Matzav

New Study: A Third of Americans Still Mistrust COVID Vaccines

A new study reveals that over one-third of Americans still harbor doubts about the scientific basis of COVID vaccines. This skepticism has remained relatively unchanged, with 36% of respondents expressing mistrust in 2021, 33% in 2022, and 36% in 2023.

Individuals who lost a family member or close friend to COVID-19 were notably more inclined to trust the science behind the vaccine and to accept vaccination, according to the study’s findings. For instance, those who had experienced a loss in the past year were nearly four times more likely to trust vaccine experts than those who had not lost someone close to them, researchers reported.

“Our findings underscore the critical role of trust in science during public health crises,” stated lead researcher Trenton White, a postdoctoral fellow at the Barcelona Institute for Global Health. “The fact that personal experiences of loss due to COVID-19 were associated with trust levels highlights the need for public health communications to be sensitive to the emotional impact of the pandemic.”

The study also found that vaccine acceptance was generally higher among men, individuals with college degrees, and those from higher-income households.

Looking ahead, the researchers suggested that public health officials should tailor their messaging to reflect the diverse demographics of the U.S. population in order to foster and maintain trust in science.

“This research provides valuable insights for policymakers and health communicators as they continue to navigate the ongoing challenge of global vaccine hesitancy,” said senior researcher Ayman El-Mohandes, dean of the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, in a CUNY news release.

The findings of this study were published on November 2 in the journal Vaccine: X.

{Matzav.com}

Military Judge Reinstates Plea Deals For 9/11 Mastermind KSM, Two Other Terrorists In Shock Ruling

A military judge made a ruling on Wednesday, stating that the plea agreements which spared Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, and two other terrorists from facing the death penalty must remain in place.

This unexpected decision follows a move three months ago when Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin annulled the controversial plea deals previously arranged by the Office of Military Commissions in July, which had been granted to Mohammed and his alleged accomplices.

The ruling, delivered by Air Force Col. and Judge Matthew McCall at the Guantanamo Bay facility in Cuba, was first reported by the Associated Press and has yet to be made available to the public.

The families of those killed in the devastating 9/11 attacks, which claimed nearly 3,000 lives, reacted with fury to the judge’s decision.

Retired police officer Jimmy Smith, whose wife Moira perished in the attack, expressed his anger to The Post, saying, “I am livid that this judge overturned the decision and is allowing these defendants to take a plea deal.”

Smith continued, “They committed the highest crime in this country and they should receive the worst punishment which in this case is the death penalty,” adding, “Also I don’t believe in coincidences, they waited to release this decision until after the election. They overturned it before to help the Democrats in the election.”

Dan D’Allara, whose twin brother, NYPD officer John D’Allara, was killed on 9/11, spoke with The Post and urged President-elect Donald Trump to exercise his executive powers to ensure that Mohammed and his co-conspirators are executed.

“The first Executive Order President Trump should sign is an Executive Order of Execution for the 5 admitted 9/11 plotters,” D’Allara said. “They are cowards and they killed a lot of innocent people that day and are continuing to kill people going forward.”

Patrick Hendry, President of the New York City Police Benevolent Association, called Wednesday’s ruling “shameful” and demanded that the situation be corrected immediately.

“This is yet another shameful twist in a case that has seen far too many,” Hendry said. “The cycle of revictimizing our hero 9/11 families needs to end. Our government needs to find a way to fix this immediately.”

“Justice cannot wait any longer,” he added.

The pre-trial agreements involving Mohammed, the alleged mastermind behind the al-Qaeda attacks, and two other accused conspirators—Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin Attash and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi—had originally offered the men immunity from the death penalty in exchange for guilty pleas, as part of the government’s lengthy process to prosecute the alleged terrorists.

These three individuals have been incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay since 2003.

The plea agreements, proposed by the Office of Military Commissions in July, sparked significant backlash from the families of the 9/11 victims and survivors, many of whom condemned the arrangements as a grave injustice and expressed a preference for a full trial for the accused men.

Following this, Austin, 70, made the decision to relieve the official who had approved the plea deals of his duties, choosing to intervene personally in the case.

“There’s not a day that goes by when I don’t think of 9/11 and the Americans that were murdered that day; also those who died trying to save lives and the troops and their families who gave so much for this country in the years following that,” Austin said, explaining his decision. “I’m deeply mindful of my duty to all those whose lives were lost or changed forever on 9/11, and I fully understand that no measure of justice can ever make up for their loss.”

Austin added, “So this wasn’t a decision that I took lightly, but I have long believed that the families of the victims, our servicemembers, and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commissions — commission trials carried out in this case.”

The lawyers representing the accused terrorists criticized the Secretary of Defense’s actions, describing them as “corrupt” and insisting that the plea deals had been negotiated in “good faith” over several years.

“We have had an unprecedented act by a government official to pull back what was a valid agreement,” Walter Ruiz, the attorney for al Hawsawi, said during a hearing at Guantanamo Bay, as reported by CNN.

“For us, it raises very serious questions about continuing to engage in a system that seems so obviously corrupt and rigged,” he added.

Kathy Vigiano, a retired police officer and widow of Detective Joseph Vigiano, who was also killed on 9/11, expressed her disbelief to The Post, saying that while she cannot accept that the accused terrorists will not be executed, she now hopes they will receive life sentences without parole.

“It’s unbelievable to me that these terrorists won’t get death,” Vigiano said. “I can only hope that they get life without the possibility of parole.”

{Matzav.com}

IT’S WAR: Trump-Hating NY Attorney General Letitia James Vows War With President-Elect In Divisive News Conference

NY Governor Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James, both of whom have long been vocal critics and adversaries of Donald Trump, expressed their commitment to defending New York against any potential “revenge or retribution” following the anticipated return of President-elect Trump to the White House.

During a press briefing on Wednesday, Hochul extended congratulations to Trump while also praising his rival, Vice President Kamala Harris, and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz for running a campaign that highlighted important issues affecting the nation.

She recognized that the election results may not align with the hopes of many, but reassured New Yorkers that the state has faced challenges before and emerged stronger.

“That’s why I have the confidence in my team and all those we work closely with that we will get through the uncertainty of a new administration in Washington because, as I said, we’ve done this before,” Hochul remarked. “I want to be very clear that while we honor the results of this election and will work with anyone who wants to be a partner in achieving the goals of our administration in our state, that does not mean we’ll accept an agenda from Washington that strips away the rights that New Yorkers have long enjoyed.”

The governor reminded citizens that New York is the cradle of several critical movements, including those for women’s rights, environmental justice, LGBTQ rights, and labor rights. She pledged that the state would continue to serve as a “bastion” of liberty and uphold the rule of law.

