasize the obligation to act.

Below is the letter containing Rav Gurwicz’s latest statement, penned today:

Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., encouraged President Donald Trump to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities rather than wasting time trying to negotiate with “that kind of regime.”

Trump has said repeatedly that Iran cannot acquire nuclear weapons. Late last week, he said he was in no hurry to launch an attack over the issue.

Fetterman told The Washington Free Beacon that Trump should forget trying to negotiate with Iranian leaders and take out the Middle Eastern country’s nuclear facilities.

“Waste that ….,” Fetterman told the Free Beacon on Wednesday. “You’re never going to be able to negotiate with that kind of regime that has been destabilizing the region for decades already, and now we have an incredible window, I believe, to do that, to strike and destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities.”

It was reported Wednesday that Iran has agreed to allow in an International Atomic Energy Agency technical team in the coming days to discuss restoring camera surveillance at nuclear sites, the head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog said, calling it an encouraging signal of Iran’s attitude toward nuclear talks with the U.S.

Such news likely did not impress Fetterman, who dismissed the possibility that a military strike on Iran would lead to a regional war.

“And remember, all of these so-called experts were all wrong,” he said. “You know, they’ve been saying for years and years Hezbollah was the ultimate …. that kept Israel in check, and we can’t move on anything beyond that.”

However, the Iranian proxy group “couldn’t fight for ….,” he said. “And Hamas, literally, are just a bunch of tunnel rats with junkie rockets in the back of a Toyota truck. And now the Houthis have been effectively neutered as well. So what’s left? You have Iran, and they have a nuclear facility, and it’s clearly only for weapons.”

Fetterman commended Trump for pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, three years after then-President Barack Obama agreed to it.

“Years ago, I completely understood why Trump withdrew from the Obama deal,” Fetterman told the Free Beacon. “Today, I can’t understand why Trump would negotiate with this diseased regime. The negotiations should be comprised of 30,000-pound bombs and the IDF.”

Fetterman’s remarks to the Free Beacon echoed what he said last month during his second trip to Israel in the past year.

“I don’t think you can really effectively negotiate with that regime,” he said, Jewish News Syndicate reported.

Pressed further, he said, “Oh yeah. Blow it up! Blow it up! I think we should waste what’s left of their nuclear facilities.”

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump sharply criticized Harvard University in response to its president’s remarks defending free speech amidst accusations of unchecked antisemitism on campus. After Harvard’s president Alan Garber spoke out against the Trump administration’s move to freeze over $2 billion in federal funding, Trump responded with a blistering statement, branding the institution as a haven for radical ideologies. “Harvard is an antisemitic, far-left Institution, as are numerous others, with students being accepted from all over the world that want to rip our country apart,” Trump posted on Truth Social. “The place is a liberal mess, allowing a certain group of crazed lunatics to enter and exit the classroom and spew fake anger and hate.” He continued, “It is truly horrific!”

Garber, acknowledging the rise in antisemitic incidents at Harvard since the October 7 Hamas attack on Israel, nonetheless defended the university’s stance. In an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt, he said, “We are defending what I believe is one of the most important linchpins of the American economy and way of life — our universities.” Garber explained that despite recognizing the seriousness of the issue, he felt obligated to push back against what he saw as politically motivated interference in academic independence.

Trump, however, dismissed Harvard’s stance as hypocritical and dangerous. He accused the university of pretending to change only after being pressured. “Now, since our filings began, they act like they are all ‘American Apple Pie,’” he wrote. “Harvard is a threat to democracy, with a lawyer who represents me, who should therefore be forced to resign, immediately, or be fired.”

According to reporting from The Harvard Crimson, the university filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration over the funding freeze, with its legal team including Robert Hur and William Burck. Hur previously served in Trump’s Department of Justice, while Burck once represented The Trump Organization. Trump commented on Burck’s role in the suit with a parting shot: “He’s not that good, anyway, and I hope that my very big and beautiful company, now run by my sons, gets rid of him ASAP!”

In a detailed letter dated April 11, the Trump administration had called on Harvard to overhaul its leadership and admissions systems, conduct an internal review of its diversity programs, and cease recognition of certain student groups. The administration also demanded structural reforms as a condition for restoring frozen federal research funds.

Harvard’s lawsuit, filed Monday, challenged the legality of the freeze, arguing that there was no legitimate link between the university’s handling of antisemitism and the research projects affected by the funding suspension. “The government has not — and cannot — identify any rational connection between antisemitism concerns and the medical, scientific, technological and other research it has frozen that aims to save American lives, foster American success, preserve American security and maintain America’s position as a global leader in innovation,” the complaint stated. It further warned that halting billions in federal support could gravely damage scientific advancement and national competitiveness.

But the administration quickly issued a forceful rebuttal. In a statement Monday night, White House spokesperson Harrison Fields made it clear that the days of unchecked federal funding for elite universities were over. “The gravy train of federal assistance to institutions like Harvard, which enrich their grossly overpaid bureaucrats with tax dollars from struggling American families, is coming to an end,” Fields said. “Taxpayer funds are a privilege, and Harvard fails to meet the basic conditions required to access that privilege.”

Meanwhile, legal experts are already weighing in. Harvard Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax that the law was likely on Trump’s side in this confrontation. “Harvard’s going to lose,” he said during an appearance on “The Record With Greta Van Susteren.” “It has no obligation legally, the government, to fund a $53 billion university. I don’t understand the basis of the lawsuit.”

Dershowitz emphasized that while Harvard has the right to free speech and academic freedom, that does not entitle it to federal dollars. “They’re claiming First Amendment. But, you know, Harvard has the First Amendment right to speak and to teach and academic freedom, but it doesn’t have the right to get funding.”

