Matzav

Federal prosecutors warned Thursday that an enormous share of the roughly $18 billion in federal funding directed to 14 Minnesota-administered programs since 2018 may have been siphoned off through fraud, calling the scope of the alleged theft unprecedented in size and complexity.

Speaking at a news conference in Minneapolis, First Assistant U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson said investigators are uncovering schemes that go far beyond routine billing abuses. Instead of inflated claims for real services, he said, some operators set up shell companies that provided nothing at all while billing Medicaid and spending the proceeds on international travel, luxury cars, and extravagant personal expenses.

“The magnitude cannot be overstated,” Thompson said. “What we see in Minnesota is not a handful of bad actors committing crimes. It’s staggering, industrial-scale fraud.”

According to Thompson, the losses are not abstract. He said the alleged fraud threatens critical services, including housing assistance for adults leaving addiction treatment programs and one-on-one therapy for children on the autism spectrum.

The latest disclosures come after years of federal investigations that began with the Feeding Our Future case, a $300 million scheme that prosecutors described as the largest COVID-era fraud involving child nutrition programs in the country. In that case, 57 defendants have already been convicted. Prosecutors say the nonprofit at the center of the operation exploited a state-run, federally funded program intended to provide meals to children.

From there, investigators began tracing money flows into other state programs. Thompson said the inquiry into Minnesota’s autism services grew directly out of the Feeding Our Future case.

“Roughly two dozen or so Feeding Our Future defendants were getting money from autism clinics,” Thompson said. “That’s how we learned about the autism fraud.”

On Thursday, prosecutors announced additional charges tied to the Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention program, which is designed to support children with autism. Court filings allege that a newly charged defendant approached parents in the Somali community to “recruit their children” for a clinic and paid kickbacks to inflate enrollment. Prosecutors say the clinic later submitted $6 million in Medicaid claims. In a related case, a woman previously charged in the same scheme pleaded guilty Thursday morning after allegedly receiving $14 million in reimbursements.

Authorities also unveiled new charges in a separate housing services fraud. Five defendants were charged with stealing funds meant to help Medicaid recipients secure stable housing. Thompson said one of those defendants left the country after his company was served with a federal grand jury subpoena.

Two of the newly charged individuals are Philadelphia residents accused of what Thompson described as “fraud tourism,” saying they viewed Minnesota’s Housing Stability Services Program as a source of “easy money.” Prosecutors allege they submitted $3.5 million in fraudulent claims. Those defendants join eight others charged in September in connection with the same program, which has since been shut down entirely.

Investigators are now examining yet another state-run initiative, Integrated Community Supports, which is intended to help adults with disabilities live independently. Authorities served a search warrant Thursday as part of that probe. Prosecutors noted that payments to providers are projected to reach $180 million this year, a dramatic increase from the program’s early years, prompting concerns that it too has been exploited.

“Every day, we look under a rock and find a new $50 million fraud scheme,” Thompson said.

The findings have added fuel to President Donald Trump’s criticism of Minnesota’s leadership. He has repeatedly labeled the state a center of financial crime, pointing to the fraud cases under Gov. Tim Walz, who was the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee in last year’s election.

Trump has also focused his attacks on Minnesota’s Somali community, the largest Somali population in the United States. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office for Minnesota, 82 of the 92 defendants charged across the child nutrition, housing, and autism-related cases are Somali Americans.

Last month, the rhetoric escalated after City Journal reported that taxpayer dollars from defrauded programs may have ended up benefiting al-Shabab, an al-Qaida affiliate. Thompson said funds sent overseas could have indirectly reached the group but stressed that investigators have found no evidence that defendants intentionally supported terrorism.

“There’s no indication that the defendants that we’ve charged were radicalized or seeking to fund al-Shabab or other terrorist groups,” Thompson said.

He added that large sums of fraudulently obtained money were sent abroad and used primarily for personal enrichment. Prosecutors said some defendants purchased real estate in Nairobi, Kenya, which has a large Somali diaspora. In other cases, one Feeding Our Future defendant spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on an aircraft in Nairobi, another wired $1.5 million to China and Kenya while texting that he had invested $6 million in Kenya, and another bought coastal property in Alanya, Turkey.

Despite Thompson’s statements, Trump has continued to use inflammatory language, referring to the Somali community as “garbage” and saying he does not want immigrants from Somalia in the United States. Community leaders say the comments have intensified fear and anger.

At the state level, Walz has taken steps to respond. In October, he ordered a third-party audit and paused payments to the 14 high-risk Medicaid programs for 90 days.

“We will not tolerate fraud, and we will continue to work with federal partners to ensure fraud is stopped and fraudsters are caught,” Walz said in a statement Thursday.