Additionally, Hochul unveiled the Empire State Freedom Initiative, a new program aimed at protecting areas she and other state officials believe could be threatened by the Trump administration. The initiative will focus on safeguarding reproductive rights, civil rights, immigration, gun safety, labor rights, and environmental justice.

“Our team will do whatever we have to do to identify any possible threats to these rights that we hold dear in the state of New York and protect New Yorkers,” Hochul stated. “This will include legislation, rulemaking, appropriations and partnerships with our congressional delegation and including the Biden administration at this time.”

The governor called on Trump to support New York’s efforts to secure funding for critical infrastructure, particularly for the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and to back economic development initiatives, such as those supported by the Chips and Science Act.

“I will work with him or anybody, regardless of party, on these kinds of efforts that I know will benefit the state of New York,” Hochul affirmed. “However, if you try to harm New Yorkers or rollback their rights, I will fight you every step of the way. New Yorkers are resilient. We fought the first time around, and we’ll fight again.”

James also offered her congratulations to Trump but with a clear sense of resistance. She assured the people of New York that state officials, including her office, would collaborate with the Trump administration “if possible,” but would not compromise the state’s values or principles in the process.

“We did not expect this result, but we are prepared to respond to this result. And my office has been preparing for several months because we’ve been here before,” James remarked. “We faced this challenge before, and we used the rule of law to fight back. And we are prepared to fight back once again because, as the attorney general of this great state, it is my job to protect and defend the rights of New Yorkers and the rule of law. And I will not shrink from that responsibility.”

Between 2019 and 2021, James pointed out that her office had taken nearly 100 legal actions against Trump’s prior administration, including challenging attempts to cap state and local taxes, eliminate funding for law enforcement, and attack other key policies.

James also highlighted her office’s efforts to protect the Affordable Care Act, block the inclusion of a citizenship question on the census, and halt the dismantling of the U.S. Postal Service.

She expressed confidence in her understanding of the Trump administration’s tactics, noting that her team is prepared with a contingency plan to counter any actions that could harm the state.

“We’re ready to respond to any attempts to cut or eliminate any funding to the great state of New York, as the governor outlined,” James stated. “So, despite what has happened on the national stage, we will continue to stand tall in the face of injustice, revenge or retribution.”

“This is not the time to be fearful, New York, but faithful and steadfast, knowing that I, as the attorney general, along with my entire team, we are guardians of the law, and we are prepared, my friends, to fight back,” she concluded.

{Matzav.com}

Special Counsel Jack Smith Taking Steps To Wind Down Federal Cases Against Trump

Donald Trump began this year fighting two federal prosecutions that threatened to send him to prison, but he will end it free and clear of his most significant criminal legal problems.

With his resounding victory at the polls and a longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president, the key question is not if, but when, prosecutors will move to dismiss or delay his federal election interference case in Washington, D.C.

Trump recently said he would fire special counsel Jack Smith “within two seconds” upon returning to the White House. Now, that won’t be necessary to bring his federal criminal troubles to an end. According to a source familiar with Justice Department deliberations, Smith is taking steps to end both federal cases against Trump before the president-elect takes office.

1. What are the outstanding cases the federal government has lodged against Trump?

A grand jury in Washington indicted Trump this year on four felony charges related to his efforts to retain power in 2020, culminating in the violent siege on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Judge Tanya Chutkan had set a trial date for March 2024, but that date came and went after the Supreme Court accepted the case and ultimately granted Trump significant immunity from prosecution for official actions he took while in the White House. The judge is now beginning to assess which parts of the prosecution’s case involve official acts and which pertain to private conduct by someone seeking office rather than holding it.

In a separate criminal case, the Justice Department has appealed Trump’s alleged hoarding of classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago resort and his refusal to return them to the FBI. Judge Aileen Cannon, whom Trump appointed to the bench, dismissed the documents case on July 15, the first day of this year’s Republican National Convention, reasoning that the way the special counsel was appointed violates the Constitution. The Justice Department is seeking review by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

2. What does Trump’s election victory mean for these cases?

They are on life support and likely to conclude even before the January inauguration. On the campaign trail, now President-elect Trump vowed to fire special counsel Jack Smith on his first day in office. However, Trump would not need to dismiss Smith or instruct DOJ officials to terminate Smith in order to end the criminal prosecutions.

In 2000, a lawyer in the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, which advises the federal government on its powers and limits, concluded that a sitting president cannot be indicted or prosecuted because doing so “would unconstitutionally undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions.” This policy against prosecuting presidents has been upheld by both Republican and Democratic administrations.

The Florida case involving classified documents is somewhat more complicated. The DOJ could file notice with the appeals court that it is abandoning the appeal. However, this case involves two other defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos de Oliveira. Dismissing the appeal outright would also mean abandoning the cases prosecutors have built against these two defendants—Trump’s personal aide and the Mar-a-Lago property manager.

Moreover, the federal government may have a broader interest, as Cannon’s reasoning could disrupt the way special prosecutors have been appointed for decades. However, a DOJ veteran not authorized to speak publicly told NPR that Cannon’s ruling would not be considered binding precedent, so the stakes may be lower.

Former Attorney General William Barr remarked that voters have evaluated the allegations against Trump and have delivered a decisive verdict of their own. “Further maneuvering on these cases in the weeks ahead would serve no legitimate purpose and only distract the country and the incoming administration from the task at hand,” Barr said in a written statement first reported by the Guardian.

3. What happens to the special counsel, Jack Smith?

Special counsels must submit a report on their actions to the Attorney General when their work concludes. The current attorney general, Merrick Garland, has pledged to make most of these reports public. If Smith’s report is not complete by Inauguration Day, it will fall to the new DOJ leadership to decide its outcome.

Mike Davis, an ally of Trump, told a conservative interviewer this week that the attorney general “is probably President Trump’s most important appointment.” Davis added that Smith’s entire office should be dismissed, stating, “After today, Jack Smith, you’re going to be the hunted: legally, politically, and financially. So lawyer up, buddy.”

4. Trump also faced criminal charges in two states, New York and Georgia. How will the election reshape those cases?

In New York, a jury this year convicted Trump on 34 criminal charges related to bookkeeping for an alleged hush money payment shortly before the 2016 election. Justice Juan Merchan has scheduled a hearing for Nov. 12 to determine how the Supreme Court’s immunity decision might impact this case. It’s unclear if the criminal sentencing for Trump, set for Thanksgiving week, will occur, as his lawyers may seek to halt it in light of the election results.

The case against Trump in Fulton County, Georgia, over alleged election interference has been paused for months while a higher court reviews possible conflicts of interest involving District Attorney Fani Willis. A hearing in that appeal is scheduled for Dec. 5.

This case, too, could be overtaken by events, as a strategy of delay and deflection by Trump’s lawyers appears to have succeeded beyond expectations.