He suggested the legal maneuvering might be strategic. “I think the lawsuit is designed to send a message to the administration: Come sit down and negotiate. Their two lawyers who they hired initially are negotiators; they’re close to the Trump family and Trump business. And I think this is simply a ploy to try to get a resolution.”

{Matzav.com}

On Tuesday, April 22, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Mahmoud, et. al. v. Taylor, et. al., a case about public school parents’ right to have their children “opt out” of certain curriculum that does not comport with the parents’ religious beliefs. Legal experts note that the case could have important implications for yeshivos and other nonpublic schools as well.

The Mahmoud case was filed by parents of public school students in Montgomery County, Washington, D. C. who objected to the inclusion of books and other materials that contained morally objectionable themes in the curriculum of their children’s schools. The District Court and United States Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit declined to allow the objecting parents the right to be notified in advance regarding the objectionable materials so that their children could opt out of participating in class when those materials were being taught. Despite these setbacks, the parents pressed on, and the Supreme Court agreed to take their case.

Agudath Israel of America, along with other religious advocacy groups, filed an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief in the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower court rulings disregard a long line of caselaw that gives parents the right to direct the upbringing – and particularly the educational upbringing — of their children.

Moreover, amici argued that the lower courts’ determination that the government is permitted to utilize its resources — in this case, the public school system — without regard to parents’ religious concerns, is contrary to recent Supreme Court decisions that require sensitivity to the Free Exercise Clause and generally prohibit government resources from being withheld from sectarian institutions.

“This case is not just about public schools,” said Rabbi Chaim Dovid Zwiebel, Executive Vice President of Agudath Israel of America. “In light of the ongoing efforts in certain jurisdictions to dictate what must be learned in yeshivos and other nonpublic schools, and by whom it must be taught, there is a lot riding on the outcome of this case. We look forward to a reaffirmation by the nation’s highest court that parents are the ultimate decision-makers when it comes to their children’s education.”

Agudath Israel’s general counsel, Daniel I. Kaminetsky, Esq., added: “Agudath Israel has always been vigilant to protect the rights of all individuals to freely exercise their religion. The government’s position in the Mahmoud case is yet another attempt to erode the religious rights guaranteed by our Constitution. That erosion must be stopped.”

Agudath Israel thanks Steven T. McFarland and Laura Nammo of the Center for Law and Religious Freedom, the Christian Legal Society and Eric Treene and Roman P. Storzer of Storzer and Associates, for their leading role in drafting the amicus brief.

{Matzav.com}

[Full explosive leaked WhatsApp details below.] In a revelation that will send shockwaves throughout the chareidi world, it has come to light that senior members of the Conservative movement have been secretly orchestrating a campaign to sway public opinion and even influence daas Torah within the heart of the chareidi community, using deception, subterfuge, and substantial financial incentives.

According to leaked WhatsApp conversations and internal correspondence obtained in a follow-up investigation by Kikar HaShabbat, Conservative officials, including high-ranking figures in the movement’s global apparatus, plotted to funnel money into targeted ad campaigns, publish street posters and pashkevilim, and even offer payment in exchange for rabbinic signatures and endorsements.

The goal?

To undermine the Eretz HaKodesh slate and influence outcomes in the World Zionist Organization elections, all while pretending to be “insiders” in the chareidi world.

The deceit has been layered and carefully crafted. Conservative officials used code names, false identities, and messaging designed to appear authentically chareidi, all to gain credibility and push their anti-Eretz HaKodesh messaging into the streets of Bnei Brak, Yerushalayim, and the United States. The newly uncovered materials reveal a calculated effort to mask their involvement at every step, with instructions to campaigners to “never reveal the client” and to fabricate identities, such as falsely claiming to be “former talmidim of Rav Landau seeking to protect his honor.”

The Secret WhatsApp Group of Senior Conservative Officials

The attempts by the Conservative movement to meddle in the chareidi public are now fully exposed. In a continuation of Kikar HaShabbat’s earlier investigation that sparked widespread outrage in Israel and abroad, the news outlet has now revealed the full WhatsApp exchanges behind the campaign led by a senior representative of the Conservative movement and his assistant. They sought to run a major campaign within the chareidi world, both in Israel and globally, involving themselves in every detail, while continuously hiding their involvement and covering their tracks.

After Kikar HaShabbat published its investigation into the campaign run by the Conservative movement to sway public opinion in the chareidi street, dozens of shocked responses poured in, some even sharing new information about the movement’s activities. The revelations included that the Conservative operatives spared no effort in trying to harm the Eretz HaKodesh party and tarnish its name amongst the chareidi public.

As was reported, the Merkaz Olami organization of the Conservative movement funded the entire campaign of posters plastered throughout chareidi neighborhoods attacking Eretz HaKodesh and the World Zionist Organization. The organization and its representatives declined to comment—but did not deny the report.

Now, Kikar HaShabbat has revealed another chapter: explosive WhatsApp exchanges within a group chat involving Yizhar Hess, a senior Conservative figure who serves as Deputy Chair of the World Zionist Organization, and his chief of staff, Eyal Ostrinsky, a former Labor party member known as the mastermind behind many progressive campaigns in Zionist institutions. In the chats, they coordinate every part of the campaign, while carefully hiding their role.

At the same time, Hess tweets publicly about his supposed partnership with members of Eretz HaKodesh and praises them, while behind the scenes he directs a targeted smear campaign, planting posters and pashkevilim against them in their own neighborhoods.

“When you get a personal flyer in front of your home, and the neighbors see it, it’s more effective,” he says.

In the WhatsApp exchanges, the deep involvement of Hess and Ostrinsky in the negative campaign against Eretz HaKodesh is clearly visible, utilizing street ads, pashkevilim, social media posts, and even ad placement in American chareidi publications under disguised funding sources.