Last week, Walz appointed a statewide director of program integrity tasked with identifying and preventing fraud. Still, Republican lawmakers have continued to fault his administration, arguing that the failures allowed billions of taxpayer dollars to be misused before authorities intervened.

{Matzav.com}

A court in Nanterre, outside Paris, handed down a two-and-a-half-year prison sentence on Thursday to a 42-year-old Algerian woman who worked as a nanny and was convicted of poisoning the parents of Jewish children in her care, according to AFP. Alongside the custodial sentence, judges ordered her barred from entering France for five years.

The panel also convicted the woman of possessing and using a forged Belgian identity card, a separate offense uncovered during the investigation.

Judges described the crimes as a grave violation of the family’s confidence, with the presiding judge calling the conduct a “major betrayal of trust” against the parents of children who were then aged 2, 5, and 7.

Despite disturbing elements raised during the probe, the court declined to classify the case as aggravated by antisemitism. The judges said that statements attributed to the defendant emerged later in the investigation and were not made in the presence of her lawyer, preventing them from being used to support that charge.

The case stemmed from events in 2024, when the parents began noticing unusual and alarming signs inside their home. In January, they contacted authorities after discovering that a bottle of grape juice reeked of bleach and that the mother experienced severe eye pain after using her makeup remover.

Investigators determined that several household items had been deliberately tainted. During questioning, the nanny acknowledged that she had poured cleaning substances into bottles of alcohol owned by her employers. At that time, she told police she “never should have worked for a Jewish woman.”

At trial, however, the defendant reversed course. She told the court that the incriminating statement was fabricated under pressure during interrogation and insisted that her actions were not motivated by antisemitism.

{Matzav.com}

TikTok has finalized an agreement to separate its US business into a newly formed company controlled by American investors, according to an internal company memo first reported Thursday by Axios.

The arrangement is expected to bring to a close a protracted battle between TikTok and Washington that has unfolded over several years, driven by US government demands that ByteDance, the app’s China-based parent company, relinquish control of its American operations due to national security concerns.

In a message to employees, TikTok CEO Shou Chew said the transaction is scheduled to be completed on January 22. The new company will operate under the name TikTok USDS Joint Venture LLC. Under the ownership structure outlined in the memo, Oracle, Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi-based MGX will together control 45 percent of the venture. Affiliates of existing ByteDance investors will retain close to one-third of the company, while ByteDance itself will hold just under a 20 percent stake.

According to Axios, the US-based entity will assume full authority over sensitive areas including data security, protection of the algorithm, content moderation, and software integrity. The memo states that the company will place special emphasis on “retraining the content recommendation algorithm on U.S. user data to ensure the content feed is free from outside manipulation.”

The document also notes that a “trusted security partner” will be tasked with auditing and verifying compliance with US national security requirements. Oracle is set to take on that role once the divestment is finalized.

The agreement follows legislative action taken shortly before Joe Biden left office, when he signed a law mandating a ban on TikTok if ByteDance failed to divest its US assets. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has issued multiple executive orders aimed at keeping the platform operating while negotiations moved forward.

Trump had previously backed a TikTok ban during his first term but later reversed course, promising to “save TikTok” during his campaign. He has credited the platform with helping him connect with younger voters and boost support in his victory over Democrat Kamala Harris in the November 2024 presidential election.

{Matzav.com}

Authorities say the man suspected of carrying out the deadly shooting at Brown University was discovered dead Wednesday night inside a storage unit in Salem, New Hampshire.

According to multiple law enforcement sources cited by Boston25 News, the gunman is “no longer with us.” Officials have not yet released details about how he died, and the circumstances surrounding his death remain under investigation.

Earlier in the evening, police converged on an Extra Storage facility in Salem after locating a vehicle they believed was connected to the suspect. The car reportedly matched the make and model of one seen near the Brown University campus at the time of the shooting, as well as near the Brookline location where MIT professor Nuno Loureiro was murdered.

The suspect is believed to have entered Brown’s Barus & Holley building on Saturday and opened fire inside a lecture hall. Two students were killed in the attack: Ella Cook, 19, a sophomore from Alabama, and Mukhammad Aziz Umurzokov, 18, a freshman described as an Uzbek American.

In addition to the two fatalities, nine other people were struck by gunfire during the attack. As of Wednesday, six of the wounded victims remained hospitalized, according to reports.

Investigators have not yet said whether the suspect’s death is being treated as a suicide or whether other factors may have been involved.

The Knesset moved forward with a disputed piece of legislation dealing with Jewish religious expression in public life, approving it in a 49–35 vote and sending it onward in the legislative process.