{Matzav.com}

Law Allowing Deportations of Families of Terrorists Approved in Second and Third Readings

The Knesset plenum approved, in the early hours of Thursday morning, the second and third readings of a law allowing the deportation of families of terrorists. The legislation was proposed by MKs Hanoch Milwidsky (Likud), Eliyahu Revivo (Likud), and Almog Cohen (Otzma Yehudit).

A total of 61 MKs voted in favor of the legislation, while 41 voted against it.

The law stipulates that the Minister of the Interior may order the deportation of a family member of a terrorist, following a hearing, if it is proven that the family member knew in advance of their relative’s intention to commit an act of terrorism and made no efforts to prevent it.

Additionally, a family member may be deported if they expressed support for or identified with the act, or if they published words of praise or encouragement for a terrorist act or a terrorist organization.

The validity of the deportation order for an Israeli citizen shall be no less than seven years and no more than 15 years. For a permanent or temporary resident, the validity shall be no less than 10 years and no more than 20 years.

The explanatory notes to the bill state: “In recent years, and particularly since the beginning of the Swords of Iron war, which erupted following the terrorist attack on October 7, 2023, there has been an increase in cases where citizens and permanent residents in Israel incite terrorism. This includes publishing direct calls to commit terrorist acts or words of praise, sympathy, or encouragement for such acts, supporting them, or identifying with them.”

The notes further explain that “studies conducted over the years, both by the National Security Council and the IDF, related to dozens of terrorists with Israeli citizenship, reveal that the terrorists’ primary concern was the potential repercussions for their families after an attack. There is no doubt that many terrorists will refrain from carrying out an attack if they know that their families will face consequences as a result.”

{Matzav.com}

Iran Sentences 4 People to Death for Spying for Israel

A revolutionary court in northwestern Iran has handed down death sentences to four individuals charged with espionage on behalf of Israel, according to a report by the semi-official Fars news agency on Wednesday.

Fars stated that three of the defendants, whose nationalities were not disclosed, were accused of aiding Israel’s intelligence agency, Mossad, in transporting equipment involved in the 2020 assassination of Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh.

Fakhrizadeh was regarded by Western intelligence agencies as the key figure behind a secret Iranian program aimed at developing nuclear weapons. However, the Iranian government has consistently denied such allegations.

In February 2021, The Jewish Chronicle reported, based on intelligence sources, that Fakhrizadeh was killed using a one-ton gun that was smuggled into Iran in pieces by Mossad agents, who included both Israeli and Iranian nationals.

Israel did not comment at the time of Fakhrizadeh’s death, and on Wednesday, an Israeli government spokesperson reiterated the country’s position in response to the Fars report, stating, “We never comment on such matters. There has been no change in our position.”

Fars also noted that the fourth individual sentenced to death was involved in a separate, undisclosed espionage case.

{Matzav.com}

Twists, Turns, and Trust

By Rabbi Pinchos Lipschutz

Life is full of twists and turns. We think everything is set and that our lives will proceed according to one plan, and then things switch. We lose our job, the kollel is no longer satisfying, we receive an offer from an out-of-town community, someone gets sick r”l, and so on.

There are so many variables in life for which we cannot plan. How we deal with them determines whether we will succeed. We can either throw up our hands in desperation, filled with misery and gloom, or we can accept that everything that happens to us is from Hashem and realize that it is up to us to accept the change and make the best of it.

Those who have emunah and bitachon are able to remain optimistic in times of challenge and change, for they know that Hashem is looking out for them and that nothing happens by chance.

This week’s parsha, Lech Lecha, provides chizuk and direction for everyone. The posuk states that Hashem spoke to Avrohom Avinu and told him to leave his ancestral home and head to the land He would show him. The Sefas Emes (632) cites the Zohar that Hashem’s directive of Lech Lecha is directed toward everyone, but Avrohom was the only one who heard the call and followed it.

There is a bas kol that says to go out and proclaims to every Yid not to limit themselves to the familiar and comfortable. Hashem placed every person in this world for a purpose. Everyone has a task that they can perform and a mission that they can complete. Often, that requires for a person to leave their comfort zone and the place where they were born, grew up, and set up house.

We are all here to accomplish things with our lives. Sometimes, doing that requires stepping into the strange and foreboding. The urge to stay home and enjoy a simple, comfortable life is always there, not far from the surface, but our charge as children of Avrohom, Yitzchok, and Yaakov is to brave the challenges and effect change as we work to make the world a better place. Often, doing so involves grief, aggravation, rough days, lonely nights, and lots of hard work. Those who hear the bas kol are able to persevere and go on to accomplish, while those who don’t proceed with emunah and bitachon get deterred and dejected.

Avrohom Avinu hewed the path for us. When he heard the bas kol that nobody else heard or paid attention to, he made it easier for us to hear and follow it. Ever since his time, throughout our history, those who made a mark and difference followed Avrohom’s example, often leaving behind creature comforts, friends, and family to venture forth, knowing that if they worked lesheim Shomayim, Hashem would be there with them.

Avrohom left his home behind and followed Hashem’s voice to the Promised Land. His son, Yitzchok, also left his home and followed the voice into a strange land where the locals were not friendly to him. His son, Yaakov, left his parents’ home and went to live with his uncle Lovon, suffering much degradation and privation, but emerging married with children and many possessions. His son, Yosef, was sent by Hashgocha to a foreign land, followed there by Yaakov, the shevotim, and their families.

Moshe Rabbeinu grew up in royal splendor and left it all behind, only to be forced to flee to a foreign land. He returned to his people and became their savior. And so it has been throughout the ages up until our day.

World War I was a turning point for our people. Many were driven from their homes into exile, where they had little food and no heat. They suffered from disease, pestilence, starvation, and worse. They had no money and no income. When the war ended, those who didn’t hear the bas kol did not return to their shtetlach. They went to the big cities and severed their connections to Yiddishkeit. They no longer had any frum social ties. They sent their children to secular tarbut schools and became lost to our people. Others fled to America, where they were promptly swallowed up by waves of assimilation. Millions were lost forever.

They had left their homes, but they weren’t following Hashem and the direction to which He had directed them. They became overwhelmed by the situation they found themselves in and lacked the spiritual strength necessary to persevere.

The people who remained loyal to the bas kol followed it back to where they belonged, to places where there were shuls and botei medroshim for them and schools for their children. They struggled but survived as faithful Yidden.

Following the Holocaust, survivors faced awful choices. They had lost everything and were barely alive. Which way should they go? Should they give up on life? On humanity? On hope for a future? Should they wallow in self-pity and lose themselves to depression and despair?

Or should they follow the bas kol, which called on them not to lose faith in Hashem, but to follow Him to fresh terrain and rebuild their lives and communities?

Those who followed the bas kol went on to get married, have families, establish shuls, yeshivos, and communities, and help recreate that which was lost. It is thanks to those courageous souls that most of us are here today and that Torah communities and mosdos are flourishing here and around the world.

