Feed aggregator
Netanyahu Condemns ‘Fanatic Few’ Settlers for Attacking IDF; Lapid: ‘Jewish Terrorists’
Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu issued a strong rebuke on Monday following violent acts by Jewish extremists, including the torching of a military post and a riot outside an army base in the West Bank. The statement came hours after dozens of radical settlers clashed with security forces.
“No civilized country can tolerate violent and anarchic acts such as the burning of a military installation, damage to IDF property, and assaults on security personnel by citizens of the state,” Netanyahu stated in remarks distributed by his office.
He also urged authorities to investigate thoroughly and bring charges against those responsible, referring to them as “rioters.”
Netanyahu made clear that these violent individuals are not reflective of the broader settler population. Instead, he emphasized the positive role that settlers play in Israeli society.
“The settler community is a model and an example of developing the land, meaningful service in the IDF, and contributing to the cultivation of Torah scholars. We will not allow a violent and fanatic few to tarnish an entire community,” the prime minister said.
Defense Minister Israel Katz announced plans to convene an emergency meeting to address the situation and plot a strategy to contain future outbreaks of settler violence.
“This phenomenon must be put to an immediate end. We will take all necessary measures and completely uproot this violence. No one will dare raise a hand against IDF soldiers and members of the security forces,” Katz declared.
However, opposition lawmakers leveled fierce criticism at the government, accusing it of enabling extremism by coddling radical elements within the settler population.
Opposition Leader Yair Lapid bluntly labeled the perpetrators.
“These are Jewish terrorists, a gang of criminals, who feel they have the support of the coalition. Anyone who uses force against IDF soldiers should be dealt with to the fullest extent of the law,” Lapid said in an interview with Army Radio.
National Unity leader Benny Gantz pointed to what he described as the government’s role in undermining Israel’s law enforcement institutions.
“The event we witnessed tonight, which joins a severe wave of additional events, begins with a dangerous tailwind for violence and Jewish terrorism, blowing directly from ministers in the government,” Gantz said.
He added that verbal condemnation is insufficient without concrete measures to reverse the trend.
“From the deliberate weakening of the police, and attacks on the Shin Bet and the IDF instead of on the rioters. Mealymouthed condemnations will not stop the violence — only action will,” Gantz asserted.
Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar also weighed in, stating unequivocally that violence against the country’s security apparatus is intolerable.
“I strongly condemn the violence against the IDF and security forces. Such incidents are unacceptable and the perpetrators must be punished severely,” he said.
Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who had criticized IDF troops for their use of live fire against settlers just days earlier, appeared to shift tone, calling the recent actions a serious breach.
“Criminals are criminals are criminals in every place in the country,” he wrote on X.
“Violence against beloved IDF soldiers and the Israel Police and the destruction of property are forbidden and cross a red line,” Smotrich added, urging the police to apprehend those behind the attacks.
He further distanced the broader settler movement from those responsible for the incidents, saying these individuals do not reflect the values of most residents in the West Bank.
Likud lawmaker Avihai Boaron described the violent acts as “apparently illegal behavior,” but attempted to downplay their gravity by characterizing the perpetrators as disaffected youth.
He also pushed back against comparisons between the settlers and Palestinians who engage in stone-throwing attacks.
“A rock is a rock, but the throwing hand is not the same throwing hand — of course the intention is different,” Boaron said, cautioning against labeling extremist settlers as enemies.
The events unfolded overnight between Sunday and Monday, when dozens of Jewish radicals reportedly attacked a security facility and clashed with soldiers near a base in the West Bank. The attack came just days after a settler physically assaulted an IDF officer.
Some participants held signs branding an IDF commander a “traitor,” according to reports.
Military officials said that the rioters attempted to breach the perimeter of the Binyamin Regional Brigade base, hurled rocks, sprayed mace at soldiers, and punctured vehicle tires.
In a separate attack, settlers burned down a high-cost security installation near Ramallah, which the IDF said was key in preventing terror attacks and ensuring safety in the area.
