Matzav

A provocative protest installation was discovered Friday morning near the private residences of former Supreme Court President Aharon Barak, retired Supreme Court Justice Uzi Fogelman, and Tel Aviv-Jaffa Mayor Ron Huldai, drawing immediate attention for its graphic and accusatory imagery.

At each location, protesters placed cloth dolls with severed heads laid on the ground in pools meant to resemble blood. Accompanying signs delivered personal messages aimed directly at the figures associated with the homes, linking them to past legal decisions and public statements.

The placards referenced rulings and positions connected to immigration policy and the treatment of migrant populations. Each sign carried a different message. The one near Barak’s home stated: “You prided yourself on canceling the infiltration laws – we got decapitated heads.” Outside Fogelman’s residence, the sign read: “You wanted hobbies – we got decapitated heads.” The sign placed near Huldai’s home said: “You said a person is a person is a person – we got decapitated heads.”

The display was described by organizers as a reaction to a recent and shocking killing in south Tel Aviv, where a migrant murdered another migrant by beheading him. The protest was framed as an expression of anger over what organizers view as the deteriorating security and social conditions in the city’s southern neighborhoods.

In a statement issued by the group “The Front for the Liberation of South Tel Aviv,” headed by Sheffi Paz, the organization said: “When a resident of Kiryat Shalom can’t take her dog for a walk in the park for fear that a migrant will jump on her with a machete; when a child in the Shapira neighborhood can’t play in the playground for fear that migrant children will lynch him; and when an elderly person in the Hatikva neighborhood can’t withdraw money from the ATM for fear of being attacked and robbed violently – we remember the arrogant Supreme Court justices, who cared about the matchmaking and hobbies of the infiltrators, and the cowardly mayor who fosters a slave ghetto in the southern neighborhoods.”

Paz continued with further criticism of Israel’s judicial and municipal leadership, saying: “Their compassion is our disaster. Their embrace of border thieves is a spit in our faces. Their fake liberalism is the knife in our back. We know that the display won’t move their closed minds, but we thought there was no reason why only we should enjoy the cultural wealth they forced on us.”

{Matzav.com}

Airport officials at Ben Gurion located a 13-year-old boy on Thursday night who had previously drawn national attention after secretly boarding an El Al flight to New York last October without a ticket or passport. This time, he was identified before reaching the security screening areas.

The boy was noticed inside the terminal but outside the standard passenger flow. A deputy shift commander on duty observed behavior that raised suspicion and stopped him for questioning.

During the encounter, airport personnel confirmed the boy’s identity and determined that he was the same minor who had managed months earlier to fly abroad without authorization or identification.

Following this and other recent incidents, the Israel Airports Authority announced changes to security procedures at Ben Gurion Airport. Under the updated protocol, boarding passes will now be inspected earlier in the screening process rather than only near the departure gate.

The decision comes after another serious breach earlier this week, when an 18-year-old Israeli boarded an Austrian Airlines flight from Israel to Vienna without holding a valid ticket. The oversight was discovered only after the plane landed in Austria, and the passenger was returned to Israel.

Addressing that case, the Israel Airports Authority said, “A preliminary investigation of the incident revealed that the passenger underwent security screening but did not complete the border control procedure.”

Airport officials said an immediate review was carried out in coordination with the Population and Immigration Authority and the airline involved, and that the circumstances surrounding the incident remain under investigation.

{Matzav.com}

Israel’s Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories accused the authors of a recent IPC food security analysis on Gaza of producing a report whose conclusions were decided in advance and detached from verified humanitarian data, arguing that its publication undermines genuine relief efforts.

In a statement responding to the report, COGAT said the way the assessment was compiled raises doubts about the organization’s professionalism. According to COGAT, the IPC team met with Israeli officials only after drafting the report and finalizing its conclusions, and even when presented with “complete, daily, and verified data,” the authors “chose to present a series of excuses regarding the use of the data and relied only partially on the information provided.” COGAT stated: “The manner in which the IPC conducted itself during the preparation of the report raises serious questions regarding its credibility and professional integrity.”

COGAT also pointed to what it described as internal contradictions in the report, saying its authors ultimately acknowledged there is no famine in Gaza, despite earlier claims to the contrary, while still maintaining assertions of severe food insecurity.