People in our day are faced with the dilemma of whether to stay where they are and lead nice, comfortable lives or to move to a place where people like them are needed to provide leadership. Some remain where they are and are productive in their comfort zones, but others break out of their boxes and spread their wings to bring and support Yiddishkeit in places as far from their homes as Choron was from Be’er Sheva.

Sometimes the challenge is whether to secure a good job or to go into chinuch, where the pay is not as good, but where the opportunity to make an impact on future generations makes up in spiritual reward and satisfaction for what may be lacking in financial compensation. Sometimes the challenge is whether to get involved in communal needs and assist organizations that work for the public benefit, such as bikur cholim and the like. It is never easy, and it takes commitment and dedication.

Others leave major kehillos and follow the bas kol to kollelim across the country that provide oxygen and life to communities of fine people committed to Torah lives. Others seek out rabbinic positions in shuls struggling to hold out against the Open Orthodox onslaught. By doing so, they keep good people good and rooted in the wellspring of Torah. They keep the community alive and provide guidance and direction for young and old.

They follow the bas kol that Avrohom followed, choosing the more difficult path, following Hashem’s direction to seize a mission and then looking forward to a sense of accomplishment, armed with the promise of earning blessings and greatness.

Nobody said it would be easy, but blessed are those who hear the bas kol in every generation, dedicating their lives to following it and where it leads them.

Rav Yeshayah Cheshin descended from talmidim of the Vilna Gaon who followed his directive almost 300 years ago to leave Lita and move to Eretz Yisroel. The journey from Vilna to Yerushalayim was arduous, and when they arrived in the barren, forsaken land, deprivation of all types greeted them. Life was very tough.

Rav Yeshayah lived during the time when Rav Yehoshua Leib Diskin was rov in Yerushalayim and Rav Yeshayah served as a rebbi in the famed Yeshiva Eitz Chaim. In his sefer Divrei Yeshayah, he wrote of the difficult trip and transition his ancestors endured as they left Lita and went to Eretz Yisroel.

“In order to know and understand the enthusiasm and mesirus nefesh of the Talmidei HaGra and how they placed themselves in danger for a year to travel in small boats on treacherous waters, and what they endured in their initial settlement at a time of plagues and diseases, as well as pogroms, it is first necessary to study their spiritual foundation.

“It was a product of the storm that their rebbi, the Gra, created to gather in the exiles and to settle Eretz Yisroel, to which they were moser nefesh. They went through fire and water to hasten the redemption in this way, as our rebbi, the Gra, discusses in his seforim.

“Who is there who can tell the sad tales of what the early settlers endured? Plagues and pogroms, lack of water, poverty, and myriad diseases. Who is there who can tell of their bravery and obstinacy to maintain the settlement that teetered daily and threatened to fall apart due to the many tragedies and hardships? It is only because of the strength of their emunah to follow their rebbi, the Gra, and his blessings to them that they were able to remain there with an unshakable tenacity that no person can describe.”

And then he writes something quite fascinating, which I had never heard of, and I wonder if you did. Listen to this: “In the earlier period following the initial settlement, when there was a time of communal need, the residents of Yerushalayim would daven and say, ‘Help us in the merit of the Talmidei HaGra who came to settle in the Holy Land.’

“On Mondays and Thursdays, they would add to Tachanun the following phrase: ‘With Your goodness, please remove Your anger from Your people, from Your city, and from Your land, in the merit of the Torah, in the merit of acts of chesed, and in the merit of the students of the Gra who initiated the first [Jewish] settlement in the Holy Land.’

“They would then go to the kevorim of the leading students of the Gra, Rav Hillel and Rav Mendel of Shklov, as well as Rav Saadia of Mohilov, and daven for salvation.”

The Vilna Gaon heard the bas kol of Lech Lecha and taught his students to hear it and follow it. Thanks to them, Eretz Yisroel is now settled from north to south and east to west with Jews, and although there are still many problems and difficulties, we can hear the footsteps of Moshiach approaching.

The greatness and zechus of people who follow the bas kol is so significant that in times of greater difficulty, people would daven to be saved in the merit of those intrepid baalei emunah and bitachon who gave up all to follow the call.

In our day and in our lives, when we face ups and downs, when things are tough and not going the way we want, we should think of those heroes who went before us, who gave up everything to answer Hashem’s steady call, which promises blessings to those who maintain their faith in Him and dedicate their lives to improving and bettering the world.

Whatever befalls us, whatever betrayals we face, and when we are forced to change our course of action and look at the world and our existence differently, we should never despair. We should know that what happens is from Hashem, Who is guiding us to a better situation, a place from where we can experience brocha and hatzlocha and help prepare the world for Moshiach, just like those courageous souls throughout the ages, from Avrohom Avinu until today.

Lech lecha el ha’aretz asher areka. Follow Me to where I will send you,” says Hashem, “and there you will find blessing.”

We don’t merit for Hashem to speak to us verbally, but He does so through various occurrences that happen to us in life, which we must view through the lens of Torah. If we know that we are here for a purpose and that everything that happens to us is from Hashem, and if we dedicate our lives to Torah, avodah, mitzvos, and maasim tovim, then we will be able to pick up the signals and follow them to where they are leading us.

Our zaides and bubbes always had Hashem in their lives and never lost sight of their obligations in this world. There is no reason we should not be the same. Let us follow their example, handed down to them and us from Avrohom Avinu, and earn for ourselves a world of opportunity and brocha, which will lead us all to the geulah sheleimah bekarov.

Moment ‘Polling Nostradamus’ Who Predicted Kamala Harris Would Win Election Realizes He Was Wrong

Early Wednesday morning, Allen Lichtman, a political historian renowned for his accurate election predictions, appeared to be at a loss for words as he came to terms with the fact that his forecast—of a Kamala Harris win in the presidential race—was wrong. Lichtman, who has correctly predicted the results of nine out of the last ten elections since 1984, could be heard on a livestream exclaiming “I don’t get it” as Donald Trump’s overwhelming victory became clear.

The 77-year-old scholar and his son, Sam, reacted with surprise as the election results unfolded, streaming their reactions live for nearly six hours into the night. As the tide turned in Trump’s favor, the two were visibly stunned by the shifting numbers.

“This is the first moment of the night where I’ve lost hope a little bit,” Sam Lichtman remarked as it became clear that Pennsylvania had been called for Trump.

Meanwhile, his father, the elder Lichtman, rubbed his eyes in visible frustration at the unfolding results, remarking, “Good thing I have nothing to do tomorrow. And I’m not doing any interviews.”

Lichtman, who is an American University professor and often referred to as the “Nostradamus” of U.S. elections, had confidently predicted a victory for Harris, despite polling suggesting that another Trump term was more likely.