Opponents quickly charged that the proposal crosses into religious coercion, while its backers said it is meant to safeguard Jewish identity in the public sphere.

The bill, titled “Realization of Jewish Identity in the Public Sphere,” was introduced by Likud MK Galit Distel Atbaryan together with Otzma Yehudit MK Yitzchak Kroizer. Its stated aim is to guarantee that Jewish citizens can openly express their national and religious character without obstruction. Supporters argue that it formalizes protections for traditional Jewish observance in public settings.

Among its provisions are requirements that mezuzahs be affixed in public institutions and that public observance of Orthodox Jewish practices be shielded from interference. Actions that hinder such practices — including administrative or bureaucratic obstacles — could be treated as criminal offenses under the proposal. Public acts such as prayer and the donning of tefillin would receive explicit legal protection.

The bill also includes a highly contentious section that would require judges serving in civil courts to demonstrate proficiency in halacha as a condition for appointment. In addition, it assigns exclusive authority over disputes arising from the legislation to the Grand Rabbinical Court. If implemented, this clause would effectively block the appointment of any judge who failed to pass such an exam.

That aspect of the bill has drawn particularly sharp opposition. The Ministerial Committee for Legislation objected to the judicial provisions, and Distel Atbaryan indicated during a stormy Knesset debate that these elements are likely to be revised or removed during committee discussions.

Following its approval in a preliminary reading, the legislation is now slated to move to committee, where it will be prepared for the first of three required votes before it can become law.

The proposal has reignited long-standing tensions over religion and state in Israel. Similar disputes surfaced in September 2023, when mechitzos were erected during large Yom Kippur tefillah gatherings in Tel Aviv’s Dizengoff Square, defying a municipal ruling and triggering confrontations with secular activists.

Criticism of the bill has come from opposition lawmakers, civil rights and religious freedom groups, and, according to Hebrew media reports, Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara. While rabbinical courts already function within Israel’s judicial system — handling matters such as marriage, divorce, conversion, and inheritance — they do not currently hold authority over the secular court system.

{Matzav.com}

As the nation looks ahead to marking America’s 250th anniversary in 2026, a renewed debate is surfacing on Staten Island over whether the borough should once again pursue breaking away from New York City.

The discussion has gained momentum following the recent election of Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani. Although Mamdani secured more than half of the vote across the city, his support on Staten Island was far more limited, drawing just 23% there, while former Gov. Andrew Cuomo won 55% of the borough’s vote, underscoring the political divide.

Borough President Vito Fossella said the election results have prompted some residents to push for revisiting the idea of secession. “This is a number of people on Staten Island who want to pursue the secession question and determine the future of Staten Island in very short order,” Fossella said in an interview with 1010 WINS on Thursday.

The idea is hardly new. Staten Islanders previously voted on the issue in a 1993 referendum, when 65% supported seceding from New York City. Despite that result, the proposal stalled and was never advanced by lawmakers in Albany.

According to Fossella, dissatisfaction with citywide policies continues to drive interest in separation. “We talk about different things that happen across New York City. We don’t want them,” he said. “We get things we don’t want, and we don’t get things that we do want.”

He added that longstanding worries remain central to the debate. “There are concerns about public safety and what will happen,” Fossella said. “There’s always a concern about taxes and the services we get in return. So there’s a real palpable sense that secession might be the long-term solution for the people of Staten Island, and I think they deserve to have that conversation.”

Fossella also said he expects the incoming mayor to ensure that Staten Island receives equal treatment. “I’m a big believer that actions speak louder than words and the choices that are made really are more important than the rhetoric that’s on the table,” he said. “I will take the incoming mayor on his word that he wants to help. I hope he does.”

At the same time, Fossella acknowledged that any move toward secession would face significant hurdles. “I put more faith in the people of Staten Island than I do in leaders of other parts of the city to determine Staten Island’s fate,” he said. “But it’s not as easy as that. You can’t just wave a wand. There’s a legislative political process that needs to be addressed and followed, and I hope it doesn’t take years. We hope to get to it sooner rather than later.”

{Matzav.com}

Discussion on ABC’s “The View” on Thursday centered on President Donald Trump’s proposal to issue bonus payments to active-duty military personnel, with co-hosts offering sharply different reactions to the plan.

During the broadcast, Whoopi Goldberg voiced skepticism about the intent behind the proposal, suggesting it was designed to secure loyalty. She later said, “And what he’s doing now is he’s thinking, if I make sure the soldiers have what they need they’ll back me and what I want.”

The comments followed remarks Trump made Wednesday night announcing the initiative. He said, “Tonight, I am also proud to announce that more than 1,450,000 — think of this —1,450,000 military service members will receive a special, we call ‘warrior dividend,’ before Christmas, a warrior dividend in honor of our nation’s founding in 1776. We are sending every soldier $1,776. Think of that, and the checks are already on the way. Nobody understood that one until about 30 minutes ago.”