Detailing the scope of aid entering the territory, COGAT stressed that “between 600-800 aid trucks enter the Gaza Strip every day, approximately 70 percent of which carry food,” explaining that this is “in accordance with Israel’s commitment under the ceasefire agreement to allow and facilitate the entry of 4,200 aid trucks per week.” The statement further said: “Nearly 30,000 food trucks carrying more than 500,000 tons of food entered the Gaza Strip throughout the ceasefire period,” while adding that “approximately 100,000 food trucks entered the Gaza Strip until the start of the ceasefire.” According to COGAT, “these quantities significantly exceed the nutritional requirements of the population in the Gaza Strip according to accepted international methodologies, including those of the UN World Food Programme (WFP).”

COGAT emphasized that much of this assistance does not flow through UN channels, noting that “only about 20 percent of the humanitarian aid entering the Gaza Strip is delivered via the UN, while the remainder is delivered by countries, additional international organizations, and the private sector.” It said this fact “illustrates the severe gap between the actual volume of aid and the partial data on which, among other things, the IPC report relies.”

The Israeli agency added that all aid figures are shared transparently, stating the data are “presented daily as part of joint situational assessments to the mediators, the UN, and international organizations,” and warning that “any attempt to present the data otherwise or to claim a shortage of food constitutes a deliberate distortion of the facts.”

In its official rebuttal, COGAT said: “COGAT strongly rejects the claims and conclusions presented in the IPC report published today (Friday), which once again portrays a distorted, biased, and unfounded picture of the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip. The report relies on severe gaps in data collection and on sources that do not reflect the full scope of humanitarian assistance. As such, it misleads the international community, fuels disinformation, and presents a false depiction of the reality on the ground.”

Concluding its response, COGAT warned that flawed assessments harm, rather than help, civilians in Gaza. It stated: “The publication of statements and warnings that are not based on complete and verified data does not advance the humanitarian response. Instead, it harms it and diverts the discussion from the real challenge – improving collection and distribution mechanisms within the Gaza Strip and preventing Hamas from taking control of the aid.” The statement added that the international community must “avoid falling for false narratives and distorted information,” and that COGAT “will continue to act, together with international actors and regional partners, to ensure the entry of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip and its transfer to the civilian population, while preventing the exploitation of the aid by the terrorist organization Hamas.”

{Matzav.com}

Security camera recordings from Weizmann City Mall in Tel Aviv show a hijab-wearing woman approaching a menorah and extinguishing four Chanukah candles while a man believed to be with her claps in approval. After walking away, she returns moments later to put out the shamash that remained lit, and she appears to document the episode on her cellphone.

Israeli authorities are weighing whether the incident constitutes a criminal offense under Section 170 of the Penal Law, which bars “the destruction, damage, or desecration of a place of worship or any object held sacred by a group of people, with intent to insult their religion, or knowingly that they may regard the act as an insult to their religion.”

Police confirmed that an investigation has been launched into the actions of an Arab individual seen in the footage blowing out the Chanukah candles, with detectives reviewing the video and examining the circumstances surrounding the act.

ערבייה עוברת בחנוכיות מתעדת איך היא מכבה אותן, ומצלמת להנאתה: התיעוד מקניון וייצמן. גועל נפש! pic.twitter.com/7RJ3O20gtF

— Yossi Eli (@Yossi_eli) December 19, 2025

At a high-level gathering of Russia’s defense establishment, President Vladimir Putin lashed out at Western leaders, using crude language to ridicule UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and suggesting that Russian weaponry could soon be positioned close enough to threaten Britain.

Speaking during the annual defense ministry meeting, Putin accused former US President Joe Biden of deliberately provoking the war in Ukraine and claimed European governments rushed to align themselves with Washington. “Everyone assumed that they would destroy Russia in a short period of time, they would ruin it,” Putin said.

He continued with even sharper rhetoric aimed at Europe, adding: “And the European piglets immediately joined in to aid the former American administration in this task. They were hoping to profit from the collapse of our country. To get back something that was lost in previous historical periods and try to take revenge. As it has now become obvious to everyone. All these attempts and all these destructive plans towards Russia completely failed.”

The remarks were delivered as tensions spiked following reports of a World War III alert, after Russian border guards allegedly crossed into a NATO country without authorization.

Putin used the occasion to argue that Russia has weathered Western pressure, declaring that “Russia has demonstrated its steadiness in the economy, finance, in the internal political situation of the society […] and in the sphere of defence capacity,” while also saying Moscow remains open to talks with Europe — though not with current European leadership.

The comments came just ahead of a crucial summit of European Union leaders focused on reaching an agreement to continue financing Ukraine.

In the same appearance, Putin confirmed that Russia plans to deploy its Oreshnik missile system in Belarus in the near future, placing it within minutes of London. According to Ukrainian intelligence assessments cited by the Express, the move is not primarily aimed at Kyiv but is intended to pressure European capitals.