Lichtman, co-creator of the “Keys to the White House” forecasting model, which assesses 13 different factors to predict the outcome of elections, had found Harris leading in eight of those categories, compared to Trump’s three.

But as the livestream continued, both Lichtmans became increasingly frustrated by the results, with Trump leading in all seven key swing states. At that point, Allen Lichtman declared, “There’s nothing positive” for Harris in the data.

“Oh, the democracy’s gone,” a dejected Lichtman said. “Once democracy’s gone, it’s almost impossible to recover. The way to recover is by the dictators losing wars.”

Sam Lichtman, however, was less pessimistic, stating that he hoped Trump would serve his term and that “we never have to deal with him again.”

“I’ve said it a hundred times,” his father responded. “Democracy is precious, but like all precious things, it can be destroyed. And typically destroyed from within. And throughout the 21st century, democracy has been in decline everywhere around the world, and America has now fallen in step. But never give up hope.”

The elder Lichtman ended the broadcast with a final, somber reflection, saying, “It’s unfathomable.”

{Matzav.com}

Join Agudath Israel’s Post-Election Webinar – What the Results Mean for You

You have seen the results and heard the pundits, but what does the election mean for you, your school, and your community?

We invite you to join Agudath Israel’s post-election webinar, on Thursday, November 7, at 1:00 PM. This webinar will feature discussions about the key outcomes of this election and what they mean for the issues that matter most to our community.

From religious freedom and education policy to combating antisemitism and support for Israel, this year’s election results will shape policies that impact our lives. Agudath Israel’s team will break down the most important takeaways, provide analysis on what to expect in the months ahead, and answer questions from the community.

This is a valuable opportunity to gain insight into how the newly elected officials may address key issues and to learn about Agudath Israel’s ongoing advocacy on behalf of our community.

Click here to register.

{Matzav.com}

How Donald Trump’s Deportation Plan Would Work

Donald Trump’s proposed large-scale deportation plan, titled “Operation Aurora,” is moving closer to becoming a reality, raising concerns among immigrant advocacy organizations that millions of families could face forced removal from the U.S.

This mass deportation initiative, affecting those without legal status, was a cornerstone of the president-elect’s campaign, which touted November 5 as “liberation day” from previous immigration policies.

Pre-election polls indicated general support for deportation policies among some voters.

The American Immigration Council has projected that implementing Trump’s plan, potentially affecting 11-14 million individuals, would come with an estimated cost of over $315 billion.

Although Trump can’t initiate these actions until he takes office on January 20, 2025, immigrant rights groups, including the ACLU, have been strategizing for months in anticipation and are committed to challenging this policy in court. “That could take the form of an executive order,” noted Noreen Shah, the ACLU’s director of government affairs. “I think that he would quickly try to sow fear and a sense of impending chaos in the American public.”

During his previous term, Trump faced several lawsuits, including those led by the ACLU, targeting his policies on family separations and the “Remain in Mexico” initiative. Many of these cases resulted in halted programs, and Shah stated that similar legal actions are already in preparation.

An imminent escalation

Trump’s large-scale deportation policy has been a defining feature of the Republican platform this election, though it has also attracted notable opposition.

Latino leaders have voiced concerns that Trump’s plan could trigger renewed family separations, with estimates suggesting that one in three Latino families could be affected by this policy.

Advocacy group FWD.us expressed worries about the human and social toll of the crackdown, warning that many families would be “ripped apart.” Karoline Leavitt, a Trump campaign spokesperson, responded to concerns by stating that Trump would “make provisions for mixed status families.” She elaborated, “He will restore his effective immigration policies, implement brand new crackdowns that will send shockwaves to all the world’s criminal smugglers, and marshal every federal and state power necessary to institute the largest deportation operation of illegal criminals, drug dealers, and human traffickers in American history.”

Who faces deportation?

The American Immigration Council’s data shows that Mexican nationals are the largest group of undocumented immigrants in the U.S., numbering over 4.7 million. Deporting this group alone is estimated to cost $7.3 billion.

Yet Mexicans aren’t the only potential targets. Migrants from Central and South America, as well as Canada, Nigeria, and more than 75 other countries, could also face deportation under Trump’s plan.

The states expected to be most affected are California, home to around 2.1 million undocumented migrants, Texas with 1.8 million, and Florida with just over 1 million. Many other states have tens of thousands of undocumented residents as well.

Newsweek previously highlighted that various industries could be hit hard by the deportations, as many rely heavily on migrant workers. Farmers, in particular, are concerned about losing a workforce essential to their businesses, while the National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) warns of potential economic impacts, with fewer U.S.-born workers entering the labor market.

“If you look over the past five years, without immigrants and their children, there would have been no labor force growth in the United States,” said Stuart Anderson, NFAP’s executive director. “And that means that without labor force growth, it’s very difficult for a country to have economic growth, and without economic growth, living standards in a country stagnate and potentially even decline.”

The “Alien Enemies Act” as a tool

The ACLU argues that Trump may employ the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to push forward his deportation plans.

Originally enacted when the U.S. anticipated conflict with France, the Alien Enemies Act grants authority to deport noncitizens during wartime or an invasion. The law has been historically applied, including during the War of 1812 and World Wars I and II.

Trump and his allies have framed the influx of illegal immigrants as an “invasion,” potentially leveraging this law. “The Trump campaign, Trump surrogates, have talked about wanting to go after people based on their nationality,” said Shah. “That’s what the Alien Enemies Act sets up.” Shah added that even legally present individuals who lack full citizenship might be at risk, calling this approach “potentially unprecedented and potentially really far-reaching.”

Eric Ruark of NumbersUSA, an immigration reform advocacy group, stated that this approach reflects public demand. “Trump promised to reestablish the rule of law, both at the border and in the interior of the country,” Ruark said. He added that this resonated with voters “appalled by the Biden-Harris administration’s open border policies.”

Looking ahead to January

Advocacy groups are poised to counter Trump’s deportation plans in court. “I’ve sued every president since George W. Bush, including Presidents Obama and Biden. We have won cases before judges of all stripes, including those appointed by President-elect Trump,” said Karen Tumlin, founder of the Justice Action Center. She issued a statement directed at the incoming administration: “We will see you in court.”

Some groups fear that the anti-immigrant rhetoric could embolden individuals to take matters into their own hands, potentially before Trump assumes office. Certain communities have already reported a rise in harassment and intimidation, said Shah.

The ACLU is urging state and local governments to take proactive measures before the inauguration, emphasizing they have the power to protect residents. Shah explained that jurisdictions could implement policies similar to those used in emergencies to protect individuals with established lives in the U.S.

“They should prepare for mass deportations because those will wreak havoc on the communities,” Shah stated. “It will mean kids who go to school and their parents are gone and not there to pick them up at the end of the day. It could mean that hospitals become places that people are worried about accessing care, and when they go to access care, they have to worry about ICE agents or Border Patrol agents waiting outside their door.”