Goldberg questioned whether the payments would actually materialize, telling viewers, “Let’s see if they get the check. I want to see if they get it first.”

Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin acknowledged the benefit to service members, saying, “The one thing I’ll give him credit is bonus to troops and giving them $1700.”

Griffin went on to argue that while the money could provide short-term relief, it did not address broader economic concerns. “Listen, coming off the government shutdown and the delay that they all had — they got back pay — but people need help. But all Americans need help right now and just a handout isn’t the answer. Smart policies are the answer,” she said.

{Matzav.com}

The Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok chassidus has launched a fundraising effort to support its yeshiva ketanah, announcing a rare raffle centered on a silver yarmulka worn by the Rebbe last Shabbos Chanukah.

Leaders of the chassidus say the initiative is aimed at strengthening the yeshiva for younger bochurim, which serves the entire kehilla. In recent weeks, significant efforts have been underway to stabilize and expand the institution so it can continue providing a strong Torah framework for the chassidus’ youth.

The institutions of Toldeos Aharon Yitzchok are overseen by R’ Mordechai Webberman and R’ Binyamin Monderer, who manage the talmud Torah, the yeshiva gedolah, and the girls’ educational framework. They have now also assumed responsibility for sustaining the yeshiva ketanah. According to an announcement made to the public, the administration committed to covering half of the yeshiva’s expenses, while the parents’ committee undertook responsibility for the remaining half.

As part of the fundraising campaign accompanying the establishment of the yeshiva ketanah, the chassidus will conduct a special raffle featuring a yarmulka made of pure silver that was worn by the Rebbe on Shabbos Chanukah.

Donors who contribute at least 200 shekels per month for 24 months will be entered into the raffle once, while those who pledge 500 shekels per month for the same period will receive five entries.

{Matzav.com}

A familiar sight from decades past — friends and family walking travelers all the way to the gate — is beginning to reappear at a handful of U.S. airports, as select facilities introduce programs allowing limited post-security access for non-travelers.

Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport in California announced this week that it is launching a guest pass initiative that permits “non-passengers” to enter secured areas of the terminal. The move marks a notable shift from strict post-9/11 security norms that have long restricted gate access to ticketed travelers only.

According to the airport, visitors who want to accompany departing passengers must apply online for security approval, which can be submitted up to seven days before the intended visit. Once the application is reviewed, the Transportation Security Administration will issue an OAK guest pass to approved applicants.

Those granted access will be required to present the guest pass along with a TSA-approved photo ID, such as a passport or Real ID, before proceeding through security. The airport notes on its website that approved guests may enter the post-security side of the terminal to spend time with loved ones prior to departure.

For many travelers, the change revives memories of a very different airport experience. Before 2001, airports across the United States generally allowed anyone — even without a boarding pass — to pass through security checkpoints and wait at the gate. That changed after the Sept. 11 terror attacks, which led to the creation of the TSA and the introduction of federal regulations limiting access to secured areas exclusively to ticketed passengers.

Oakland is not alone in revisiting that earlier model. Several other airports have already implemented similar programs, while additional facilities are considering doing so. Cleveland Hopkins International Airport offers a “hangout pass,” San Antonio International Airport operates a “SAT Pass,” and Kansas City International Airport provides its own “guest pass.” Philadelphia International Airport has introduced a “wingmate pass,” while Detroit Metropolitan Airport issues a “destination pass.”

The return of limited gate access has stirred nostalgia among travelers online. In the “r/travel” forum on Reddit, one user asked, “How was airport security before 2001?” The question prompted a flood of recollections from users who remembered a more communal airport atmosphere.

“One of the biggest differences is that unticketed people could come with you, so family could accompany you to the gate,” wrote one commenter. Another responded, “One of my fondest memories is seeing my grandma as I exited the plane with my brother when my parents sent me out to see her.”

Others recalled airports as social spaces in their own right. “Going to the airport to watch planes was a big deal. Anytime one had to fly, or a friend or family member [was flying off], a whole group would accompany the traveler/s just to get there early and watch planes take off and land,” one user wrote. Another added, “You could go to the airport just to hang out, even if you had no travel plans.”

Some commenters contrasted those memories with the modern experience. One person reminisced about “being able to see people off at the gate (or vice versa). Now you have to say your goodbyes, then walk half a mile to your gate alone.” The same user noted that “being able to greet someone at the gate was nice.”