The planned deployment would position the system roughly 124 miles from Lithuania and the nearest NATO border, significantly shortening missile flight times across much of the European Union compared to launches from within Russia.

Oleh Ivashchenko, head of Ukraine’s Foreign Intelligence Service, warned that the move is designed to intimidate Europe, saying: “The deployment of Oreshnik on Belarusian territory is a means of pressure primarily on the EU and NATO, not on Ukraine.

“This move will allow Russia to expand its capabilities for striking the capital of any European country and significantly reduce missile flight time compared to launching from the Kapustin Yar test site.”

Ivashchenko added that Russia and Belarus are currently building the necessary military infrastructure for the system, including launch sites as well as tracking and communications facilities, though he noted that the work is not yet finished.

Belarusian leader Aliaksandr Lukashenka previously said on October 31 that the Oreshnik missile system is expected to become operational sometime this month.

The Pentagon says its expanding maritime campaign against drug smuggling has now resulted in more than 100 deaths, following a pair of U.S. strikes Thursday on boats traveling in the eastern Pacific.

According to the U.S. military, two separate vessels were targeted along routes long associated with drug trafficking. Three people were killed when the first boat was hit, while two others died in the strike on a second vessel, the military said in a post on social platform X that also included a 30-second video of the attacks.

U.S. Southern Command said the boats were moving through “known narco-trafficking routes” in the eastern Pacific Ocean and were “engaged in narco-trafficking operations.” The command added that the vessels were operated by members of designated terrorist organizations, though it did not identify which groups were involved.

The military emphasized that no U.S. service members were injured during the operations.

Since early September, when the campaign began, U.S. forces have carried out at least 26 strikes against suspected drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, killing a minimum of 104 people described by the Pentagon as narco-terrorists.

One of those earlier missions, conducted on Sept. 2, has drawn particular attention. During that operation, U.S. forces launched four strikes on a suspected drug-trafficking vessel in the Caribbean. The Washington Post later reported that a second attack during the same mission killed two individuals who had survived the initial strike and were clinging to the boat.

Amid the scrutiny, Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) said Thursday that he has seen “no evidence of war crimes” connected to the operation. Some Democrats and experts in the law of armed conflict have argued that the follow-up strike may have violated international law.

{Matzav.com}

WATCH:

Law enforcement officials announced Thursday evening that the man suspected in last weekend’s deadly shooting at Brown University was also believed to be responsible for the killing of a prominent Massachusetts Institute of Technology nuclear scientist days later. The suspect was identified as Claudio Manuel Neves-Valente, according to Providence police.

Federal and local officers located Neves-Valente dead Thursday night after spending hours outside a storage unit associated with him in Salem, New Hampshire. Authorities said tactical teams breached the unit at about 9 p.m. and made the discovery shortly thereafter.

“This evening at approximately 9 p.m., federal agents breached a storage locker in Salem, New Hampshire, in search of Claudio Neves-Valente, a Portuguese national we believed shot and killed two Brown University students and an MIT professor in Brookline, Massachusetts,” said Leah B. Foley, the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, during a separate briefing. “Federal agents found Neves-Valente dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound.”

The Brown University shooting occurred Saturday afternoon at approximately 4 p.m. during a finals week study session in the Barus and Holley Building on the eastern side of campus. Two students were killed and nine others were wounded. Investigators have not identified a motive, and the case remains under active investigation, Providence Mayor Brett Smiley told reporters.

University officials confirmed that Neves-Valente had previously been enrolled at Brown. Brown President Christina Paxson said he studied physics at the university from the fall of 2000 through the spring of 2001, later taking a leave of absence before formally withdrawing in 2003.

The Barus and Holley Building, where the shooting took place, has long been home to physics and engineering classes, Paxson said.

“I think it’s safe to assume that this man, when he was a student, spent a great deal of time in that building for classes and other activities as a Ph.D. student in physics,” Paxson said. “He has no current active affiliation with the university or campus presence.”

Records also show that a man with the same name was dismissed from a monitoring position at the Instituto Superior Tecnico in Portugal in 2000. Authorities believe that individual is the same person identified as the shooter.

That institution is also where MIT nuclear physics professor Nuno Loureiro studied. Loureiro was found fatally shot Monday at his home in Brookline, Massachusetts, roughly 50 miles from Brown’s campus. Rhode Island officials said the Loureiro investigation was being led by Massachusetts authorities, who later confirmed Neves-Valente was the prime suspect.