{Matzav.com}

Trump’s Return to White House Brings Prosecutions to Halt

Donald Trump’s claimed victory in the presidential election on Wednesday is set to halt the criminal cases against him, at least for the duration of his four-year term in the White House.

As the first former U.S. president to be charged with criminal offenses, Trump has faced four separate prosecutions this year. These cases range from allegations of a hush money cover-up involving adult film star Stormy Daniels during his 2016 campaign to his efforts to reverse the 2020 election outcome. In May, a New York jury found him guilty of falsifying business records in connection with the Daniels case, making him the first former president convicted of a felony.

In an interview on Oct. 24, Trump, a Republican, stated he would promptly dismiss U.S. special counsel Jack Smith—who handled the federal cases involving Trump’s election-related actions and retention of classified documents—saying he’d do so “within two seconds” of taking office.

Trump has denied all charges, describing the prosecutions as politically motivated.

“The American people have heard these Democrat prosecutors’ cases against President Trump and they’re still going to elect him anyway,” said Mike Davis, founder of the Article III Project, a conservative legal group.

While Trump would have the authority as president to dismiss Smith and close the federal cases, he would lack similar power over the New York hush money case and the Georgia prosecution regarding his 2020 election actions in that state. However, the unique legal immunity of the presidency makes it improbable he will face consequences in either case during his term.

“He was properly charged with crimes within the system we have,” commented Kristy Parker, special counsel at Protect Democracy, an advocacy group focused on countering authoritarianism. Parker added that halting the cases “won’t mean it was the right thing.”

One court date remains scheduled before Trump’s swearing-in on Jan. 20, although experts believe it is unlikely to proceed.

New York Case

In New York, Trump’s legal team plans to ask Justice Juan Merchan to postpone his sentencing, currently slated for Nov. 26. Trump could face a sentence of up to four years. Sentencing a president-elect prior to Inauguration Day would be a historic first, and experts anticipate the hearing will be delayed.

Merchan has already twice postponed Trump’s sentencing, initially scheduled for July 11, partly due to a July Supreme Court ruling that grants presidents broad immunity from prosecution for official acts. Trump argues the case should be dismissed based on this ruling, a position contested by prosecutors.

Trump intends to appeal his conviction after sentencing. His legal team has also appealed to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to shift the case to federal court, which could introduce further legal hurdles.

Federal Cases

Trump is also facing four charges in federal court in Washington related to alleged attempts to hinder the certification of votes after the 2020 election, which he lost to Democrat Joe Biden, by spreading false claims of election fraud.

Smith additionally charged Trump with unlawfully retaining classified documents after leaving office in 2021 and obstructing government efforts to retrieve them.

In July, Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, dismissed all charges after ruling that Smith’s appointment to the case was improper and lacked legal authority.

Smith’s team is appealing this decision, though Trump’s stated plan to fire Smith upon taking office likely signals the end of this case.

Georgia Case

Prosecutors in Fulton County, Georgia, charged Trump last year under state racketeering laws, accusing him of conspiring to overturn his 2020 election loss in the battleground state.

While Trump cannot directly halt the Georgia prosecution, his legal team has indicated they will argue that a sitting president should not be subject to criminal prosecution during their term.

Trump and eight of his 14 co-defendants in the Georgia case are asking a state appeals court to remove Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis from the case, citing alleged misconduct due to a romantic relationship she had with a former deputy. Oral arguments for this motion are set for Dec. 5.

If this disqualification effort fails, the case will proceed against other co-defendants, including Trump’s former attorney Rudy Giuliani and former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. However, legal experts believe the case against Trump himself will be stalled as long as he holds the presidency.

{Matzav.com}

In New Coalition Deal With Likud, Sa’ar Relinquishes Right To Oppose Chareidi Draft Bills

On Wednesday, Gideon Sa’ar reached an agreement with Likud to form a coalition, a move that effectively ends his opposition to the government’s proposal to exempt chareidi Jews from mandatory military service, despite his previous promises to fight against such efforts.

As part of the deal, Sa’ar will assume the role of Israel’s foreign minister, replacing Israel Katz, who will take over as defense minister after the ouster of Yoav Gallant. New Hope MK Sharren Haskel is set to become deputy foreign minister, focusing on public diplomacy, while Ze’ev Elkin will be appointed a minister in the Finance Ministry. Sa’ar’s foreign minister appointment follows Gallant’s dismissal, which occurred after Gallant opposed the government’s attempts to grant military exemptions to chareidi individuals.

Gallant’s removal followed an announcement by the IDF that it would issue an additional 7,000 draft orders for chareidi men, as well as a decision by the coalition to cancel a vote on a contentious bill regarding state-funded daycare subsidies for children of chareidi men who had not served in the army.

Despite Sa’ar’s repeated claims that his party would resist any legislation allowing draft evasion or that didn’t meet military needs, his new coalition arrangement with Likud gives him little leeway on these issues, except for bills related to the judicial system and medical cannabis.

An anonymous source familiar with the situation told The Times of Israel that although New Hope still officially opposes such legislation, voting against it could be problematic due to the coalition agreement with Likud.

The source added that while the party might abstain from votes, “right now it’s not coming to a vote.” The coalition is considering two key pieces of legislation: one major bill aimed at regulating chareidi conscription, which critics argue is essentially a way to grant broad exemptions; and another temporary measure, known as the Daycare Bill, which would allow chareidi men who have not served in the military to continue receiving daycare subsidies despite a High Court ruling blocking such benefits.

Sa’ar has previously voiced skepticism about the coalition’s attempts to legislate a solution to the chareidi draft issue. In June, he told The Times of Israel, “if we cannot legislate a good law, it’s better not to legislate a law at all.”

In an effort to address opposition within the coalition regarding the chareidi-related bills, Coalition chairman Ofir Katz informed Likud MK Dan Illouz on Wednesday that he would be removed from the Knesset’s Economic Affairs, Foreign Affairs, and Defense Committees and would be prohibited from submitting private bills for the next six weeks. Illouz had publicly opposed the Daycare Bill, a stance also shared by another Likud lawmaker, Yuli Edelstein, who stated this week that he would not back “any law that attempts to circumvent our ceaseless efforts to expand the conscription base in the State of Israel.”

Kan public broadcaster reported that Katz also informed Edelstein that he would be barred from submitting bills for a month and prohibited from representing the faction in Knesset.

Rumors about Netanyahu replacing Gallant with Sa’ar had been circulating for months before Gallant’s dismissal, with Sa’ar initially denying in July that he had been offered a role in the coalition. Sa’ar, a former prominent member of Likud, had a falling out with Netanyahu that led him to leave politics in 2014, only to return later with a commitment not to work with Netanyahu again.