Oakland officials emphasized that the new access policy is not guaranteed to remain in place permanently. The airport stated on its website, “The OAK Guest Pass is not a permanent program.” The notice adds that, “In response to exigent circumstances or operational needs, the Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to cancel the program, cancel approved OAK Guest Passes or modify program rules at any time without prior notice.”

Attorneys for former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett have filed a police complaint against political social media activists, accusing them of spreading content taken from Bennett’s Telegram account that allegedly leaked following an illegal hacking incident.

According to the complaint, the materials were knowingly distributed after being obtained through criminal means, in violation of the law. Bennett’s lawyers argue that the dissemination of the messages is especially serious given the sensitivity of an election year and its potential impact on public opinion.

The complaint states that distributing materials obtained through unlawful wiretapping constitutes a serious criminal offense, punishable by up to five years in prison. Among those named are social media activist Ido Gavoni and an individual identified as Gor Ben Ze’ev, who allegedly shared screenshots of purported correspondence between Bennett and his former adviser, Shimrit Meir.

Investigative sources said the matter is being handled by the Shin Bet. Authorities believe the breach was limited to Bennett’s Telegram account and did not involve access to his personal phone. The complaint was also forwarded to the State Attorney and to the head of the police investigations and intelligence division, with Bennett’s legal team stressing that the incident represents an improper attempt to use a criminal hack to influence the democratic process.

{Matzav.com}

The Anti-Defamation League said that a senior hire announced by New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani had published antisemitic remarks on social media more than ten years ago.

On Tuesday, Mamdani selected Catherine Almonte Da Costa to serve as director of appointments in his incoming administration. Da Costa previously held a similar role during Mayor Bill de Blasio’s tenure.

According to the ADL, it uncovered posts from Da Costa’s X account written in 2011 and 2012 that contained antisemitic language.

Among the posts cited by the organization was the statement, “Money hungry Jews smh.” The abbreviation “smh” refers to “shaking my head.”

The ADL said Da Costa also wrote, “Promoted to upstairs office today! Working alongside these rich Jewish peeps,” as well as, “Far Rockaway train is the Jew train.”

Shortly after the ADL made the posts public, the X account was removed.

In response, the ADL said, “We appreciate Da Costa has relationships with members of the Jewish community, but her posts require immediate explanation — not just from Ms. Da Costa, but also from the Mayor-Elect.”

The controversy followed another incident involving Mamdani’s team, after a separate staff member issued an apology last month for past social media posts that portrayed Israel in a demonizing manner.

Mamdani’s transition operation has also drawn scrutiny for including Women’s March leader Tamika Mallory, who has been accused of engaging in antisemitic conduct.

{Matzav.com}

President Donald Trump said the White House had not officially arranged a meeting with Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, even as he indicated that the Israeli leader was eager to meet and that a visit was likely to take place in Florida.

Asked in the Oval Office whether Netanyahu would be coming to Mar-a-Lago later in the month, Trump replied, “We haven’t set it up formally, but he would like to see me,” adding, “He’ll probably come to see me in Florida.”

Despite repeated briefings from Netanyahu’s office over more than a week asserting that a meeting was scheduled for December 29, the White House had not issued any formal confirmation.

During the same exchange with reporters, Trump was also questioned about the possibility of Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi joining the gathering in Florida. Trump responded warmly, saying, “I’d love to have him. El-Sissi is a friend of mine.”

According to a US official quoted by The Times of Israel, Washington had been exploring the idea of hosting a three-way meeting involving Trump, Sissi, and Netanyahu. The official said US officials believed progress toward that goal was made after American mediation helped persuade Israel to move forward with a major gas agreement with Egypt, following months of hesitation by Netanyahu.

However, the same official said Egypt showed significantly less interest in such a summit, citing ongoing objections to Israel’s actions in Gaza and reluctance to offer Netanyahu a political advantage during an election year.

{Matzav.com}

Authorities are investigating two separate acts of vandalism aimed at the Chabad Jewish Center at Michigan State University, incidents that unfolded just days apart and are being treated as hate crimes.

According to police, a swastika was spray-painted on the building, an act first reported by the Lansing State Journal. Law enforcement officials said the vandalism is under investigation as a hate-motivated incident.

Earlier in the week, the Chabad center disclosed on social media that a stone was hurled at one of its windows in the early hours of Tuesday morning. The center said no one was inside the building at the time, and the reinforced glass prevented damage.

The attacks in Michigan come amid a broader wave of antisemitic violence. This week alone, a mass shooting in Sydney, Australia targeted a Chabad event, and members of the Jewish community were assaulted in two separate incidents in New York City.

{Matzav.com}

Senior police officials and political leaders sharply condemned violent disturbances in Yerushalayim on Thursday after clashes between police and hundreds of chareidi youths left 13 officers wounded and led to multiple arrests.