The military warned that destruction of the post “poses a danger to the security of the residents.”
No arrests have yet been reported in connection with the violence. The Shin Bet has launched an investigation into the arson at the security installation.
The group responsible for rioting outside the army base had reportedly been protesting the military’s firing of warning shots at settlers who ambushed a patrol on Friday night — an incident that apparently resulted in a teenage boy being wounded.
Troops and police had been dispatched to an area near Kafr Malik after receiving intelligence that suspects were gathering there. The location had been declared a restricted military zone following an earlier attack by settlers in which three Palestinians were killed by IDF fire. Settlers had repeatedly tried to establish an unauthorized outpost on privately owned Palestinian land.
{Matzav.com Israel}
Iran Claims 71 Killed in Israeli Strike on Tehran’s Infamous Evin Prison
PRELUDE TO PEACE?: Trump Lifts Sanctions On Syria Ahead Of The Country Potentially Joining The Abraham Accords
Panel Votes To Impeach Arab MK Ayman Odeh, Paving Way For Possible Ouster From Knesset
Lawmakers on the Knesset House Committee voted overwhelmingly on Monday to back the removal of MK Ayman Odeh, prompting sharp criticism from the head of the Arab-led Hadash-Ta’al faction, who accused the government of trying to silence Arab voices in Israel.
After two days of intense deliberations, the committee—including members from opposition parties Yesh Atid and National Unity—voted 14 to 2 in favor of pushing forward the impeachment. The issue now heads to the full Knesset for a vote, where 90 members would have to approve in order to formally expel Odeh.
The proceedings focused on a controversial message Odeh posted earlier this year in which he seemed to draw a parallel between Israeli captives held by Hamas and Palestinian prisoners incarcerated in Israel.
Odeh caused a political firestorm on January 19 when he wrote on X that he was “happy for the release of the hostages and prisoners” as part of a ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.
In his defense, Odeh later clarified that the Palestinians freed were primarily minors, and he argued that “most of the prisoners released that day were not charged with anything at all.”
Although none of those released were convicted murderers, several had been involved in failed attacks, such as 15-year-old Mahmoud Aliowat, who wounded two people in a shooting in Jerusalem’s City of David neighborhood at the age of 13.
Reacting to Odeh’s remarks, Likud MK Avichai Boaron recently launched a signature drive among fellow lawmakers to initiate the impeachment process, asserting that “whoever sticks a knife in the back of IDF soldiers and the State of Israel will not be a member of Knesset.”
Addressing supporters protesting against the move outside the Knesset, Odeh maintained that Boaron’s efforts were part of a broader campaign to marginalize Arab citizens.
“Under the cover of this war, they want to bring us backwards, to hurt freedom of expression that we over the course of many years struggled to expand,” he declared, as demonstrators brandished red flags adorned with communist symbols and multilingual signs backing Odeh.
According to Israel’s Basic Law: The Knesset, lawmakers can expel an MK who expresses backing for “an armed struggle” against the state. Once 70 MKs endorse such a motion, it is reviewed by the House Committee, and if approved, goes to the full plenum for a final vote.
Although the key point of contention was whether Odeh’s post amounts to support for terrorism, committee members brought up other examples to strengthen their argument, including his recent claim that “Gaza has won, and Gaza will win.”
“If it were up to him, he would shoot each one of us in the head. In his subconscious, he wants to eliminate all of us here,” said Likud MK Osher Shekalim during the hearing.
Otzma Yehudit MK Limor Son Har-Melech argued that removing Odeh was a matter of principle, not politics. “The proposal to impeach Odeh is not a political question but a moral one. There is no justification for a person who supports terrorists and who was happy about the release of terrorists to serve as a member of Knesset,” she stated, adding that there was “broad consensus on the issue.”
Although a previous attempt to remove MK Ofer Cassif of Hadash-Ta’al in February 2024 failed due to insufficient backing in the plenum, this time the measure had strong support from the opposition. Yesh Atid’s Simon Davidson and National Unity’s Pnina Tamano-Shata both voted in favor.