In the days following the Brown attack, police pursued several leads, including questioning a person of interest at a hotel outside the city, who was later ruled out. Investigators canvassed surrounding neighborhoods for surveillance footage, which produced images of a masked, stocky individual estimated to be about 5 feet 8 inches tall and walking with an unusual gait.

Susan Constantine, a body language expert, pointed to a distinctive movement pattern in the footage, noting that the person’s right leg appeared to bow inward with the toe angled outward while walking. Police later released images of a second individual believed to have information related to the case and asked the public to assist in identifying both people.

As of Thursday afternoon, six of the wounded victims remained hospitalized and were listed in stable condition. The two students who were killed were identified as Ella Cook of Alabama and Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov of Virginia.

{Matzav.com}

Federal prosecutors warned Thursday that an enormous share of the roughly $18 billion in federal funding directed to 14 Minnesota-administered programs since 2018 may have been siphoned off through fraud, calling the scope of the alleged theft unprecedented in size and complexity.

Speaking at a news conference in Minneapolis, First Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson said investigators are uncovering schemes that go far beyond routine billing abuses. Instead of inflated claims for real services, he said, some operators set up shell companies that provided nothing at all while billing Medicaid and spending the proceeds on international travel, luxury cars, and extravagant personal expenses.

“The magnitude cannot be overstated,” Thompson said. “What we see in Minnesota is not a handful of bad actors committing crimes. It’s staggering, industrial-scale fraud.”

According to Thompson, the losses are not abstract. He said the alleged fraud threatens critical services, including housing assistance for adults leaving addiction treatment programs and one-on-one therapy for children on the autism spectrum.

The latest disclosures come after years of federal investigations that began with the Feeding Our Future case, a $300 million scheme that prosecutors described as the largest COVID-era fraud involving child nutrition programs in the country. In that case, 57 defendants have already been convicted. Prosecutors say the nonprofit at the center of the operation exploited a state-run, federally funded program intended to provide meals to children.

From there, investigators began tracing money flows into other state programs. Thompson said the inquiry into Minnesota’s autism services grew directly out of the Feeding Our Future case.

“Roughly two dozen or so Feeding Our Future defendants were getting money from autism clinics,” Thompson said. “That’s how we learned about the autism fraud.”

On Thursday, prosecutors announced additional charges tied to the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention program, which is designed to support children with autism. Court filings allege that a newly charged defendant approached parents in the Somali community to “recruit their children” for a clinic and paid kickbacks to inflate enrollment. Prosecutors say the clinic later submitted $6 million in Medicaid claims. In a related case, a woman previously charged in the same scheme pleaded guilty Thursday morning after allegedly receiving $14 million in reimbursements.

Authorities also unveiled new charges in a separate housing services fraud. Five defendants were charged with stealing funds meant to help Medicaid recipients secure stable housing. Thompson said one of those defendants left the country after his company was served with a federal grand jury subpoena.

Two of the newly charged individuals are Philadelphia residents accused of what Thompson described as “fraud tourism,” saying they viewed Minnesota’s Housing Stability Services Program as a source of “easy money.” Prosecutors allege they submitted $3.5 million in fraudulent claims. Those defendants join eight others charged in September in connection with the same program, which has since been shut down entirely.

Investigators are now examining yet another state-run initiative, Integrated Community Supports, which is intended to help adults with disabilities live independently. Authorities served a search warrant Thursday as part of that probe. Prosecutors noted that payments to providers are projected to reach $180 million this year, a dramatic increase from the program’s early years, prompting concerns that it too has been exploited.

“Every day, we look under a rock and find a new $50 million fraud scheme,” Thompson said.

The findings have added fuel to President Donald Trump’s criticism of Minnesota’s leadership. He has repeatedly labeled the state a center of financial crime, pointing to the fraud cases under Gov. Tim Walz, who was the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee in last year’s election.

Trump has also focused his attacks on Minnesota’s Somali community, the largest Somali population in the United States. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Minnesota, 82 of the 92 defendants charged across the child nutrition, housing, and autism-related cases are Somali Americans.

Last month, the rhetoric escalated after City Journal reported that taxpayer dollars from defrauded programs may have ended up benefiting al-Shabab, an al-Qaida affiliate. Thompson said funds sent overseas could have indirectly reached the group but stressed that investigators have found no evidence that defendants intentionally supported terrorism.

“There’s no indication that the defendants that we’ve charged were radicalized or seeking to fund al-Shabab or other terrorist groups,” Thompson said.

He added that large sums of fraudulently obtained money were sent abroad and used primarily for personal enrichment. Prosecutors said some defendants purchased real estate in Nairobi, Kenya, which has a large Somali diaspora. In other cases, one Feeding Our Future defendant spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on an aircraft in Nairobi, another wired $1.5 million to China and Kenya while texting that he had invested $6 million in Kenya, and another bought coastal property in Alanya, Turkey.