From the messages, it’s clear that not only did the money come directly from the Conservative movement, but Hess and Ostrinsky were personally involved in writing the ads, formulating the messages against Eretz HaKodesh and the World Zionist Organization, and choosing locations, specifically near the homes of Eretz HaKodesh leaders, for maximum personal and communal pressure.

WHATSAPP CONVERSATION EXCERPTS

Selected Messages from the Leaked Conversations:

Campaigner: I’ve moved on to the Litvishe rabbanim scene in the U.S.

Ostrinsky: Excellent.

Campaigner: Rav Kotler and a few others. It’s being checked. I’ll have answers tomorrow.

Ostrinsky: They should see what Rav Landau wrote.

Campaigner: In the U.S., do you want them to back Rav Landau’s statement or issue an independent one with the same message?

Ostrinsky: If they join Rav Landau, wouldn’t that be more powerful?

Campaigner: Yes. But if we do separate letters, we can get two newspaper ads. More exposure.

A few days later, the campaigner presented a potential list of rabbanim in Israel willing to sign against Eretz HaKodesh. He shared a price sheet and engaged in a cost-benefit analysis with Conservative representatives, calculating each name’s influence and worth. The conversation also referenced other partners working behind the scenes through additional, unexposed channels.

Campaigner:

• Rav Shimon Galei
• Rav Mordechai Gross
• Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein
• Rav Mordechai Bunim Zilberberg
• Rav Koledetzky
• Rav Dovid Cohen
• Rav Eliezer Yehuda Finkel
• Rav Aviezer Piltz
• Rav Yigal Rosen

Total: 35,000 NIS

Campaigner: Litvishe rabbanim, second tier in Israel.

Around 4,000 per name.

Ostrinsky: I’m checking the names.

Ostrinsky: Koledetzky — is he the son-in-law of Rav Chaim Kanievsky?

Campaigner: Yes. This is a tentative list. No guarantee they’ll all agree.

Ostrinsky: Rav Mordechai Gross is interesting. He heads the bais din in Paris.

Ostrinsky: Maybe he’s more relevant to France?

Campaigner: He leans toward the Yerushalmi Faction. Might work with him. Not sure of his stance on Eretz HaKodesh.

Hess: I don’t recognize many of these names.

Hess: This is a crazy price, isn’t it?

Campaigner: Because it’s a lot of rabbanim. But we don’t need all of them.

Hess: Still, maybe the volume is worth it?

Campaigner: I’ll ask how much he wants for the ones we actually need. But yes, the price is wild. Your call.

Hess: Try to negotiate.

Hess: What do you think?

Campaigner: If we drop Rav Zilberstein and go with Galei, Koledetzky, Cohen, and Gross — he’ll do it for 20. Based on difficulty.

Campaigner: Koledetzky is also Rav Kanievsky’s son-in-law.

Hess: Is Zilberstein important?

Campaigner: Sorry, Zilberstein is his brother-in-law, and Koldetzky is the son-in-law.

Campaigner: I asked about price again. Apparently, the “cake” is too big — too many people need a slice. He claims he can’t go lower.

Hess: Maybe pay per signature to motivate? If he comes back with 3–4 unimpactful names, what’s the point?

Campaigner: Exactly. One signature — 5K.

Hess: Who are the most important names?

Campaigner: Galei is like the Ashkenazi “baba” — huge in America. Gross, you said, is big in France.

Hess: You’ve got the green light. Good luck.

Ostrinsky: Also Dovid Cohen.

Ostrinsky: Finkel is a Moetzes member too. Try him.

Campaigner: What’s the budget? 25? 20?

Ostrinsky: You’re not getting more than 4–5 names, right?

Ostrinsky: So yeah.

Campaigner: Who are the top four you want him to try?

Ostrinsky: The ones you listed. Just swap Gross for Dovid Cohen.

A few days later, the topic resurfaced, now with a push to have rabbanim sign Rav Dov Landau’s letter. Yizhar Hess remained actively involved, constantly checking in.

Campaigner: He wants the original letter, but Rav Landau’s house isn’t giving it to me. Trying to get it.

The next day:

Hess: What’s happening with the letters?

Campaigner: We got to Rav Landau’s driver. He’s willing to help and reach out to other rabbanim — if we tell him who’s really behind this. We’re stalling. Let’s see if it works.

The day after:

Hess: Any update on the letters?

Campaigner: I just messaged him — waiting for a reply.

Later it became clear that the original letter wouldn’t be released, making it harder to get additional rabbanim to sign onto the version printed publicly. Hess kept pressing.

Campaigner: Rav Landau’s house doesn’t want to release the original letter. Big problem. That’s what the intermediary says.

Hess: But does anyone actually doubt its authenticity?

The campaigner shared a voice message from someone close to Rav Galei, saying they showed him the published letter from Yated Ne’eman and he refused to address it under such circumstances.

Campaigner: Listen when you have a chance.

Hess: I listened.

Later, the campaigner posted a link to a video shared on Dvir Amar’s X account, showing Rav Dov Landau opposing voting for Eretz HaKodesh and the World Zionist Organization.

Campaigner: [link]

Campaigner: Wow. Who’s behind this?

Hess: No idea. Interesting.

A new tactic emerged: targeting rabbanim from the Syrian (Halabi) community in the U.S. with a letter against participating in the World Zionist Organization elections. Hess’s response hinted at others working behind the scenes for him.

Campaigner: Someone told me that the Syrian community in the U.S. votes for Eretz HaKodesh. I’m checking how big it is. Maybe we can try a Sephardi rabbanim letter? Easier than Ashkenazim. Worth exploring?

Hess: It’s being handled.

Hess: No.

*******************************

Campaigner:
“Should we start posting flyers near Gafni and Litov?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Eyal?”

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Do we have a cost estimate for that?”

Campaigner:
“Yes.”
(Attaches pricing breakdown)

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Both of those look reasonable to me.”