Tamano-Shata emphasized to the committee that “One of the grounds for dismissing an MK is incitement to racism, and I tell you, antisemitism is racism and anyone who shouts ‘Gaza will win’ during a war does not deserve to sit in the Knesset.”
She added that Odeh must “decide whether he is a Gazan or an Israeli.”
When asked if Yesh Atid would support the measure in the full plenum, party chairman and Opposition Leader Yair Lapid told reporters, “anyone who speaks like this should not be a member of Knesset.”
National Unity head Benny Gantz, meanwhile, voiced discomfort with the idea of legislators voting to expel one of their own, though he did condemn Odeh’s remarks. “We will hold a members’ debate beforehand and decide what we are doing,” he said.
Odeh responded to Davidson and Tamano-Shata’s support for the measure by accusing the opposition of working hand in hand with the coalition to erode democracy. “Some of them hate us more than they love democracy,” he said, adding, “They want to subdue the judicial system, silence critical voices, and turn Israel into a messianic dictatorship. Today it’s me – tomorrow it’s you. Anyone who dares to oppose will be next in line.”
MK Ofer Cassif voiced similar sentiments on social media, calling the hearing a “shameful and grotesque show trial, a political lynching [in which] Knesset members competed over who could shout louder, incite more, rant more, attack more, act more thuggishly, and slander more.”
He warned that “the decision to dismiss MK Odeh is another step in the rampage of fascism in Israel, which will also reach those opposition elements that joined the bloodthirsty coalition in supporting this persecution and impeachment.”
Cassif was ejected twice from the committee session, while Ra’am MK Waleed Taha was removed once and nearly thrown out a second time for speaking Arabic—prompting complaints that disruptions by Arab MKs were penalized, while similar behavior by coalition members was ignored.
Sagit Afik, the Knesset’s legal adviser, acknowledged that while public outrage over Odeh’s statement was understandable, that didn’t necessarily mean it met the legal criteria for removal. “A clear case must exist in which there is a significant mass of clear, unequivocal and convincing evidence showing that support for armed struggle is a dominant feature within the framework of the candidate’s aspirations,” she told the panel. “It is doubtful whether this statement meets the test of support for an armed struggle by a terrorist organization.”
Deputy Attorney General Avital Sompolinsky concurred, stating that Odeh’s message may be “outrageous,” but “does not meet the required threshold.”
Democrats party leader Yair Golan, referencing Odeh’s decision not to run for reelection, dismissed the entire effort as political posturing. “His impeachment is another victory for the nationalist-extremist government over a secure and democratic Israel. This morning it’s Ayman. This afternoon it’s the public broadcasting corporation. Tomorrow it’s the attorney general. The day after tomorrow it’s you. Wake up,” he tweeted.
{Matzav.com Israel}
Trump to Host Netanyahu at White House Next Monday
Flatbush Shooting Suspect Linked to Nearby Western Union Robbery, NYPD Investigates
Musk Blasts Trump’s Bill, Urges New Party as U.S. Debt Soars to $5 Trillion
International Criminal Court Hit by “Sophisticated” Cyberattack Amid Global Tensions
Iranian National’s Wife Indicted for Threatening to Shoot ICE Officers in Arizona
Canada Drops Digital Services Tax After White House Push, Boosting U.S. Tech
White House: Trump ‘Simply Emphasizing His Empathy’ for Netanyahu by Demanding Trial End
President Donald Trump believes that the legal proceedings against Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu are hampering critical negotiations involving Iran and Gaza, according to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. She explained that the court’s requirement for Netanyahu to be physically present comes at a time when he is “in the middle of negotiating a peace deal and bringing hostages out of a war torn region.”
Despite Trump’s concerns, there has been no evidence so far that Netanyahu’s courtroom obligations have interfered with hostage negotiations. In fact, the prime minister recently convened a cabinet meeting to discuss the ongoing situation, though it concluded without any concrete decisions.