Police Commissioner Danny Levy described the events as a “very grave incident,” pledging that authorities would “hold everyone involved to account.” His remarks came after officers were pelted with stones and other objects, a police vehicle was overturned, and riot-control measures, including tear gas and stun grenades, were deployed to regain control.

According to police, the unrest erupted following an incident involving a municipal parking inspector who was attacked while carrying out his duties. Two young men allegedly assaulted the inspector, kicking him and threatening to kill him, telling him they would “slaughter” him if he returned to the area. Officers responding to the scene detained one of the suspects, a move that quickly inflamed tensions in the neighborhood.

As word spread of the arrest, hundreds of young men surrounded the police in an attempt to free the detainee, and the situation rapidly escalated into full-scale rioting. Five of the injured officers were taken to hospital for treatment, while police confirmed that four suspects had been arrested by early evening.

Hebrew media reported that officers on the scene identified the initial assailants as draft evaders and attempted to transfer them to Military Police custody. Police statements, however, attributed the outbreak of violence solely to the parking enforcement incident and did not confirm whether draft evasion played a role.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir, who oversees the police, issued a strong condemnation, saying he “unequivocally condemns the extremist rioting in Yerushalayim,” and warning that attacks on police officers crossed a “red line.”

Opposition Leader Yair Lapid leveled harsh criticism at the government, calling the events an “inconceivable failure of the government” and a sign of the “disintegration of government institutions.” In a statement, he said, “It’s unfathomable that chareidi draft evaders can avoid arrest just because they are engaging in violence. The defense minister and prime minister continue to encourage an enterprise of [draft] evasion and refusal on historic scales.”

Lapid’s comments also referred to separate overnight confrontations in Ramat Hasharon and Herzliya, where dozens of chareidi protesters blocked Military Police from detaining draft evaders.

Channel 12 reported that Wednesday night’s protests marked the third time this month that demonstrators had successfully prevented arrests of yeshiva students.

Additional condemnation came from across the political spectrum. Yisrael Beytenu leader Avigdor Liberman labeled the Yerushalayim riot “an act of terrorism in every sense,” writing on X, “This is what happens when the country’s leadership is in the pocket of chareidi wheeler-dealers,” and adding that “patience has run out and the excuses are over, the nation demands enlistment for everyone!”

Democrats party chairman Yair Golan also blamed the government, saying the violence showed that “the draft dodgers understand that the law in Israel does not apply to them, that everything is permitted to them — and this is how it looks.” He added, “The backing for [draft] evasion, and for violence against security forces, comes from above. The prime minister and defense minister are responsible for these shocking scenes. It is time to draft everyone and restore law and order in Israel, for the sake of Israel’s security.”

{Matzav.com}

A social media post by Yesh Atid MK Naor Shiri ignited sharp criticism on Thursday after he issued a harsh call directed at protesters confronting Israeli security forces.

The remarks came in the wake of demonstrations in which chareidi protesters hurled stones at IDF soldiers and police officers, an image that sparked outrage across parts of the political spectrum.

In the post, Shiri wrote: “Every protester who throws a rock at an IDF soldier has to end the day with a bullet in his knee. No less,”

Within roughly an hour, the MK removed the statement and sought to clarify his position. In a follow-up message, he wrote: “I deleted the post. The image of soldiers and police officers in Israel being stoned is unfathomable and is like a terrorist incident to me.”

Shiri went on to stress that the consequences of such actions could be far more severe, adding, “If a rock had hit a soldier and he had been injured, G-d forbid, the discussion about the limits of protest would certainly be completely different.”

Addressing the decision to take the post down, Shiri explained that his intent was not to inflame tensions with the chareidi public. “I deleted it because our country is on the precipice, and the purpose of the post was not to be hateful of the chareidim.”

{Matzav.com}

Palestinian Authority chief Mahmoud Abbas praised the Oct. 7, 2023, massacre, calling it “the greatest day in Palestinian history,” Palestinian researcher Hani al-Masri said in a recent interview.

Al-Masri, the director general of Masarat—The Palestinian Center for Policy Research and Strategic Studies—spoke when asked by Palestinian content creator Ahmad Biqawi in a YouTube interview posted on Dec. 11 how Ramallah reacted on the morning of the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel.

“This is the ‘authority’ people want the ‘Palestinian Authority’ to be? A terror-worshiping authority,” Israel’s Foreign Ministry said in an X post on Wednesday, accompanying the relevant clip from the interview. The ministry noted that al-Masri is also a member of the Board of Trustees at the Yasser Arafat Foundation, saying he “knows a thing or two about the P.A.”