Campaigner:
“Tuesday coming up, or Thursday night next week?
When do we start?”

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Next Thursday, in my opinion.”

Campaigner:

(Thumbs up)

At this stage, Hess and Ostrinsky await the final wording of the ad for approval, emphasizing the need to conceal their identity. They begin a long discussion about personal attacks on Shmuel Litov and his aide, Eliyahu Gafni, son of MK Moshe Gafni.

Campaigner:
“Initial draft of the flyer text.”
(File attached)
“Before proofreading, etc.
Your thoughts?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Great text.”
“Waiting.”
“And obviously, don’t reveal who the client is.”
“Let’s just say we’re former talmidim of Rav Landau who want to protect his kavod.”

Campaigner:
“Of course :)”

Yizhar Hess:
“What about Litov?
Gafni and his son?”

Campaigner:
“I wasn’t sure.
Do we do all three together?
Whatever you want.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Not sure.
Eyal, what do you think?”

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Together.”

Campaigner:
“Great.
On it.”

Yizhar Hess:
“And all this right before Shabbos.”

Campaigner:
“Most likely Thursday night.
At night.
Thursday night.”

Yizhar Hess:
“So they’ll take them down Friday morning, no?”

Campaigner:
“No.
In my previous campaigns, they weren’t removed.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Cool.”
“This is for all four—Pindrus, Litov, Gafni Sr., and Gafni Jr.?”

Campaigner:
“Yes, I added them.”

They discuss ad pricing based on quotes from Bnei Brak and Yerushalayim. Hess asks whether the prices include getting popular chareidi Twitter influencers to post photos of the ads.

Campaigner:
“Tweets are separate, but it’s cheap.”

Yizhar Hess:
“How much approximately?”

Campaigner:
“No more than 1,000 shekels.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Ok.”
“Say, wouldn’t it be better to do 4 separate flyers? One for each person?”
“Doesn’t it make the message stronger when it’s personal?”

Campaigner:
“Definitely possible,
But it increases costs.
Want me to check price?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Yes. Check.”
“When you get a personal flyer in front of your house and neighbors, it’s more effective.”

They continue discussing the wording and how to make the ad appear authentically chareidi.

Campaigner:
“Should we include their photos in the flyer?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Not sure. What’s standard? What looks most authentic to this community? What’s the norm today?”
“What would supporters of Rav Landau likely do?”

Campaigner:
“Without.
We’ll do without.”
“Do you want two different texts? Or use the same one and just tweak it for each target?”

Yizhar Hess:
“I think two different texts is better.”

Campaigner:
“Okay.
On it.”

Yizhar Hess:
“And the one for Litov—make that one the strongest.”

Campaigner:
“LOL, got it.”

Yizhar Hess:
“And Gafni—focus on the son.”

Campaigner:
“Not both together?”

Yizhar Hess:
“No, no—both Gafnis together.”

Campaigner:
(Sends two different versions of the flyers)
“These are two separate drafts.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Go for it!”

Campaigner:
“Any comments or suggestions?”

Yizhar Hess:
“I’m not worthy.
Just make sure it’s written in authentic chareidi style.”
(Files attached)

Campaigner:
“Can you approve both of these for me quickly?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Approved.”

Campaigner:
(Thumbs up)

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Looks excellent.”

After the flyers are posted in the streets, the group awaits complementary posts from chareidi Twitter influencers who will post photos of the signs targeting members of Eretz HaKodesh. In the meantime, Ostrinsky briefs the team on the salary details of Eretz HaKodesh personnel in KKL.

Campaigner:
“What exactly is Eliyahu Gafni’s role?”

Yizhar Hess:
“He’s the personal assistant to the Vice Chairman of KKL, Shmuel Litov.
21,000 shekels + car.”

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“He doesn’t have a car.
It’s just a salary of 21,000 shekels.”

Campaigner:
“Okay, not critical.”

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Still, a very respectable salary, but best not to get the details wrong.”

After the Israeli campaign, the team begins planning for another round, this time targeting chareidi areas in the United States with anti-Eretz HaKodesh and anti-WZO messaging.

Yizhar Hess:
“[Name redacted.] What about placing ads in Yated Ne’eman and Mishpacha in the U.S.?”

Campaigner:
“The office requested price quotes. I’ll check what happened with that.”

A few days later…

Campaigner:
“There’s a guy putting up posters in Boro Park.
Is that useful for us? Do they have voters there?
Same style of posters as in Eretz Yisroel.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Wonderful.”

Campaigner:
“What other neighborhoods/cities should we target in the New York area?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Lakewood.”
“Five Towns.”

Campaigner:
“Okay.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Rockaway.
Though Boro Park is more Chassidish than Litvish.
They don’t vote?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Less so.
Eretz HaKodesh is stronger with Litvaks, if I understand correctly.”

Campaigner:
“Okay.”

(Ad file and U.S. pricing quote attached)

Campaigner:
“There will be one more small expense for graphics and an English copywriter, I believe.”

Yizhar Hess:
“And who can write the appropriate ad?
We need someone who speaks American Litvishe chareidi language.”

Campaigner:
“I’ve got someone.
Not a problem.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Meaning someone who can write English in American Litvishe chareidi dialect.”

Campaigner:
“You want the same text as the one from Israel, just rewritten in English? Or a brand new one, like I write it in Hebrew and someone translates it?”

Yizhar Hess:
“No, no. We need something completely different.
It has to speak their language. This isn’t just translation. It’s cultural adaptation.”

A few days later, they push forward with the U.S. campaign. The Conservative operatives are eager to launch, but adamant that their identity remains hidden.

Campaigner:
“Okay, I have an all-in-one price quote for the U.S.:
Ads in all the agreed neighborhoods.
Including an English-language copywriter familiar with the nuances.
Ad in Yated in English.
Ad in Mishpacha in English.
Ad in Ami Magazine (strongest reach there).
48,000 shekels.
Includes graphics, everything.
Assuming all three media outlets accept.
If one of them refuses, subtract $2,500.”

