Feed aggregator
Marines Give Highest Noncombat Medal To Family Of Osprey Crew Chief Who Died Trying To Save Pilots
Speaker Johnson Sets House Vote On Government Funding Bill After A One-Week Postponement
Wikipedia Defines Zionism as ‘Colonialism,’ Sparking Outrage
A heated debate has erupted on social media over recent changes made to the Wikipedia entry for Zionism, sparking accusations of historical revisionism.
Users on social media have over the past several 24 hours posted a comparison between the 2023 and 2024 versions of the Wikipedia page, with one user, Liv Lovisa, claiming that “history is being rewritten.”
Blake Flayton, a vocal commentator on Jewish and Israeli issues, responded to the post, calling the changes “egregious” and urging someone with expertise to edit the page to reflect what he considers to be a more accurate portrayal.
At the center of the debate are key changes in the language used to describe Zionism, the movement that called for the establishment of a Jewish homeland in what is now Israel.
The 2023 version of the page framed Zionism as a nationalist movement born in the 19th century that sought to secure Jewish self-determination. In contrast, the 2024 version of the entry introduces more charged terminology, describing Zionism as an “ethno-cultural nationalist” movement that engaged in “colonization of a land outside of Europe,” with a heightened focus on the resulting conflicts with Palestinian Arabs.
“Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible,” it reads.
Wikipedia lets editors who have gained status on its platform make changes according to various guidelines, which usually ensure a balanced approach. It is unclear what led to the sudden change in the definition.
On its website, Wikipedia says the following on its policies: “Wikipedia has no central editorial board. Contributions are made by a large number of volunteers at their own discretion. Edits are neither the responsibility of the Wikimedia Foundation (the organization that hosts the site) nor of its staff, and edits will not generally be made in response to an email request.”
Critics, including Flayton, argue that the new language in the Zionism entry distorts the historical narrative, positioning Zionism in a more negative light by drawing parallels to colonialism and downplaying the movement’s core goal of creating a safe homeland for Jewish people.
The use of the term “colonization,” in particular, has been a flashpoint, as it evokes a political context that some feel misrepresents the motivations behind the establishment of Israel and overlooks the historical persecution faced by Jews that led to the Zionist movement.
Another Twitter pro-Israel voice, Hen Mazzig, wrote: “The new Wikipedia entry on Zionism isn’t just inaccurate, it’s downright antisemitic. It asserts that the origin of Ashkenazi Jews is ‘highly debated and enigmatic,’ echoing Khazar theory, the dangerous lie that Ashkenazi Jews are converts and not descendants of the Jews exiled from the Land of Israel.”
He added, “This theory is often weaponized to call Israelis ‘colonizers’ and thus dehumanize us. In fact, Jewish history of repeated exile and migration from Israel to Europe is incredibly well-documented, as are genetic studies linking our people to the Middle East. Any balanced article discussing Jewish genetics and Israel would mention that. @Wikipedia has become a hate site. I hope they’ll change course.”
The uproar underscores broader concerns about the influence of Wikipedia, one of the most visited websites in the world, and the potential for bias or misinterpretation regarding politically sensitive topics like Zionism. As a public, user-edited platform, Wikipedia is often subject to scrutiny, especially when it comes to contentious issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. With millions of readers relying on the site for information, changes to entries like these can have significant implications for public understanding of historical events and modern geopolitical debates. JNS
{Matzav.com}
WATCH: Inside the Agudah: Mr. Moshe Davis
In this episode of Inside the Agudah, Mr. Moshe Davis, Executive Vice President of Agudath Israel of Illinois, sits with Rabbi Yitzchok Hisiger, Agudath Israel’s Director of Torah Initiatives, to discuss his work on behalf of the frum community.
R’ Moshe comes from three generations of community leaders. His grandfather, Rabbi Shlomo Davis, was one of the founders of Telshe Yeshiva in Cleveland and Telshe High School, serving as a member of the hanhalah for over 50 years. R’ Yosef Davis, R’ Moshe’s father, came to Chicago in 1964 to learn in Telshe Chicago, establishing a lifelong association with the yeshiva. Along with the Telshe rosh yeshiva, Rav Avrohom Chaim Levin zt”l, R’ Yosef became one of the founders of Agudath Israel of Illinois, serving as its president in the early years.