Despite Thompson’s statements, Trump has continued to use inflammatory language, referring to the Somali community as “garbage” and saying he does not want immigrants from Somalia in the United States. Community leaders say the comments have intensified fear and anger.

At the state level, Walz has taken steps to respond. In October, he ordered a third-party audit and paused payments to the 14 high-risk Medicaid programs for 90 days.

“We will not tolerate fraud, and we will continue to work with federal partners to ensure fraud is stopped and fraudsters are caught,” Walz said in a statement Thursday.

Last week, Walz appointed a statewide director of program integrity tasked with identifying and preventing fraud. Still, Republican lawmakers have continued to fault his administration, arguing that the failures allowed billions of taxpayer dollars to be misused before authorities intervened.

{Matzav.com}

A court in Nanterre, outside Paris, handed down a two-and-a-half-year prison sentence on Thursday to a 42-year-old Algerian woman who worked as a nanny and was convicted of poisoning the parents of Jewish children in her care, according to AFP. Alongside the custodial sentence, judges ordered her barred from entering France for five years.

The panel also convicted the woman of possessing and using a forged Belgian identity card, a separate offense uncovered during the investigation.

Judges described the crimes as a grave violation of the family’s confidence, with the presiding judge calling the conduct a “major betrayal of trust” against the parents of children who were then aged 2, 5, and 7.

Despite disturbing elements raised during the probe, the court declined to classify the case as aggravated by antisemitism. The judges said that statements attributed to the defendant emerged later in the investigation and were not made in the presence of her lawyer, preventing them from being used to support that charge.

The case stemmed from events in 2024, when the parents began noticing unusual and alarming signs inside their home. In January, they contacted authorities after discovering that a bottle of grape juice reeked of bleach and that the mother experienced severe eye pain after using her makeup remover.

Investigators determined that several household items had been deliberately tainted. During questioning, the nanny acknowledged that she had poured cleaning substances into bottles of alcohol owned by her employers. At that time, she told police she “never should have worked for a Jewish woman.”

At trial, however, the defendant reversed course. She told the court that the incriminating statement was fabricated under pressure during interrogation and insisted that her actions were not motivated by antisemitism.

{Matzav.com}

TikTok has finalized an agreement to separate its US business into a newly formed company controlled by American investors, according to an internal company memo first reported Thursday by Axios.

The arrangement is expected to bring to a close a protracted battle between TikTok and Washington that has unfolded over several years, driven by US government demands that ByteDance, the app’s China-based parent company, relinquish control of its American operations due to national security concerns.

In a message to employees, TikTok CEO Shou Chew said the transaction is scheduled to be completed on January 22. The new company will operate under the name TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. Under the ownership structure outlined in the memo, Oracle, Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi-based MGX will together control 45 percent of the venture. Affiliates of existing ByteDance investors will retain close to one-third of the company, while ByteDance itself will hold just under a 20 percent stake.

According to Axios, the US-based entity will assume full authority over sensitive areas including data security, protection of the algorithm, content moderation, and software integrity. The memo states that the company will place special emphasis on “retraining the content recommendation algorithm on U.S. user data to ensure the content feed is free from outside manipulation.”

The document also notes that a “trusted security partner” will be tasked with auditing and verifying compliance with US national security requirements. Oracle is set to take on that role once the divestment is finalized.

The agreement follows legislative action taken shortly before Joe Biden left office, when he signed a law mandating a ban on TikTok if ByteDance failed to divest its US assets. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has issued multiple executive orders aimed at keeping the platform operating while negotiations moved forward.

Trump had previously backed a TikTok ban during his first term but later reversed course, promising to “save TikTok” during his campaign. He has credited the platform with helping him connect with younger voters and boost support in his victory over Democrat Kamala Harris in the November 2024 presidential election.

{Matzav.com}

Authorities say the man suspected of carrying out the deadly shooting at Brown University was discovered dead Wednesday night inside a storage unit in Salem, New Hampshire.

According to multiple law enforcement sources cited by Boston25 News, the gunman is “no longer with us.” Officials have not yet released details about how he died, and the circumstances surrounding his death remain under investigation.

Earlier in the evening, police converged on an Extra Storage facility in Salem after locating a vehicle they believed was connected to the suspect. The car reportedly matched the make and model of one seen near the Brown University campus at the time of the shooting, as well as near the Brookline location where MIT professor Nuno Loureiro was murdered.