Yizhar Hess:
“[Name redacted.] The ad must be very simple, with Rav Landau’s letter front and center. In Hebrew and English. That’s it. No commentary.
Maybe just a headline: ‘It is forbidden to vote in the World Zionist Congress elections.’”

Yizhar Hess:
“Also, check what the legal situation is in the U.S.. Make sure that the agency you’re using won’t be forced to disclose your identity.”

Campaigner:
“It’s through the ad agency.
No one knows who’s behind it.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Which ad agency? The Israeli one?”

Campaigner:
“Yes.”

Yizhar Hess:
“I’m a little concerned. Double-check with them. What happens if they’re legally required to reveal the client’s identity?”

Campaigner:
“Checking.”

Yizhar Hess:
“There are some states where you can’t place ads without disclosing the sponsor.
Maybe it’s not like that there.”

Yizhar Hess:
“But we have to make sure.”

Campaigner:
“The ad agency is the one officially ordering it.”

In the continuation of the conversation, Hess gives specific guidance for the message to be included in the U.S. ads: a ban on participating in the Zionist elections. He insists the wording be clear and authentic.

Campaigner:
“What messages should go in the ad?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Just Rav Landau’s letter in Hebrew, and a simple title explaining the serious prohibition of participating in the Zionist elections.”

Campaigner:
“Okay, will take care of it.”

Yizhar Hess:
“But it needs to be written by a healthy, mainstream American chareidi. A typical Israeli ad agency will fail at making it sound authentic.”

Campaigner:
“They employ a professional English copywriter.”

Yizhar Hess:
“But that’s not enough. It’s not just English.
Even in England and Australia they speak English. It has to be someone who specializes in American chareidi language. Otherwise, we’ll fall flat.”

Throughout all the correspondence, it’s clear how obsessed the Conservative operatives are with not being exposed. They repeatedly emphasize that all publications must use chareidi-style language and design to avoid raising suspicion.

After the posters and related tweets featuring their photos appear in the streets of Yerushalayim and Bnei Brak, Hess himself retweets the photos, along with a message describing Eliyahu Gafni as “pleasant and kind.” This sparks a group debate about whether Hess’s tweet might reveal their involvement.

Campaigner:
“Yizhar, I don’t think this tweet is a good idea.
Not because of the content,
but because it might cause people to connect the dots between you and the posters.
It’ll raise suspicion, and people might stop tweeting in the future, etc.”

Yizhar Hess:
“If I don’t respond, it’ll look even weirder. That’ll raise suspicion.”

Campaigner:
“Don’t agree.
Pindrus’s people will jump on this.”

Eyal Ostrinsky:
“Yizhar, better listen to him.”

In another section of the chat, Hess reacts to a draft text:

Campaigner:
“Thoughts on the text?”

Yizhar Hess:
“Does it sound like something a ben Torah would write?”

Campaigner:
“I think so.
I’ll ask.”

Campaigner:
J “Love it.
Excellent. If it sounds like that, then it should reach the ears of the bnei Torah.”

Yizhar Hess:
“Now I know they say Tayreh, not Toyrah.”

{Matzav.com}

[COMMUNICATED]

Over the last 16 years, a new approach and method of limud Hashas has been nurtured and developed in Eretz Yisroel at Reshet Kollelei Shas Yiden. This phenomenon has captured the imagination and electrified lomdei Hatorah throughout the world, and has earned the avid support of Gedolim across the Torah spectrum. 

Shas Yiden in UK & USA

Shas Yiden not only grew from 6 avreichim metzuyonim to 126 avreichim geonim in five kollelim across Eretz Yisroel but, in response to repeated requests from abroad, a Shas Yiden kollel was first established in the UK, in Stamford Hill, London. The Shas Yiden reputation soared in this location and their first Annual Siyum Hashas with Gedolei Torah in attendance reflected the grandeur of those in Yerushalayim.

This foray into Chutz La’aretz has been followed by a long-awaited opening of a Shas Yiden kollel in Flatbush, NY. The Eretz Yisroeldike bren of learning the entire Shas has already had a significant local impact and is a source of inspiration to the local Flatbush kollelim. The incredible devotion to limud gantz Shas and its completion within a year by each avreich at Shas Yiden has encouraged many others to try and emulate this broader study of Shas.

This elevated level of Torah study at Shas Yiden and the ability of the avreichim geonim to face public oral farheren by world recognized Gedolei Torah, together with monthly tests on 225 blatt, is nothing short of remarkable. Shas Yiden has truly raised the bar in the study of Shas. Our unique system of learning, the tight demanding regimen and the motivation emanating from Eretz Yisroel has truly placed Shas Yiden in a Torah league of its own. 

In the Words of Maranan Hageonim

Sar Hatorah, רשכבה”ג Maran Hagadol Harav Chaim Kanievsky, זצ”ל – Nasi, Shas Yiden
I tested them, I know them throughout Shas – a Yissachar-Zevulun pact with Shas Yiden is the most mehudar partnership 

Rosh Hayeshiva, רשכבה”ג Maran Hagadol Harav Gershon Edelstein, זצ”ל
Shas Yiden has raised the bar of Torah learning in both depth and clarity, and its unique method of ameilus in Torah

The Sanzer Rebbe, שליט”א
A first in 2000 years of Jewish history – never before a Torah institution where ALL the avreichim know kol Hashas kulo, Rashi and Tosfos b’al peh

Over 1.6 Million Blatt at Shas Yiden
This Year Alone!

With each of the 122 avreichim geonim at Shas Yiden required to complete a minimum of 13,555 blatt per year, you are helping support some 1,654,000 blatt! 