Continuing the family legacy of community involvement, R’ Moshe has served on the boards of directors of many local organizations over the last 25 years, including the Midwest Region of Agudath Israel where he started as Founding Chairman, the Jewish Federation and Jewish United Fund and the Associated Talmud Torahs. Most recently, he volunteered as a co-president of JDBY-YTT, the largest Jewish day school in the Midwest, for over 12 years. He has been on the board of JDBY-YTT for over 20 years, currently serving as its Chairman of the Board.
Prior to joining the Agudah in official capacity as its Executive Vice President in February 2022, R’ Moshe worked as a licensed professional and business owner in the healthcare and real estate industries. R’ Moshe and his wife Chevie currently live in Chicago.
WATCH:
Democracy Declined For 8th Straight Year Around The Globe, Institute Finds
VANCE UNLOADS: VP Candidate Blasts ‘Out of Control’ Rhetoric From Harris, Media Mob
In a lengthy X post, Vice Presidential candidate JD Vance blasted Democrats and the media mob for using dangerous rhetoric when criticizing former President Donald Trump.
Vance says the Left is “out of control.”
“Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that ‘Democracy is on the line’ in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck,” he continued. “He was obsessed with Ukraine’s ‘fight for Democracy’ and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. His name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones.”
Vance continued:
How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It’s a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris’s campaign surrogates have said things like “Trump has to be eliminated.” And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months?
NBC News called the attempted assassination a “golf club incident.” The LA Times told us “Trump Targeted at Golf Club.” The USA Today’s top of the fold headline is “Hope in America,” and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump “brings these assassination attempts on himself.” CNN’s Dana Bash–who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat–said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn’t motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly.
PBS’s weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris’s media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not–as the media suggested–a deranged Trump fan.
The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot.
This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent.
Read Vance’s full post below:
IRONIC: Nasrallah Ordered The Exploding Pagers To Replace Cellphones In Effort To Increase Security
24-hours a Day Non-stop Learning in Yerushalayim ?
Report: This Is How The Mossad Detonated The Hezbollah Beepers
Sky News Arabic reported on Tuesday evening that the Israeli Mossad is believed to be responsible for the recent explosions involving Hezbollah terrorists’ communication devices in Lebanon.
The report claims that Mossad planted explosive materials inside the batteries of the devices, later triggering them by increasing the temperature within the batteries.
It was also mentioned that the explosive materials had been placed in the devices prior to their arrival in Hezbollah’s possession.
A Lebanese security source, speaking to Al-Jazeera, confirmed that the beepers were rigged with explosives in advance, before they were distributed to Hezbollah. According to this source, each explosive charge weighed no more than 20 grams. Hezbollah reportedly received the devices about five months ago.
Some of the Hezbollah members noticed their devices were overheating and discarded them before the explosions occurred. Security camera footage captured the detonation of the devices and the resulting injuries to Hezbollah personnel.
As of now, reports suggest that more than 4,000 Hezbollah members have been injured in the incident. A Hezbollah source stated, “Israel hacked into the organization’s communication devices and blew them up.” Following the explosions, Hezbollah leaders instructed their members to dispose of the devices.
{Matzav.com Israel}
Judge Rejects Former Trump Aide Mark Meadows’ Bid To Move Arizona Election Case To Federal Court
Karine Jean-Pierre Says It’s OK To Call Trump A ‘Threat’ To Democracy Despite Murder Plots: ‘Jan. 6! Jan. 6! Jan. 6!’
White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre defended her choice to describe former President Donald Trump as a “threat” to democracy, specifically referencing his involvement in the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. She raised her voice and repeated the date multiple times when addressing the notion that such language might be fueling attempts on Trump’s life.
Jean-Pierre strongly criticized Trump, who is running for the Republican presidential nomination, by reiterating that he poses a danger to the democratic system. This came in response to a question from ABC News’ Selina Wang, who brought up Trump’s claim that the rhetoric against him was leading to efforts on his life, though Trump provided no evidence to support this assertion.
“President Biden has consistently been clear about the danger that the former president presents to our democracy,” Jean-Pierre stated. “He rejected the results of a legitimate election [in 2020] and incited 2,000 enraged individuals to go [to the US Capitol] in an effort to invalidate the outcome of a free and fair election.”
Jean-Pierre further emphasized that Trump’s criticisms wouldn’t deter the president or vice president from continuing to strongly speak out in defense of democracy. “We must be unwavering in our stance. We have to communicate this message with clarity,” she insisted.
