Feed aggregator

More than 22,000 New York City families will no longer have to pay anything out of pocket for subsidized childcare under a new initiative announced Thursday by Mayor Zohran Mamdani, marking another step in his push toward universal free childcare across the five boroughs.

Beginning next month, the city will pick up the weekly fees currently charged to families participating in the Child Care Assistance Program, eliminating the sliding-scale payments they make directly to childcare providers. City officials estimate the initiative will cost $5.2 million during its first year.

“For thousands of families, a weekly childcare fee means another bill they simply can’t afford. Making that care truly free can make all the difference,” Mamdani said in a statement.

“As part of our promise to deliver universal child care, we are eliminating these fees for families receiving childcare assistance across the city. No family should have to choose between staying in the city they love and affording care for their child. This is another step toward making affordable childcare something every New York family can count on.”

The move is part of Mamdani’s broader effort to establish free childcare throughout New York City. It also comes as the administration prepares to launch its first preschool initiative for 2-year-olds, which will provide participating families with free, year-round care for eight to 10 hours per day beginning this fall.

The Child Care Assistance Program, which receives most of its funding from the state, helps eligible families cover the cost of childcare and afterschool programs for children ranging in age from 6 weeks through 13 years.

Families generally qualify if their income is no more than 85% of New York’s median income. For a family of four, that translates to approximately $114,000 annually. Depending on household income, participating parents currently pay as much as $15 per week toward the cost of care.

“As we prepare to launch free 2-K this fall, we are making all publicly-funded care free for families,” said Emmy Liss, executive director of the Mayor’s Office of Child Care and Early Childhood Education.

More than 100,000 families currently participate in the voucher program. Families at the lowest income levels who receive public assistance already pay nothing themselves, leaving approximately 22,000 households that are currently responsible for weekly co-payments. Those are the families that will benefit directly from the new city funding.

The announcement comes even as the subsidized childcare system continues to face significant demand. More than 16,000 families remain on a waiting list for assistance because demand for vouchers has exceeded available state funding, despite increased investments in childcare by Gov. Kathy Hochul.

Supporters of universal childcare praised the city’s decision to eliminate the remaining fees, arguing that families receiving publicly subsidized care should not face different financial requirements depending on their circumstances.

“This move by the city brings us one step closer to treating childcare and early education like the public good that it should be,” said Ben Parisi, director of strategic campaign initiatives at The Action Lab, which organizes childcare providers advocating for universal childcare.

“We are glad to see a more equitable city that doesn’t charge some parents fees for public goods and not others.”

City officials said the administration is also planning for the policy to continue beyond its first year. An additional $6 million to cover families’ out-of-pocket childcare voucher expenses has already been incorporated into the baseline for the next fiscal year’s budget.

New York’s top judge has acknowledged that he crossed a line when he encouraged voters to remove judges who impose lengthy prison sentences, telling the state’s judicial watchdog that he should have chosen his words more carefully.

Chief Judge Rowan Wilson addressed the controversy while responding to an ethics complaint filed by Republican state lawmakers over remarks he made earlier this year at a CUNY Law School forum. During the event, Wilson criticized judges who hand down what he characterized as “stupid” long sentences and told attendees that voting such judges out of office was “something you can do for me.”

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct ultimately dismissed the complaint, but Wilson conceded in his response that his comments had been poorly framed.

“I wish I had been clearer,” Wilson wrote to the state Commission on Judicial Conduct, according to the commission’s dismissal letter.

Wilson explained that his remarks came after he heard about an unidentified judge who allegedly referred to a defendant as an “animal” and said the person should be “locked up” for the rest of his life before imposing sentence.

According to Wilson, his reaction was driven by his “extreme disgust of the comparison of human beings to caged animals.”

Wilson said that rather than personally encouraging the audience to vote against particular types of judges, he should have discussed more generally the authority voters possess to make those decisions.

“I should have said that the voters have that ability and should become informed and express their preferences through the electoral process,” Wilson wrote.

The controversy raised questions because judges are subject to stringent ethical restrictions concerning political activity and public political statements. Wilson’s comments about voting judges out of office formed part of the basis for the Republican lawmakers’ March complaint.

The Commission on Judicial Conduct, however, found no ethical problem with separate comments Wilson made at the same event advocating passage of the Second Look Act. The proposed legislation would allow certain convicted felons to seek a new sentencing hearing after serving 10 years.

“It is permissible for a Chief Judge, as leader of the Unified Court System, not only to advocate for but also to propose legislation concerning the law, the legal system and the administration of justice,” the CJC wrote.

Wilson has served as chief judge of the New York Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, since 2022. His office did not respond Wednesday to a request for additional comment.

Republican lawmakers who brought the complaint said they welcomed Wilson’s acknowledgment, even though the judicial commission declined to impose discipline.

State Sen. Anthony Palumbo (R-Suffolk), a former prosecutor who serves as the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the episode should serve as a warning about the importance of the chief judge’s public statements.

“I’m glad to see that Judge Wilson’s conduct was addressed, and that he will choose his words more carefully in the future. It’s unfortunate that those comments were made in the first place,” Palumbo said.

Assemblyman Michael Tannousis (R-Staten Island), another lawmaker behind the complaint, maintained that Wilson’s original remarks were improper.

“The Chief Judge’s comments were wholly inappropriate, seeking to galvanize opposition against judges with whom he does not agree,” Tannousis wrote in a statement.

Tannousis also questioned whether Wilson received more lenient treatment from the commission than another judge expressing different views might have received.

“Although I appreciate the Commission’s investigation into the matter, I question whether a deferential standard was applied here that would not have been applied to judges with an alternative point of view,” he said.

The dispute is not Wilson’s first high-profile controversy stemming from his judicial philosophy. Before becoming chief judge, Wilson drew attention for a dissent in the closely watched legal battle involving Happy, an elephant housed at the Bronx Zoo.

An animal-rights organization sought to use habeas corpus — a legal mechanism traditionally employed to challenge unlawful human detention — to obtain Happy’s release. Wilson sided with the group in dissent when New York’s highest court rejected the effort.

“We should recognize Happy’s right to petition for her liberty not just because she is a wild animal who is not meant to be caged and displayed, but because the rights we confer on others define who we are as a society,” he wrote at the time.

Since taking over New York’s judiciary, Wilson has participated in several major and politically charged cases. Among the most prominent was the Court of Appeals’ 2024 decision overturning Harvey Weinstein’s Manhattan sex-crimes conviction, with the court concluding that the trial judge had improperly allowed testimony concerning allegations that were not part of the charges being tried.