Al-Masri also said that the P.A. is continuing terror payments to the families of prisoners and “martyrs,” despite commitments to the European Union and the United States to end its “pay-for-slay” policy.

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar highlighted the continuation of the P.A.’s payments policy in an X post on Wednesday, accusing Abbas of once again lying about ending the practice. He added that the P.A. is disguising payments to released murderers as pensions for members of the Palestinian Security Services.

“This is distorted. End ‘pay-for-slay’ now!” Sa’ar wrote.

{Matzav.com}

[Video below.] Just as countries must have borders to exist, the conservative movement needs to delineate what is beyond the pale, and the latter includes Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host who has both denounced core conservative tenets of late and given voice to and failed to denounce antisemites and Holocaust deniers.

That was one of the messages Ben Shapiro, a Jewish conservative commentator and Daily Wire cofounder, shared in a Dec. 17 book talk with Kevin Roberts, president of Heritage Foundation.

Roberts has drawn criticism after failing to denounce Carlson, and a panel on Jew-hatred that used to be at the think tank has, at least temporarily, suspended its connection to Heritage, and several board and staff members at the think tank have resigned or left their positions.

Shapiro advised the think tank to part ways with Carlson, whom he called the “elephant in the room.” The Jewish commentator was there ostensibly to discuss his new book, Lions and Scavengers: The True Story of America (and Her Critics).

“If Heritage Foundation wishes to retain its status as a leading thought institution in the conservative movement, it must act as ideological border control,” Shapiro told attendees. “It must continue to draw the contours of legitimate, real conservatism. This is what the institution exists to do.”

Shapiro said conservatism’s top priority is “truth, not friendship,” calling Carlson “an opponent of conservatism, an outsider masquerading as an insider and destroying the character of the conservative movement in the process.”

That call for daylight between Heritage and Carlson came as two of the think tank’s board members, Shane McCullar and Abby Spencer Moffat, stepped down as trustees after Roberts defended Carlson and his softball interview with Holocaust denier and racist podcaster Nick Fuentes.

McCullar said, “No institution that hesitates to condemn antisemitism and hatred, or that gives a platform to those who spread them, can credibly claim to uphold the vision that once made the Heritage Foundation the world’s most respected conservative think tank,” Mediate reported.

And Moffat said the think tank had forfeited “the moral authority on which its influence depends,” the outlet said.

Shapiro said Carlson “sounds so much” like a socialist, has foreign policy views that are “idiocy” and has “glazed” the Iranian president “repeatedly” in interviews.

Carlson treated Qatar “as America’s foremost ally in the Middle East” and has a “peculiar obsession” with Israel, according to Shapiro, who noted that the podcaster has called Christian Zionism a “heresy.”

“He is mostly lying when he says that he is doing all of this in the name of a conservatism that does not resemble conservatism,” Shapiro said.

After the speech, Shapiro sat down with Roberts to talk about his book. “We love robust debate,” Roberts said, without addressing the institution’s support of Carlson directly.

“And surprises,” Shapiro quipped. JNS

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

The U.S. State Department announced on Thursday that it imposed sanctions on two judges on the International Criminal Court over their role in affirming an investigation into what it alleges are Israeli war crimes in Gaza.

Gocha Lordkipanidze, a Georgian national, and Erdenebalsuren Damdin, a Mongolian national, voted in the ICC’s appeals chamber on Monday to uphold the investigation, ruling that the examination of Israel’s conduct in Gaza since Oct. 7 fell within the scope of the ICC’s wider probe from 2021 looking at all Israeli treatment of Palestinians in Gaza, eastern Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria since 2014.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio stated that the sanctions are part of an American policy to reject the ICC’s claims of jurisdiction over countries like the United States and Israel that are not party to the Rome Statute, which created the ICC.

“These individuals have directly engaged in efforts by the ICC to investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute Israeli nationals, without Israel’s consent, including voting with the majority in favor of the ICC’s ruling against Israel’s appeal on Dec. 15,” Rubio said.

“The ICC has continued to engage in politicized actions targeting Israel, which set a dangerous precedent for all nations,” he added. “We will not tolerate ICC abuses of power that violate the sovereignty of the United States and Israel and wrongly subject U.S. and Israeli persons to the ICC’s jurisdiction.”

Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu welcomed the decision on Thursday.

“As long as the ICC refuses to abide by its own rules of complementarity or to accept that it has no jurisdiction over non-member states, it cannot be treated as an institution of law,” Netanyahu stated.

“Rather it must be viewed and treated for what it is: a hostile political body dedicated to destroying the nation-state system, first and foremost by unlawfully pursuing false prosecutions against the State of Israel and the United States of America,” he said.