The press briefing occurred just days after the arrest of 58-year-old Ryan Wesley Routh, who was found near Trump’s West Palm Beach, Fla., golf course with a rifle. This came after a July 13 incident in Butler, Pa., where a bullet grazed Trump’s ear and a rally attendee lost their life.
Routh had posted on X in April, using a phrase identical to one Biden and Harris have employed against Trump, stating that “DEMOCRACY is on the ballot.”
Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy confronted Jean-Pierre, questioning the appropriateness of her comments. “Just two days after another attempted assassination of Donald Trump, you’re here calling him a threat. How many more times does someone need to try to kill Trump before you reconsider your use of the word ‘threat’?” he asked.
Jean-Pierre responded forcefully, saying, “I completely reject the foundation of your question. The way you framed it is dangerous, especially with the American public listening,” she said, visibly upset.
She continued, saying that suggesting her remarks were stoking violence was unfounded, particularly when the administration had been explicit in condemning political violence. “What I have said about the former president concerning January 6 is based on facts,” she insisted.
Doocy pushed further, questioning if there was any worry that unstable individuals might take the White House’s rhetoric literally and act on it by attempting to harm Trump. “We are using specific examples,” Jean-Pierre responded, standing by her use of the word “threat.”
“We’re not just throwing this term around lightly. January 6, Peter. January 6. Do I need to keep repeating it? — January 6, 2021! That is a factual event, as documented,” she emphasized. Jean-Pierre also reiterated that the administration has condemned political violence repeatedly.
She concluded with a warning, urging caution in how questions were being posed. “We have to be mindful of the way questions are framed. People are watching, and what you said about us elevating political violence is concerning. This administration stands firm in its commitment to denounce any form of violent or inflammatory rhetoric,” she concluded.
{Matzav.com}
Lapid Discusses Hostage Deal with Obama in DC
Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid met with former U.S. president Barack Obama in Washington on Monday, with the two political leaders discussing advancing a deal to return the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza.
“I met with former President Barack Obama at his office in Washington,” the head of the Yesh Atid party tweeted on Tuesday morning.
“I thanked him for his public support and his efforts to secure the return of the Israeli hostages held in Gaza. I told him that we all need to work together to ensure a deal that will bring the hostages home,” he wrote.
Lapid also visited the White House on Monday, meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and U.S. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan to talk about the 101 hostages remaining in Gaza and a potential ceasefire agreement to secure their release after nearly a year of captivity.
He was also scheduled to meet on Monday with South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham during his D.C. diplomatic swing. JNS
{Matzav.com}
REWARD FOR HEZBOLLAH: MKs Call On PM To Revoke Israeli-Lebanese Gas Deal Signed By Lapid
Israel’s Nuclear Chief: Iran ‘Continues to Deceive’ the World
Iran continues to deceive the international community about the scope and aims of its nuclear activities, Israel Atomic Energy Commission director general Moshe Edri told attendees at the annual meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria on Tuesday.
“There is no doubt that Iran conducted a military nuclear program aimed to produce several nuclear-weapon devices. Iran continues to advance this program by gaining relevant technology and knowledge, along with fissile material in alarming amounts,” Edri said in a speech.
The Israeli official noted that despite repeated resolutions by the IAEA’s board of governors in recent months, Tehran has “continuously failed to provide technically credible explanations regarding these activities, and continues to deceive the Agency and the international community.”
The possibility of a nuclear-armed Islamic Republic is “not an option that Israel, or the world, can, or should tolerate,” he stated, noting that Iran continues to “develop, test and deploy” long-range ballistic missiles that it could utilize for a widespread nuclear attack on the Jewish state.
Meanwhile, the Syrian regime has “followed the footsteps of its close ally,” pretending to cooperate with the IAEA, “while not admitting the full facts and not providing true answers” regarding its clandestine reactor in the Deir Al-Zour region of eastern Syria, according to Israel.
The international community should “stand behind the IAEA” as it seeks to receive “clear, full explanations” on this from Damascus “once and for all,” Edri stated, echoing similar remarks made at the summit in 2022.
In his comments on Tuesday to the conference, Edri also noted the attacks launched on Israel by Iran and its regional terror proxies over the past months, some of which, he said, have “openly targeted” nuclear facilities.