The suspect is believed to have entered Brown’s Barus & Holley building on Saturday and opened fire inside a lecture hall. Two students were killed in the attack: Ella Cook, 19, a sophomore from Alabama, and Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov, 18, a freshman described as an Uzbek American.

In addition to the two fatalities, nine other people were struck by gunfire during the attack. As of Wednesday, six of the wounded victims remained hospitalized, according to reports.

Investigators have not yet said whether the suspect’s death is being treated as a suicide or whether other factors may have been involved.

The Knesset moved forward with a disputed piece of legislation dealing with Jewish religious expression in public life, approving it in a 49–35 vote and sending it onward in the legislative process.

Opponents quickly charged that the proposal crosses into religious coercion, while its backers said it is meant to safeguard Jewish identity in the public sphere.

The bill, titled “Realization of Jewish Identity in the Public Sphere,” was introduced by Likud MK Galit Distel Atbaryan together with Otzma Yehudit MK Yitzchak Kroizer. Its stated aim is to guarantee that Jewish citizens can openly express their national and religious character without obstruction. Supporters argue that it formalizes protections for traditional Jewish observance in public settings.

Among its provisions are requirements that mezuzahs be affixed in public institutions and that public observance of Orthodox Jewish practices be shielded from interference. Actions that hinder such practices — including administrative or bureaucratic obstacles — could be treated as criminal offenses under the proposal. Public acts such as prayer and the donning of tefillin would receive explicit legal protection.

The bill also includes a highly contentious section that would require judges serving in civil courts to demonstrate proficiency in halacha as a condition for appointment. In addition, it assigns exclusive authority over disputes arising from the legislation to the Grand Rabbinical Court. If implemented, this clause would effectively block the appointment of any judge who failed to pass such an exam.

That aspect of the bill has drawn particularly sharp opposition. The Ministerial Committee for Legislation objected to the judicial provisions, and Distel Atbaryan indicated during a stormy Knesset debate that these elements are likely to be revised or removed during committee discussions.

Following its approval in a preliminary reading, the legislation is now slated to move to committee, where it will be prepared for the first of three required votes before it can become law.

The proposal has reignited long-standing tensions over religion and state in Israel. Similar disputes surfaced in September 2023, when mechitzos were erected during large Yom Kippur tefillah gatherings in Tel Aviv’s Dizengoff Square, defying a municipal ruling and triggering confrontations with secular activists.

Criticism of the bill has come from opposition lawmakers, civil rights and religious freedom groups, and, according to Hebrew media reports, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara. While rabbinical courts already function within Israel’s judicial system — handling matters such as marriage, divorce, conversion, and inheritance — they do not currently hold authority over the secular court system.

{Matzav.com}

As the nation looks ahead to marking America’s 250th anniversary in 2026, a renewed debate is surfacing on Staten Island over whether the borough should once again pursue breaking away from New York City.

The discussion has gained momentum following the recent election of Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. Although Mamdani secured more than half of the vote across the city, his support on Staten Island was far more limited, drawing just 23% there, while former Gov. Andrew Cuomo won 55% of the borough’s vote, underscoring the political divide.

Borough President Vito Fossella said the election results have prompted some residents to push for revisiting the idea of secession. “This is a number of people on Staten Island who want to pursue the secession question and determine the future of Staten Island in very short order,” Fossella said in an interview with 1010 WINS on Thursday.

The idea is hardly new. Staten Islanders previously voted on the issue in a 1993 referendum, when 65% supported seceding from New York City. Despite that result, the proposal stalled and was never advanced by lawmakers in Albany.

According to Fossella, dissatisfaction with citywide policies continues to drive interest in separation. “We talk about different things that happen across New York City. We don’t want them,” he said. “We get things we don’t want, and we don’t get things that we do want.”

He added that longstanding worries remain central to the debate. “There are concerns about public safety and what will happen,” Fossella said. “There’s always a concern about taxes and the services we get in return. So there’s a real palpable sense that secession might be the long-term solution for the people of Staten Island, and I think they deserve to have that conversation.”

Fossella also said he expects the incoming mayor to ensure that Staten Island receives equal treatment. “I’m a big believer that actions speak louder than words and the choices that are made really are more important than the rhetoric that’s on the table,” he said. “I will take the incoming mayor on his word that he wants to help. I hope he does.”

At the same time, Fossella acknowledged that any move toward secession would face significant hurdles. “I put more faith in the people of Staten Island than I do in leaders of other parts of the city to determine Staten Island’s fate,” he said. “But it’s not as easy as that. You can’t just wave a wand. There’s a legislative political process that needs to be addressed and followed, and I hope it doesn’t take years. We hope to get to it sooner rather than later.”