However, after the October 7 Hamas invasion and massacre in southern Israel, Sa’ar joined the National Unity coalition with Benny Gantz. His party, New Hope, later withdrew from the alliance in March and left the government after his request for a position in the high-level war cabinet was denied.

In opposition, Sa’ar was a vocal critic of the government’s handling of the Gaza war, even suggesting he would make “concessions” to other opposition parties to form a right-wing bloc against Netanyahu. Despite speculations about Netanyahu firing Gallant and replacing him with Sa’ar, Sa’ar initially declined the role of defense minister in September due to the escalating conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Just over a week later, however, Sa’ar rejoined the government as a minister without portfolio and became a member of the security cabinet, a smaller group responsible for key wartime decisions. His return to the coalition bolstered the government’s majority in the Knesset to 68 seats, providing Netanyahu with greater political flexibility.

At the time, Sa’ar defended his decision to return to the government, stating, “There’s no point continuing to sit in the opposition, where most members’ positions on the war issue are different, even far from my own. Right now, it is my duty to try to contribute at the table where decisions are made,” while praising Israel’s recent strikes against Hezbollah.

Alongside the new cabinet positions, Sa’ar was promised to lead a new ministerial committee aimed at strengthening communities in the Golan Heights, as well as renewed efforts to promote Ariel University in the West Bank.

As part of his new role, Sa’ar’s Foreign Ministry will receive an additional NIS 545 million ($146 million) to boost Israel’s public diplomacy abroad. Sa’ar and New Hope’s Ze’ev Elkin will also participate in security consultations, including those focused on Iran’s nuclear program. Elkin will oversee the Tekuma Directorate, which is tasked with rebuilding the Gaza border communities attacked by Hamas on October 7, as well as the Northern Rehabilitation Directorate. He will also be involved in formulating the government’s postwar Gaza strategy.

{Matzav.com Israel}

TOTALLY INSANE: Whoopi Goldberg: I ‘Still’ Won’t Say Trump’s Name After Election Victory

On Wednesday’s episode of The View, Whoopi Goldberg reiterated her stance on not mentioning Donald Trump’s name, even in light of his recent election win. She first praised Kamala Harris for her relentless campaign efforts, stating, “People didn‘t come out, I don‘t know why, and it doesn‘t even matter. He’s now the president.” She then confirmed, “I’m still not going to say his name. That’s not going to change.”

Goldberg’s refusal to speak Trump’s name on The View began when he initially took office in 2016, with Goldberg stating she simply “can’t” say the words “President Trump.” In 2018, she addressed criticism of her decision, saying, “I know people don’t like that I don’t do it. I’m fine with that. There is lots of stuff I do people don’t like, you know. I can live with it.”

Though usually strict about her policy, Goldberg has only strayed from it a few times: once on purpose when Trump was found guilty of 34 felony charges, and once unintentionally during a discussion after his debate with Joe Biden in June.

{Matzav.com}

Record Six Yarmulka Wearing Jews Elected To The New York State Legislature

The New York State legislature recently welcomed six elected officials:

Senator Simcha Felder serves the communities of Midwood, Madison, Boro Park, Homecrest, Gravesend, Marine Park, Sheepshead Bay, and Gerritsen Beach. A Certified Public Accountant, he also holds an MBA in Management from the Zicklin School of Business at CUNY’s Baruch College. Simcha, a lifelong resident of New York, lives near his childhood home with his wife and children. Known for his work on the City Council, Felder is widely respected among his conservative Jewish constituents for his advocacy and strong support for Israel.

Simcha Eichenstein, Assembly Member for District 48, represents Borough Park, Kensington, and Midwood. He began his career as an aide to political consultant Ezra Friedlander, later serving as a senior adviser to New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and as director of political and governmental services for New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio. A graduate of the local yeshiva system, Simcha lives in Borough Park with his wife and four children.

Sam Berger won a 2023 special election to fill the Assembly seat vacated by Daniel Rosenthal, who took a position with the UJA-Federation of New York. Representing New York’s 27th Assembly district as a Democrat, Sam is deeply rooted in the community he now serves. After studying in Israel, he returned to New York, where he earned a bachelor’s degree and later pursued law at St. John’s University School of Law in Queens. His legal experience includes externships with Kings County Surrogate’s Court and the Queens County Supreme Court – Criminal Term. Sam resides in Kew Gardens Hills with his wife and two daughters.

Ari Brown was elected to the New York State Assembly in a special election on April 7, 2022. With over 20 years of experience on the Board of Trustees for the Incorporated Village of Cedarhurst, Ari is also the Deputy Mayor of Cedarhurst and serves as the President of R. Brown Realty Corp, a design and build firm. Ari has lived in Cedarhurst for 30 years and is the father of seven children and grandfather to two.

Kalman Yeger serves on the New York City Council for the 44th district as a member of the Democratic Party. He began his career working as a community liaison and assistant to Councilman Lloyd Henry. A lifelong Brooklyn resident, Kalman holds a B.A. from Touro College and a J.D. from New York Law School, which he completed in 2011.

Aron Wieder was elected to the Rockland County Legislature in 2011 to represent Spring Valley. Currently the Chair of the Budget & Finance Committee, he also serves on the Government Operations, Multi-Services, Planning & Public Work Committees, and the Special Committee on Minority & Women’s Business Enterprise. Having resided in Rockland County for over 20 years, Aron lives in Spring Valley with his wife, a native of Rockland, and their four children. Originally from Brooklyn, he attended the Machzikei Hadas yeshiva before continuing his studies at a rabbinical college in Israel.

{Matzav.com}

Families of American Hostages Implore Trump to Work to Free Them

The families of the American hostages held in Gaza issued a statement today in response to the 2024 election results, marking nearly 400 days since Hamas militants captured hundreds of individuals, including seven Americans who remain in captivity.

“For 397 days, Americans– Omer, Edan, Judi, Gad, Keith, Sagui, and Itay– have suffered at the hands of Hamas terrorists in Gaza,” their statement reads. “As the United States prepares for a Presidential transition, we implore President-elect Trump and his transition team to work together with President Biden and his Administration officials to secure the immediate release of the hostages and end this nightmare for the hostage families, Israel, and the civilians of Gaza.”

The families stressed that the situation is “an urgent, catastrophic humanitarian crisis, not a partisan issue,” underscoring the need for unified action. “Our family members in captivity in Gaza need a bipartisan coalition of brave, committed leaders to bring them home,” they added. “The hostages cannot wait any longer. They are depending on us and on Republican and Democratic leaders to seize this moment.”

{Matzav.com}

Lakewood Shatnez Testers Issue Alert After Woolen Suit Found Containing Shatnez

In a new alert issued by Lakewood’s Shatnez testers, a woolen suit from the men’s brand Alesso was found to contain shatnez.