U.S. President Donald Trump issued an executive order in February directing the secretaries of state and treasury to impose sanctions on anyone involved in the ICC’s efforts to “investigate, arrest, detain or prosecute” U.S. citizens or the citizens of U.S. allies not party to the Rome Statute, including Israel.

The ICC, which is based in The Hague, is an independent body which is not part of the United Nations.

With the additions of Damdin and Lordkipanidze, the Trump administration has now sanctioned eight ICC judges, its chief prosecutor Karim Khan, two deputy prosecutors, three Palestinian NGOs and Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur on Palestinian rights.

U.S. sanctions typically have the effect of locking targets out of any financial institutions or businesses that have U.S. operations or that transact in U.S. dollars, including most of the global banking system.

Khan has reportedly lost access to his Microsoft email work account at the ICC and his bank accounts have been closed. Khan temporarily stepped aside from his role in May over allegations of sexual harassment. He denies the claims.

Canadian ICC judge Kimberly Prost told the Associated Press earlier this month that after she was designated for U.S. sanctions she also lost access to her credit cards and Amazon’s Alexa virtual assistant.

“Your whole world is restricted,” she said. JNS

{Matzav.com}

Hours after banning use of the phrase “Globalize the intifada” at protests, police in London arrested four people for using it at an anti-Israel rally on Wednesday night.

The arrests in front of the Ministry of Justice headquarters in London at a Palestine Coalition protest were for “racially aggravated public order offences, all involving the alleged shouting or chanting of slogans involving calls for intifada,” the Metropolitan Police said in a statement. A fifth arrest was made “for obstruction of a constable.”

The Metropolitan Police and police in Manchester announced on Wednesday that the slogan “Globalize the intifada” will be considered hate speech and that people using it will face arrest.

The arrests follow a tightening of the enforcement of hate speech laws following the murder of 15 people at a Jewish community Chanukah candle lighting event on Sydney’s Bondi Beach. The slogan “Globalize the intifada” was a staple chant at countless anti-Israel events in Sydney since Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas invaded Israel and triggered a regional war.

Jonathan Sacerdoti, a British-Jewish journalist and pundit, on Thursday welcomed the arrests but said they came belatedly and as part of a response that was too weak to confront the threat facing British Jews.

“The announcement [about banning the ‘Globalize the intifada’ slogan] has been framed as a response to a ‘changed context.’ But what it actually represents is an admission, belated and heavy, that the authorities spent years refusing to see what was directly in front of them,” Sacerdoti wrote on Substack.

He noted that many Jews and others understand the phrase as a call to repeat terrorist attacks carried out in Israel against Jews and others worldwide. The meaning of the words has not changed, he added, and the shift in the police’s enforcement “occurred in the difficulty to deny the truth brought about by the death of 15 more innocents slaughtered by Muslim terrorists.”

Police on Wednesday also prevented the Palestine Coalition protesters from gathering near Trafalgar Square, Whitehall, Parliament Square and surrounding areas, as well as in the area north of Oxford Circus, citing planned Chanukah candle lighting events. The protesters were allowed to gather only near the Justice Ministry’s headquarters.

Many Australian Jews and others have blamed the Canberra government for inaction in the lead-up to the Bondi Beach massacre, which a Pakistani man and his Australia-born son were filmed perpetrating. Australian authorities said the alleged perpetrators had ties to jihadists from the Islamic State terrorist group.

Palestine Coalition is an umbrella group uniting several anti-Israel organizations, including the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), Stop the War Coalition and the Friends of Al-Aqsa.

British authorities have faced allegations of inaction, though they have taken steps that Australian counterparts had not. In July, the government banned the activities of a different group, Palestine Action, over its involvement in repeated break-ins of facilities tied to Israel, sometimes through use of violence against police and security officers.

Hundreds of Palestine Action activists have been arrested for expressing public support for the proscribed group. Several Palestine Action activists who are in prison for violence and breaking and entering have gone on a hunger strike, and some rally organizers have been holding protests not only against Israel, but also for the release of the imprisoned activists. JNS

{Matzav.com}

Law enforcement officials are looking into whether two fatal shootings at prominent New England academic institutions may be connected, sources told The NY Post.

The incidents occurred within a short span of time and geographic proximity, prompting investigators to consider a possible relationship between the cases.

On Monday night, MIT nuclear science professor Nuno Lourerio, 47, was found shot to death inside his Brookline, Massachusetts townhouse, a property valued at about $1.4 million.

Just two days earlier, an unidentified gunman opened fire during a final exam review session at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. The Shabbos afternoon attack left two students dead and nine others injured.

The two crime scenes are located less than 50 miles apart.

At this stage of the investigations, authorities have not identified any suspects in either shooting.

{Matzav.com}