{Matzav.com}

Discussion on ABC’s “The View” on Thursday centered on President Donald Trump’s proposal to issue bonus payments to active-duty military personnel, with co-hosts offering sharply different reactions to the plan.

During the broadcast, Whoopi Goldberg voiced skepticism about the intent behind the proposal, suggesting it was designed to secure loyalty. She later said, “And what he’s doing now is he’s thinking, if I make sure the soldiers have what they need they’ll back me and what I want.”

The comments followed remarks Trump made Wednesday night announcing the initiative. He said, “Tonight, I am also proud to announce that more than 1,450,000 — think of this —1,450,000 military service members will receive a special, we call ‘warrior dividend,’ before Christmas, a warrior dividend in honor of our nation’s founding in 1776. We are sending every soldier $1,776. Think of that, and the checks are already on the way. Nobody understood that one until about 30 minutes ago.”

Goldberg questioned whether the payments would actually materialize, telling viewers, “Let’s see if they get the check. I want to see if they get it first.”

Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin acknowledged the benefit to service members, saying, “The one thing I’ll give him credit is bonus to troops and giving them $1700.”

Griffin went on to argue that while the money could provide short-term relief, it did not address broader economic concerns. “Listen, coming off the government shutdown and the delay that they all had — they got back pay — but people need help. But all Americans need help right now and just a handout isn’t the answer. Smart policies are the answer,” she said.

{Matzav.com}

The Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok chassidus has launched a fundraising effort to support its yeshiva ketanah, announcing a rare raffle centered on a silver yarmulka worn by the Rebbe last Shabbos Chanukah.

Leaders of the chassidus say the initiative is aimed at strengthening the yeshiva for younger bochurim, which serves the entire kehilla. In recent weeks, significant efforts have been underway to stabilize and expand the institution so it can continue providing a strong Torah framework for the chassidus’ youth.

The institutions of Toldeos Aharon Yitzchok are overseen by R’ Mordechai Webberman and R’ Binyamin Monderer, who manage the talmud Torah, the yeshiva gedolah, and the girls’ educational framework. They have now also assumed responsibility for sustaining the yeshiva ketanah. According to an announcement made to the public, the administration committed to covering half of the yeshiva’s expenses, while the parents’ committee undertook responsibility for the remaining half.

As part of the fundraising campaign accompanying the establishment of the yeshiva ketanah, the chassidus will conduct a special raffle featuring a yarmulka made of pure silver that was worn by the Rebbe on Shabbos Chanukah.

Donors who contribute at least 200 shekels per month for 24 months will be entered into the raffle once, while those who pledge 500 shekels per month for the same period will receive five entries.

{Matzav.com}

A familiar sight from decades past — friends and family walking travelers all the way to the gate — is beginning to reappear at a handful of U.S. airports, as select facilities introduce programs allowing limited post-security access for non-travelers.

Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport in California announced this week that it is launching a guest pass initiative that permits “non-passengers” to enter secured areas of the terminal. The move marks a notable shift from strict post-9/11 security norms that have long restricted gate access to ticketed travelers only.

According to the airport, visitors who want to accompany departing passengers must apply online for security approval, which can be submitted up to seven days before the intended visit. Once the application is reviewed, the Transportation Security Administration will issue an OAK guest pass to approved applicants.

Those granted access will be required to present the guest pass along with a TSA-approved photo ID, such as a passport or Real ID, before proceeding through security. The airport notes on its website that approved guests may enter the post-security side of the terminal to spend time with loved ones prior to departure.

For many travelers, the change revives memories of a very different airport experience. Before 2001, airports across the United States generally allowed anyone — even without a boarding pass — to pass through security checkpoints and wait at the gate. That changed after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, which led to the creation of the TSA and the introduction of federal regulations limiting access to secured areas exclusively to ticketed passengers.

Oakland is not alone in revisiting that earlier model. Several other airports have already implemented similar programs, while additional facilities are considering doing so. Cleveland Hopkins International Airport offers a “hangout pass,” San Antonio International Airport operates a “SAT Pass,” and Kansas City International Airport provides its own “guest pass.” Philadelphia International Airport has introduced a “wingmate pass,” while Detroit Metropolitan Airport issues a “destination pass.”

The return of limited gate access has stirred nostalgia among travelers online. In the “r/travel” forum on Reddit, one user asked, “How was airport security before 2001?” The question prompted a flood of recollections from users who remembered a more communal airport atmosphere.

