Debate Erupts Over Definition of “Chareidi”: Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee Grapples With Draft Law Criteria
A fresh clash emerged today in the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee as lawmakers revisited the proposed Security Service Law and confronted a charged question: Who qualifies as a “graduate of a chareidi educational institution” for the purposes of the draft?
The discussion, held today as part of ongoing deliberations on the draft law, centered on Section 26Yud-Beis, which determines how the state identifies chareidi conscripts, a classification that directly affects annual recruitment targets for chareidim.
Under the version currently on the table, anyone who attended chareidi educational institutions for at least two of the four years between ages 14 and 18 would be recognized as a chareidi graduate. This group forms the basis for the minimum yearly recruitment benchmark.
During the meeting, the committee’s legal advisers suggested narrowing the definition by counting only the years closest to the actual draft date. Their rationale: tightening the timeframe might better reflect the characteristics of the individual as they enter the IDF.
But Brig. Gen. Shay Taib, head of the IDF’s manpower support division (TOMCH”A), urged caution and objected to revisiting the definition at this stage. If the practical difference between the definitions is minimal, he argued, stability should take precedence. “There is value in continuity,” he said, noting that the Ministry of Education holds the necessary data to analyze any discrepancies.
Taib also raised a related, long-standing problem: the mechanism used to tally chareidi recruits. The current system relies on after-the-fact cross-checking — often sparking disputes and lengthy delays. “I propose that we do not count retroactively, but rather assign each conscript to a birth year grouping,” he said. “From the moment someone crosses age 18, it must be clear whether he is defined as chareidi under the law. Otherwise, we spend months arguing after the enlistment already happened.”
A representative of the Ministry of Education, Miriam Grazi Rosenbaum, rejected accusations that the ministry misclassifies institutions or mistakenly includes graduates of religious-Zionist yeshiva high schools as chareidi. She explained that every school is reviewed individually according to the relevant regulations, and when misunderstandings arose, the ministry clarified the data and provided the IDF with accurate, targeted information.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Defense signaled support for keeping the existing definition intact. Kobi Blitstein, the ministry’s deputy director general, said the current formulation maintains balance among different population groups — including youth who leave religious observance after years in chareidi schools, as well as baalei teshuvah who may enlist at a later age. He emphasized the importance of consistent data, comparability across years, and alignment with definitions used by the Civil Service Commission.
The committee is expected to continue debating the matter as the draft law advances, with the core issue still unresolved: how to determine, in a uniform and defensible way, who counts as chareidi for the purpose of national service requirements.
{Matzav.com}