At the most recent farheren, the reaction of the Gedolei Torah conducting the testing to the prowess of the Shas Yiden was simply one of amazement at the breadth and detailed knowledge and all-encompassing mastery of Shas – remarking: “They know it like others know Ashrei Yoshvei!” The joy of the avreichim geonim and their clear love of Torah electrifies each farher. (To see the different farheren in action, please click on our website: www.shasyiden.com.) It is no wonder that the overall reaction to the Shas Yiden Network is that in its 15 years it has certainly revolutionized and raised the bar in the learning and mastery of Shas. 

Caring for the Avreichim Families

Despite the difficulties of these last few years, Covid etc., Shas Yiden has made sure to keep our commitment to each of the Shas Yiden families to ensure their menuchas hanefesh to be free to focus on Shas.  Each month their salaries have been paid on time. Further, in Tishrei and, now again, for Nissan, they are all paid full extra salary checks to help them meet the extra Yom Tov expenses. 

That we are able to do so, a big ‘thank you‘ is due to you all. You have an eternal stake in the incredible learning of Shas Yiden. Your on-going interest and support in this unique ‘Entire-Shas’ Torah-learning venture is most sincerely appreciated. Collectively and individually, you are singular partners in changing the way the Torah world views the ability to both learn and master the entire Shas. Whatever you can do to help in defraying their extra Yom Tov expenses will be a great chesed to these Bnei Torah who are true bnei aliyah.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas appeared on Jimmy Kimmel Live! and didn’t hold back when asked whether she’d go head-to-head with President Donald Trump in an intelligence contest. When asked about the possibility of a public IQ face-off, she didn’t hesitate.

“He also called you low IQ, I’m sure you’re aware of that,” Kimmel said. “Would you be willing to take an IQ test, publicly, head-to-head against the President of the United States?”

“Absolutely,” Crockett interjected. “Absolutely. Absolutely.”

The back-and-forth stems from comments Trump made during a March radio interview with host Vince Coglianese. Responding to Crockett’s jab at Texas Governor Greg Abbott — in which she mocked him as “Governor Hot Wheels” — Trump had harsh words for the Congresswoman.

“It’s a lie, and she lies,” Trump said. “But, she’s a low life, and she’s a very low IQ person, and a low life. I don’t imagine the Democrats are going to have a person like that running their party. If they do they’ll never win an election again.”

Crockett later tried to clarify her statement, suggesting her nickname referred to the various forms of transportation Abbott has utilized in relocating illegal immigrants out of the state — including planes, buses, and trains — rather than his disability.

During her segment on the show, Kimmel also asked Crockett whether she’s ever met Trump in person. He joked about Trump’s likely awareness of her and implied that she might be on his mind more than she realizes.

“You’ve not met Donald Trump, right?” Kimmel questioned.

“No,” Crockett answered. “No.”

“I feel like he likes you,” Kimmel added.

“No,” Crockett added.

“I do. Because — I think, see, I don’t think he would ever admit it. But, I think when someone’s aggressive and funny, they hit his radar, and he did speak about you once,” Kimmel said.

To support his point, Kimmel played a clip from Trump’s remarks at a National Republican Congressional Committee dinner. In the video, Trump took a swipe at Crockett’s rising profile among Democrats.

“How about this new one they have? Their new star, Crockett?” Trump said in the video. “How about her? Are they serious about that? That’s their new star? If that’s their new star, they’re in serious trouble.”

{Matzav.com}

Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff issued a forceful rebuttal to a report by Politico, which claimed that the Trump administration is evaluating whether to remove sanctions on Russia. The pair blasted the article as completely fabricated.

“This is false,” Rubio and Witkoff said in a joint statement. “Neither of us have had any conversations about lifting sanctions on Russia as part of a peace deal with Ukraine. This is just totally fictitious and irresponsible reporting from Politico, a fifth-rate publication. If they have an ounce of journalistic integrity they will fully retract this piece of fiction.”

According to Politico, unnamed sources suggested that Witkoff had been the central figure advocating for the removal of sanctions, specifically regarding Russia’s Nord Stream 2 energy project and other sanctioned assets. The report attributed this claim to “five people familiar with the discussions.”

The article alleged that Witkoff instructed his staff to compile a comprehensive list of U.S. sanctions against Russian energy interests. The piece asserted:
“White House special envoy Steve Witkoff has been the main proponent of lifting sanctions, people familiar with the talks told POLITICO. Witkoff, who has said he has developed a friendship with Putin in his role as Trump’s envoy to Moscow, has directed his team to draw up a list of all of the energy sanctions that the United States has placed on Russia as part of the effort, two people familiar with the matter said.”

Nord Stream 2, the pipeline system built to transport natural gas beneath the Baltic Sea to Germany, partially survived a major explosion in 2022, which damaged one of its two lines and its companion Nord Stream 1. The cause of the blast, which stopped gas flows, is still being investigated, though some reports suggest involvement by Ukrainian individuals.

The Politico piece also asserted that Witkoff floated the concept of easing sanctions, though the idea has not gained significant support within the administration. Rubio was portrayed as a key figure resisting such a move:

“A second person said that while Witkoff has raised the idea of lifting energy-related sanctions, the idea so far has not found much traction in the White House and that Rubio has tried to derail it. ‘This is not a cake in the oven being baked, though the ingredients are being assembled,’ this person said.”

This article emerged amid reminders of the Trump administration’s earlier moves to counter Russia’s energy ambitions. In 2019, BBC News reported that Trump signed legislation penalizing any firm aiding the completion of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline.

By contrast, Breitbart News highlighted that in May 2021, Joe Biden defended a decision to lift sanctions, thereby permitting work on Nord Stream 2 to resume.

However, in February 2022, the Biden administration reversed course and reinstated sanctions targeting the project, coinciding with Germany’s suspension of the pipeline’s certification, as Axios reported.