“One of the biggest differences is that unticketed people could come with you, so family could accompany you to the gate,” wrote one commenter. Another responded, “One of my fondest memories is seeing my grandma as I exited the plane with my brother when my parents sent me out to see her.”

Others recalled airports as social spaces in their own right. “Going to the airport to watch planes was a big deal. Anytime one had to fly, or a friend or family member [was flying off], a whole group would accompany the traveler/s just to get there early and watch planes take off and land,” one user wrote. Another added, “You could go to the airport just to hang out, even if you had no travel plans.”

Some commenters contrasted those memories with the modern experience. One person reminisced about “being able to see people off at the gate (or vice versa). Now you have to say your goodbyes, then walk half a mile to your gate alone.” The same user noted that “being able to greet someone at the gate was nice.”

Oakland officials emphasized that the new access policy is not guaranteed to remain in place permanently. The airport stated on its website, “The OAK Guest Pass is not a permanent program.” The notice adds that, “In response to exigent circumstances or operational needs, the Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to cancel the program, cancel approved OAK Guest Passes or modify program rules at any time without prior notice.”

Attorneys for former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett have filed a police complaint against political social media activists, accusing them of spreading content taken from Bennett’s Telegram account that allegedly leaked following an illegal hacking incident.

According to the complaint, the materials were knowingly distributed after being obtained through criminal means, in violation of the law. Bennett’s lawyers argue that the dissemination of the messages is especially serious given the sensitivity of an election year and its potential impact on public opinion.

The complaint states that distributing materials obtained through unlawful wiretapping constitutes a serious criminal offense, punishable by up to five years in prison. Among those named are social media activist Ido Gavoni and an individual identified as Gor Ben Ze’ev, who allegedly shared screenshots of purported correspondence between Bennett and his former adviser, Shimrit Meir.

Investigative sources said the matter is being handled by the Shin Bet. Authorities believe the breach was limited to Bennett’s Telegram account and did not involve access to his personal phone. The complaint was also forwarded to the State Attorney and to the head of the police investigations and intelligence division, with Bennett’s legal team stressing that the incident represents an improper attempt to use a criminal hack to influence the democratic process.

{Matzav.com}

The Anti-Defamation League said that a senior hire announced by New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani had published antisemitic remarks on social media more than ten years ago.

On Tuesday, Mamdani selected Catherine Almonte Da Costa to serve as director of appointments in his incoming administration. Da Costa previously held a similar role during Mayor Bill de Blasio’s tenure.

According to the ADL, it uncovered posts from Da Costa’s X account written in 2011 and 2012 that contained antisemitic language.

Among the posts cited by the organization was the statement, “Money hungry Jews smh.” The abbreviation “smh” refers to “shaking my head.”

The ADL said Da Costa also wrote, “Promoted to upstairs office today! Working alongside these rich Jewish peeps,” as well as, “Far Rockaway train is the Jew train.”

Shortly after the ADL made the posts public, the X account was removed.

In response, the ADL said, “We appreciate Da Costa has relationships with members of the Jewish community, but her posts require immediate explanation — not just from Ms. Da Costa, but also from the Mayor-Elect.”

The controversy followed another incident involving Mamdani’s team, after a separate staff member issued an apology last month for past social media posts that portrayed Israel in a demonizing manner.

Mamdani’s transition operation has also drawn scrutiny for including Women’s March leader Tamika Mallory, who has been accused of engaging in antisemitic conduct.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump said the White House had not officially arranged a meeting with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, even as he indicated that the Israeli leader was eager to meet and that a visit was likely to take place in Florida.

Asked in the Oval Office whether Netanyahu would be coming to Mar-a-Lago later in the month, Trump replied, “We haven’t set it up formally, but he would like to see me,” adding, “He’ll probably come to see me in Florida.”

Despite repeated briefings from Netanyahu’s office over more than a week asserting that a meeting was scheduled for December 29, the White House had not issued any formal confirmation.

During the same exchange with reporters, Trump was also questioned about the possibility of Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi joining the gathering in Florida. Trump responded warmly, saying, “I’d love to have him. El-Sissi is a friend of mine.”

According to a US official quoted by The Times of Israel, Washington had been exploring the idea of hosting a three-way meeting involving Trump, Sissi, and Netanyahu. The official said US officials believed progress toward that goal was made after American mediation helped persuade Israel to move forward with a major gas agreement with Egypt, following months of hesitation by Netanyahu.

However, the same official said Egypt showed significantly less interest in such a summit, citing ongoing objections to Israel’s actions in Gaza and reluctance to offer Netanyahu a political advantage during an election year.

{Matzav.com}