The suit, which is produced and sold by a Jewish-owned company, has sparked concern.

The discovery is significant because the fabric in question, which contains both wool and linen, qualifies as shatnez even if found in a suit made of polyester or other materials.

This revelation follows reports from shoppers who were assured by salespeople that the suit did not contain shatnez, highlighting the need for vigilance when purchasing clothing, particularly from Jewish-owned stores.

The alert serves as a reminder to the community that shatnez testing is an essential step before wearing any woolen or linen garment, and shoppers are urged to verify that all purchased clothing has been properly tested.

{Matzav.com}

Hezbollah Leader Says No Diplomatic Agreement Before Israel Ends ‘Aggression’

In a televised address on Wednesday, Naim Qassem, the newly appointed leader of Hezbollah, suggested that a diplomatic resolution to the ongoing conflict was still possible, but only if Israel halts its military operations in Lebanon.

This speech marked Qassem’s second public appearance since succeeding Hassan Nasrallah, who was killed in an Israeli attack in September. Qassem stated that hostilities would only cease once Israel stops its “aggression” against Lebanon, after which Hezbollah would be willing to engage in indirect negotiations mediated by its ally, Nabih Berri, the president of the Lebanese parliament.

“I will tell you very clearly, our conviction is that only one thing can stop this war of aggression, and that is the battlefield,” said Qassem in the pre-recorded message. He expressed skepticism that “political action” would lead to the end of the conflict, which has now lasted over a year.

“When the enemy decides to stop the aggression, there is a path for negotiations that we have clearly defined — indirect negotiations through the Lebanese state and Speaker Berri,” Qassem said. He emphasized that any potential negotiations would only move forward if they ensured “the protection of Lebanese sovereignty in full, without anything missing,” though he did not provide more specifics.

Qassem described Hezbollah’s involvement as a defensive struggle of attrition, noting that the group had been preparing for such a prolonged conflict since the conclusion of the Second Lebanon War in 2006.

“We have tens of thousands of trained resistance jihadi combatants that are ready to die as martyrs,” he asserted, emphasizing their ideological commitment, training, and weaponry. He made it clear that no area of Israel would be safe from Hezbollah’s attacks.

In response to Israeli actions, Qassem promised Hezbollah would continue launching rockets and drones at Israel, warning that the recent barrage was only a preview of what was to come.

During Qassem’s address on Wednesday, rockets fired from Lebanon targeted central Israel, triggering air raid sirens in various cities around Tel Aviv and causing damage without any reported casualties. By Wednesday afternoon, more than 120 Hezbollah rockets had been fired into Israel, according to the IDF.

Qassem accused Israel of seeking to defeat Hezbollah as part of a broader plan to take control of Lebanon and reshape the Middle East.

Hezbollah initiated the war on the northern front in October of the previous year, following Hamas’s large-scale attack on October 7. Since then, the group has consistently launched rockets, drones, and missiles at Israel. In September 2024, Israel escalated its campaign against Hezbollah, targeting its senior leadership and initiating a ground offensive aimed at dismantling Hezbollah’s extensive infrastructure in southern Lebanon.

Qassem addressed the heavy toll the war has taken on Lebanese civilians, framing it as a necessary cost for ultimate victory. He denied reports of tensions between displaced Shiites and other groups within Lebanon, despite evidence indicating otherwise.

Lebanese health authorities report that over 3,000 people have died in Israeli airstrikes on Lebanon over the past year, with the majority of casualties occurring in the last six weeks. While this figure includes both civilians and combatants, it is believed to be an underestimation. Hezbollah ceased regularly updating the number of its operatives killed following the surge in cross-border violence in September 2024. The IDF estimates that around 3,000 Hezbollah fighters have died in the past year.

Since the conflict began in October 2023, attacks on northern Israel have led to 40 civilian deaths. Additionally, 61 IDF soldiers and reservists have died in cross-border skirmishes and the ongoing ground operation in southern Lebanon, which began in late September.

Qassem also commented on the capture of a prominent Hezbollah naval figure by Israeli commandos in northern Lebanon, calling it a “humiliation” for Lebanon. He demanded that the Lebanese Armed Forces and the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), particularly the German contingent responsible for naval patrols, offer explanations.

Although Qassem recorded his address prior to the conclusion of the US election, he stated that the outcome of the vote would have no bearing on the war or any potential ceasefire discussions.

“We don’t base our expectations for a halt of the aggression on political developments… Whether [Kamala] Harris wins or [Donald] Trump wins, it means nothing to us,” Qassem said. “What will stop this… war is the battlefield.”

{Matzav.com Israel}

Matzav Inbox: The Real Reason Trump Won – And It’s Not What You Think

Dear Matzav Inbox,

 

As we look back on the outcome of the 2024 election, pundits are busy pointing fingers and analyzing strategies, trying to unravel how Donald Trump managed to win the presidency again. They’ll scrutinize swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan, calculating the precise factors that drove his victory, and they’ll dissect every misstep by the Kamala Harris campaign along the way.

Yes, analysts will say that Kamala lost Pennsylvania on account of the economy, as middle-class voters rejected the same broken promises they’d been fed for years.

They’ll argue that Wisconsin tipped because of voters’ disillusionment with Harris’s inability to provide a clear message on security and stability.

Then there’s Michigan, where policies on manufacturing jobs alienated the very people who built that state’s economy.

And who can forget Florida and Ohio, where talk of issues like law enforcement and border security struck a deep chord with local communities?

As for the campaign itself, it’s no secret that Harris struggled. Her strategy never fully resonated with the nation’s mood, her attempts to connect with key demographics fell flat, and her gaffes in public only fueled skepticism. Every time she seemed poised to regain traction, another blunder would surface, reinforcing the impression of a campaign in disarray.

But here’s the twist: none of that is actually why Donald Trump won. Strip away the analysis, the blunders, the states flipping red – because at the end of the day, there’s only one reason he became the 47th president of the United States.

He won because Hashem wanted him to.

Yes, the analysts will scratch their heads, debating the polls and the margins. But sometimes we forget that, above all the political maneuvering and back-and-forth, there is One who orchestrates the outcome. We saw it here: a candidate returning to office against all odds.

And that, dear readers, is the most significant message of all. When the will of Hashem intervenes, the path is set, and there’s no pundit, pollster, or strategist that can stand in the way.

Let this be a reminder to us all: beyond the noise and the headlines, there’s a Divine plan shaping events.

Yaakov M.

 To submit a letter to appear on Matzav.com, email MatzavInbox@gmail.com

DON’T MISS OUT! Join the Matzav Status by CLICKING HERE. Join the Matzav WhatsApp Groups by CLICKING HERE.

The opinions expressed in letters on Matzav.com do not necessarily reflect the stance of the Matzav Media Network.

Pages