{Matzav.com}

High-resolution satellite imagery of some of Israel’s most sensitive locations—including the Dimona Nuclear Research Center, military installations, and areas in Gaza showing IDF movements—is now widely accessible via Google Maps and Apple Maps. Posts circulating on X and other platforms reveal that these images have a resolution as sharp as 0.4 meters, far surpassing what was previously made available to the public.

This shift in image quality marks a significant development in the realm of open-source intelligence. With crystal-clear satellite views now readily available, actors ranging from adversarial governments to private analysts—and even casual users—can obtain detailed visuals of strategic Israeli sites. This change reflects both advancements in imaging technologies and evolving international regulations governing satellite data.

Back in 1997, the U.S. passed the Kyl-Bingaman Amendment, a law specifically designed to limit the commercial distribution of high-resolution satellite photos of Israel. The amendment, a product of Israel’s lobbying efforts in Washington, effectively curbed American companies from selling or publishing such images without federal approval, at a time when the U.S. dominated commercial satellite imaging.

That dynamic shifted significantly by 2017. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) concluded that satellite imagery produced outside the United States had surpassed what American companies were offering in terms of resolution. As a result, mapping platforms gained access to foreign-sourced images that weren’t bound by Kyl-Bingaman restrictions, allowing for sharper and more detailed depictions of Israeli territory.

Oxford researchers Andrea Zerbini and Michael Fradley highlighted in a 2018 study that images of Israel exceeding the 2-meter threshold had already been circulating for years. Firms like Airbus and South Korea’s Kompsat were offering images at 0.4-meter resolution. This led U.S. authorities in 2021 to formally approve the commercial sale and online publication of images with that same level of clarity.

Since then, it has become relatively easy to view detailed satellite photos of highly sensitive Israeli locations, including Dimona and other key military sites that aren’t shielded underground. Some of these images even show aircraft in mid-mission and ground units moving through Gaza and southern Lebanon.

There is little the Israeli government can do to control this growing exposure. American companies are free to publish these images as long as they adhere to the original parameters of the Kyl-Bingaman Amendment, and global access to high-resolution imagery is now a commercial standard across industries ranging from urban planning and agriculture to mining and academic research. The scale of exposure was illustrated dramatically in 2021 when international outlets published satellite evidence of new construction at Dimona—a revelation that would have been unimaginable under past restrictions.

As this trend continues, the key concern is how Israel plans to respond. So far, the silence from both the Defense Ministry and the IDF spokesperson suggests a policy of deliberate non-engagement. But with sensitive information already out in the open and no signs of the trend reversing, it’s becoming increasingly clear that ignoring the issue may no longer be a viable path forward.

{Matzav.com Israel}

President Trump issued a sharp rebuke to Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Thursday in response to Russia’s deadliest assault on Ukraine in nearly a year. In a post on Truth Social, Trump called on Putin to bring an end to the violence.

“I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV,” Trump wrote. “Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!”

This unusually pointed message from Trump followed an intense overnight bombardment by Russia targeting Kyiv, which left at least nine dead and over 70 others injured. The attack, involving a mix of missiles and drones, marked the most lethal strike on Ukraine’s capital since the previous July. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky described the assault as “one of the most outrageous.”

Alongside his comments about the Russian onslaught, Trump also appeared to criticize the Biden administration, suggesting that not enough is being done to finalize a peace settlement that could end the prolonged war. Trump reiterated concerns over Ukraine’s willingness to engage in a final agreement, despite Zelensky having already signed onto a Trump-backed cease-fire proposal weeks earlier. Trump also asserted—without presenting evidence—that Russia was prepared to negotiate peace.

Zelensky, however, contradicted Trump’s assessment. In a post on X, he emphasized that Ukraine had upheld its side of the ceasefire arrangement, while accusing Russia of ignoring the terms and continuing its aggression.
“It has been 44 days since Ukraine agreed to a full ceasefire and a halt to strikes. This was a proposal from the United States,” Zelensky stated. “And it has been 44 days of Russia continuing to kill our people and evading tough pressure and accountability for its actions.”

Details of the so-called “final offer” from Trump’s administration reveal significant concessions to both sides. Under the plan, Russia would receive several major diplomatic and economic benefits. Among them is official US recognition of Crimea as Russian territory, a stark reversal of long-standing American policy that refuses to validate territorial seizures. In addition, the US would offer “de facto” acknowledgment of Russia’s control over the eastern Ukrainian regions of Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia—while still technically maintaining they are Ukrainian land. The plan also includes a promise from the US not to support Ukraine’s bid to join NATO, the lifting of certain sanctions against Russia, and the prospect of increased US-Russia cooperation in energy and industrial sectors.

In exchange, Ukraine would receive guarantees of military protection from European forces following the cease-fire, although the US would not play a direct role in this defense pact. The deal also includes the return of a limited section of the Kharkiv region currently under Russian control. Ukraine would gain navigation rights along the Dnieper River, a key waterway near active conflict zones. The proposal also mentions help with reconstruction efforts after the war, though it remains unclear which parties would finance that rebuilding.

{Matzav.com}

Israel came to a standstill on Thursday morning as a two-minute siren sounded nationwide at 10 a.m., marking Holocaust Remembrance Day.

Pedestrians stood still, drivers exited vehicles and public transportation halted in a powerful display of collective memory for the six million Jews murdered in the Holocaust.

Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu attended a wreath-laying ceremony at Yad Vashem in Jerusalem as part of the official state commemoration. The event honored Holocaust martyrs and heroes, and was attended by top government officials, dignitaries, and Holocaust survivors.

Established in 1951, Yom Hashoah is observed annually on the 27th of Nissan. The siren tradition began in the 1960s and has become one of Israel’s most solemn national rituals, uniting the country in remembrance and reflection.