The national task of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission “is to guarantee the safety and security of our nuclear facilities that are openly targeted by Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran—even more so since Oct. 7,” Edri said, in reference to the Hamas-led cross-border massacre of more than 1,200 people in the northwestern Negev.
“Israel continues to demonstrate its responsible behavior in this regard and continues to take all necessary precautions to ensure that these facilities are operated according to the highest international safety and security standards to withstand these threats as required,” he added.
Iran has continued to ramp up enrichment in recent months, while arguing that its nuclear program is strictly peaceful. Tehran’s stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium has increased by at least 20.6 kilograms (45.5 pounds) since February, AFP reported on May 27, citing an IAEA report.
The confidential document, which was also seen by the Associated Press, revealed that Tehran had accumulated 142.1 kilograms (313.2 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%. This level of enrichment is just a technical step from 90% enrichment, considered weapons grade.
According to the IAEA definition, it is technically possible to create an atomic bomb with roughly 42 kilograms (92.5 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60% if the material is further enriched to 90%.
Iran has recently threatened a push towards the weapon of mass destruction. On May 9, an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned that Iran would weaponize its nuclear program if Israel “threatens its existence.”
Also in May, a lawmaker close to the Iranian regime suggested that the regime might already possess an atomic bomb, saying: “In my opinion, we have achieved nuclear weapons, but we do not announce it.”
An expansion underway at the Fordow enrichment plant could allow Iran to accumulate several bombs’ worth of nuclear fuel every month, The Washington Post reported in June, citing confidential documents.
While Tehran has restricted the IAEA’s ability to monitor its nuclear program, inspectors witnessed technicians installing advanced IR-6 centrifuges, per a confidential file shared with the agency’s members.
(JNS)
Instagram Makes Teen Accounts Private As Pressure Mounts On The App To Protect Children
REVENGE THREAT: Hezbollah Warns Israel of ‘Fair Punishment’ After Lebanon Pager Explosions
The Hezbollah terror group formally blamed Israel for the pager blasts that wounded at least 2,700 and killed eight of its operatives in Lebanon on Tuesday, warning the Jewish state will get “its fair punishment.
“After examining all the facts and data about the attack, we hold the Israeli enemy fully responsible for this criminal aggression,” Hezbollah said in an official statement, according to a translation by Lebanon’s Al Mayadeen channel, which is affiliated with the terrorist organization.
The Hezbollah statement added, “This treacherous and criminal enemy will certainly receive its just punishment for this sinful aggression from where it expects it or does not expect it,” per Al Mayadeen.
More than 2,700 Hezbollah terrorists were wounded and at least eight were killed across Lebanon on Tuesday when their communication devices exploded, Lebanese Health Minister Firass Abiad confirmed.
Approximately 200 Hezbollah terrorists were in critical condition in 100 different hospitals, Beirut’s health minister announced some three hours after the explosions were first reported at 3.30 p.m. local time.
Senior Hezbollah officials were said to have been wounded in the blasts. Iran’s ambassador to Lebanon, Mojtaba Amani, was also hurt in one of the explosions, Tehran’s semi-official Mehr outlet reported.
In its first official statement on the incident, Hezbollah had said that the explosions, “the causes of which are still unknown,” killed at least three of its terrorist operatives, while wounding a large number of others.
The Israel Defense Forces declined to comment on the incident, which came just hours after the Israeli Cabinet added the return of citizens displaced from their homes in the north to the country’s war goals, bringing a potential major clash with Hezbollah closer to reality.
The IDF’s Home Front Command has reportedly informed local authorities of a possible escalation on the border with Lebanon but stressed that there are currently no changes to instructions for citizens. JNS
{Matzav.com Israel}
DRONES, RADAR & BARRIER: The IDF’s Plan To Tackle The Strategic Threat On Its Eastern Border
British Airways, Air France, Lufthansa Suspend All Flights To Israel
Israeli Rabbinate’s Mandate Voided, Prompting Renewal Push
Roughly two months after the expiration of the mandate of both of Israel’s chief rabbis, their acting replacement is also out of a title as of Monday, along with the rest of the Chief Rabbinate Council.
The result of a political power struggle between the Rabbinate and the High Court of Justice over women’s representation and the clergy’s independence, this development may affect kosher certification and several other areas of life in Israel unless it’s addressed soon, according to both critics and advocates of the Rabbinate.