“We bow our heads in memory of the victims,” Netanyahu said during the ceremony. “Their legacy obligates us to defend our existence and ensure never again means never again.”

Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu lays a wreath at Yad Vashem. Photo by Amos Ben-Gershom (GPO).

Public ceremonies, educational programs, and survivor testimonies are taking place throughout the day across Israel and Jewish communities worldwide. JNS

{Matzav.com Israel}

[COMMUNICATED]

On May 7th, join a select group of passionate Jewish school leaders at an intimate high-impact workshop. 

What You’ll Leave with:
– A clear Mission Statement that drives purpose and goals.
– A powerful Vision that inspires growth and unity.
– Core Values that guide every decision, big and small.  

This is not a conference. It’s a working session.  Participants will leave the workshop with real, actionable frameworks to transform their leadership, and their school.  

Plus, personalized 30-minute follow-up call with Robert.  

Centrally located for New Jersey and New York Schools, this workshop will take place at Hilton Garden Inn, Staten Island,  May 7th, 2025, 9:30 – 3:30 pm.

Bring Your Key Team Members.  

Click Here to Reserve Your Spot Now! 

Eligible for professional development funding – ask us how!

Brought to you by Clear Square Group – driving change in education.

Rav Dov Landau, rosh yeshiva of Yeshivas Slabodka in Bnei Brak, was taken to Maayanei Hayeshua Medical Center early Thursday morning after suffering a fall at his home during the night.

The incident occurred at his residence on Rechov HaRav Sher in Bnei Brak. The rosh yeshiva experienced significant pain following the fall, raising concerns that he may have sustained a fracture.

Due to the incident, Rav Landau was unable to attend Shacharis at the yeshiva this morning.

Upon his arrival at the hospital, a series of tests and imaging were conducted, and the rosh yeshiva remains under observation for the time being.

All are asked to daven for a refuah sheleimah for Rav Ephraim Dov ben Devorah.

{Matzav.com Israel}

At a stirring asifa held at Binyanei HaUma in Yerushalayim, Slabodka Rosh Yeshiva Maran Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch delivered a heartfelt message of chizuk, warning against efforts in today’s society to dismantle the Torah world.

The annual gathering was organized by a leading kiruv organization and was attended by prominent roshei yeshiva, rabbanim, and mekarvim.

“We are living in a time when kofrim (heretics) — not Amaleik, chas v’shalom — but heretics nonetheless, are working to uproot Torah from Klal Yisroel entirely,” Rav Hirsch declared. “They want a reality in which Torah no longer exists within Klal Yisroel, in Eretz Yisroel, and in the world of Torah learning.”

He began his remarks by quoting the Malbim, who explained that Amaleik’s power emerged during a period of rifyon in Torah. That spiritual weakness in learning led to a broader weakening of emunah, creating the conditions that allowed Amaleik’s force of kefirah to strike.

“Amaleik,” Rav Hirsch explained, “represents the force of denial. Reishis goyim Amaleik—he is the beginning of rebellion. When faith within Klal Yisroel diminishes, that opens the door for Amaleik’s influence. Torah learning strengthens malchus Shamayim, it increases kavod Shamayim—and when Hashem’s presence is more felt in this world, emunah naturally increases.”

He elaborated that even when a person doesn’t see Hashem clearly, the inner hargashah created through Torah learning plants the seed of belief. “When there’s more kavod Shamayim, there’s more emunah in the world,” he said. “And that is the greatest thing, especially in our generation.”

Rav Hirsch emphasized to those involved in kiruv and strengthening Torah that their very efforts elevate kavod Shamayim, regardless of visible results. “Even if you think you didn’t succeed with someone, just the fact that you tried is already a success! That action itself brings kavod Shamayim, and that generates emunah.”

He returned to his central concern: “Today, there are heretics who are trying to destroy Torah! Not Amaleik, chas v’shalom, but deniers who want Torah to disappear entirely from Klal Yisroel, from Eretz Yisroel, and from the olam haTorah. But it is precisely through Torah learning and your efforts that this force will be weakened. It will diminish the strength of those who oppose us and empower us to continue learning with hasmadah, with depth, and to bring more and more kavod Shamayim.”

Rav Hirsch concluded with a hopeful message: “And through increasing kavod Shamayim, we will merit more emunah, and ultimately, this will lead to teshuvah sheleimah for all of Klal Yisroel. And through that, we will surely see the geulah sheleimah speedily in our days. Amein.”

{Matzav.com Israel}

In a ruling handed down by the Lod District Court, the Belzer chassidus has been ordered to pay NIS 24 million in damages to nine former students who were subjected to abuse at its Talmud Torah in Tel Aviv.

Judge Zvi Weitzman ruled that both the institution and its mechanchim must compensate the students, who suffered both physical and emotional mistreatment while enrolled at the school. At the time of the abuse, the boys were between the ages of three and ten.

According to the verdict, the leadership of the Talmud Torah disregarded multiple complaints raised by parents and even fellow staff members about mechanchim who engaged in abusive behavior. In some isolated instances, disciplinary action was taken, but in most cases, the complaints were ignored until the matter became the subject of a police investigation.

The court rejected Belz’s claim that the school was under the jurisdiction of the Chinuch Atzmai network and determined that the Belz community itself operated the institution. As such, it was found directly responsible for the abuse and is liable for compensating the victims.

“לעולם אין להרים יד על תלמיד,” the judge wrote. “One must never raise a hand against a student.”

Details of the case, which were first revealed by Ynet, describe horrific punishment methods allegedly used by certain educators. The children were reportedly subjected to public humiliation, beatings in front of their classmates, being force-fed hot pepper, restrained with zip ties, locked in rooms, kicked, struck with rulers, scissors, and knives, and endured extreme psychological torment.

{Matzav.com Israel}