By signing up, you agree to receive emails from JNS and allied pro-Israel organizations.
Beyond its practical implications, the temporary breakdown within the Chief Rabbinate underlines growing tensions between an interventionist judiciary that critics say is excessively liberal, and state-employed clerics who opponents say are too rigid and inattentive to the needs of the public.
On Monday, the government submitted a bill that would extend the mandate of the Chief Rabbinate’s Council, the Rabbinate’s governing body, until Dec. 31. Separately, elections for chief rabbis are scheduled to be held this month.
The Council lost its legal mandate because of the rabbinate’s refusal to hold elections under the terms dictated in January by the High Court of Justice. Ruling on a petition by a feminist group, the court cited equality grounds in ordering the Rabbinate to consider appointing women to an elections-related position that the Rabbinate designates for rabbis only. Women cannot serve as rabbis in Orthodox Judaism.
The Rabbinate declined to hold elections under those terms, leading to the expiration of the mandate of the Sephardic and Ashkenazi chief rabbis on July 1 without successors. The court appeared to back down from this demand, facilitating the scheduling of elections for later this month. Meanwhile, though, the mandate of the Council, whose makeup is also determined in the elections, expired on Sept. 16, voiding the authority of its chair from continuing to fulfill the duties of the chief rabbis.
The bill extending the Council’s mandate will ensure the saga’s resolution, Yehuda Avidan, the director-general of the Religious Services Ministry, told JNS on Tuesday. He blamed the “overzealous court” for the impasse and added that the Rabbinate’s handling of the situation blocked judicial encroachment without compromising people in need of the institution’s services.
At stake are important areas of life entrusted to the Rabbinate, which in Israel is a state organ. It regulates kosher certification, conversion to Judaism and family and marital issues for Jews through the rabbinical court system, which is part of the judiciary and functions as a family court.
Kosher meat certification will not be affected because certification crews are already overseeing the production abroad (Israel imports most of its meat), according to a source within the Rabbinate. The crews will complete their missions, and the Council will have regained its mandate by the time they return, the source assured JNS.
Ritual circumcision, or milah, as well as divorces and marriages, are handled by religious councils, which are local municipal branches of the Rabbinate, the source added. The expiration of the Council’s mandate does not affect the local branches’ work but it does prevent the appointment of new staff, according to the source.
“In essence, you have a small gap that will be resolved quickly and remain unnoticeable to those who rely on the Rabbinate’s services,” said Avidan.
Rabbi Seth Farber, founder of the Jerusalem-based ITIM nonprofit, which has been a longtime critic of the Rabbinate, said in a statement that the crisis “shows we need a profound change in the religious establishment so it would be better connected and more diverse, but we have to begin by making it compliant to the law.”
Avidan dismissed Farber’s criticism and defended the decision not to hold elections in the Chief Rabbinate under terms dictated by the court.
“It was a classic slippery slope. The court’s demand that women be appointed to a position reserved for rabbis would have created a precedent that before long would lead to new demands to appoint women city rabbis and ultimately women chief rabbis. We value women and respect them but this does not comply with Jewish tradition, whose preservation the Rabbinate is entrusted to maintain,” Avidan told JNS.
The Rabbinate this month agreed to hold elections on Sept. 29 in Jerusalem. The decision to hold elections followed a High Court of Justice ruling on Aug. 8 that effectively lifted the court’s previous requirement that women be considered to serve under the title of “rabbi” on the Chief Rabbinate’s electing assembly of 150 people.
In the context of a 1980 law regulating the Chief Rabbinate’s work, the designation of “rabbi” may apply also to women versed in Jewish law, the court ruled in January. The Rabbinate must therefore consider appointing women to a category of 10 rabbis whom chief rabbis may by law appoint to the electing assembly, according to the ruling. Its Aug. 8 ruling cleared the path for scrapping the entire category of 10 appointed rabbis and allowed an election with only 140 delegates.
Half of the remaining 140 delegates comprise 70 municipal rabbis affiliated with the Chief Rabbinate, who are all men. The other half is made up of delegates who are not rabbis, including mayors, lawmakers, cabinet ministers, and other public representatives, some of whom are women.
“The court eventually realized it could not coerce the Rabbinate to declare women as rabbis or consider them for rabbinical positions, opening the road to an election. Better late than never,” said Avidan. JNS
{Matzav.com Israel}