Trump, however, has made his stance clear, using his Truth Social platform twice in the past week to call for the cancellation of Netanyahu’s corruption trial.
When asked to clarify the president’s position, Leavitt said Trump “was simply emphasizing his empathy that he has for Bibi Netanyahu, seeing him go through what he’s going through with his own judicial system in the State of Israel.”
She added, “Clearly, the president knows that very well. He too was a victim of a judicial system that was trying to put him in jail, but President Trump prevailed,” praising Netanyahu for his partnership with the United States in confronting Iran.
{Matzav.com}
HY”D: Karen Diamond, 82-Year-Old Victim Of Antisemitic Firebombing Attack, Passes Away From Her Injuries
YWN EXCLUSIVE: NYC Mayor Adams Blasts NYS Education Dept Over Special Ed Issues At Yeshivas
ICC Reveals It Was Targeted In ‘Sophisticated’ Cyberattack, Says Working To Limit Damage
The International Criminal Court revealed on Monday that it had recently experienced a “sophisticated” cyber intrusion and is now working to assess the damage and protect its systems from further harm.
In a brief update, the ICC confirmed that the breach, which comes just a year after another cyberattack in 2023, has been brought under control. However, the court provided no additional information regarding who may be responsible or what the attackers’ goals might have been.
“A court-wide impact analysis is being carried out, and steps are already being taken to mitigate any effects of the incident,” the court stated, noting that efforts are underway to understand the scope and minimize any disruption caused by the breach.
According to officials, the breach occurred sometime last week.
“All necessary measures have been taken to ensure the business continuity,” court spokesman Fadi El Abdallah told The Associated Press, suggesting that the institution’s operations are continuing despite the digital assault.
Interestingly, the hack coincided with a gathering of 32 NATO leaders in The Hague, held at a convention center close to the ICC’s premises. The event featured heightened cybersecurity precautions, raising questions about whether the attack was linked to the summit.
The court has not disclosed whether any internal data or sensitive material was accessed or stolen during the breach.
Despite efforts to recover from the 2023 cyberattack, the ICC is still struggling to fully restore all systems, with internal Wi-Fi service at its headquarters still not functioning as intended.
{Matzav.com}
Senators Consider Proposed Amendments To Trump’s Big Bill Of Tax Breaks And Spending Cuts
Trump Administration Sues Los Angeles Over Sanctuary Laws After Anti-ICE Riot
The Trump administration filed a lawsuit on Monday targeting the city of Los Angeles, along with its mayor and other top officials, over policies the federal government says obstruct immigration enforcement and unfairly single out federal agents.
The legal action lists Mayor Karen Bass, who is currently under intense scrutiny, and the entire Los Angeles City Council as defendants. The complaint argues that the city’s sanctuary stance hampers the ability of immigration officers to perform their federally mandated duties.
“Sanctuary City laws and policies are designed to deliberately impede federal immigration officers’ ability to carry out their responsibilities in those jurisdictions,” the lawsuit reads in part.
The lawsuit asserts that the ordinance and related directives in Los Angeles violate the law by deliberately treating federal immigration personnel in a discriminatory fashion.
“The Los Angeles Ordinance and other policies intentionally discriminate against the Federal Government by treating federal immigration authorities differently.”
In a strongly worded statement, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi condemned Los Angeles.
“Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles,” she said.
Bondi further criticized jurisdictions with similar policies, saying their actions endanger public safety.
“Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level — it ends under President Trump.”
The lawsuit comes on the heels of chaotic demonstrations earlier this month in downtown Los Angeles. Protesters targeted Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, torched vehicles, and engaged in widespread vandalism and looting of area businesses.
{Matzav.com}
Danon to UN: ‘Silence in Face of Murder is Not Impartiality, But Abandonment’
The United Nations Security Council gathered on Monday to deliberate over ongoing developments in the Middle East.
Israel’s envoy to the UN, Danny Danon, took the opportunity to sharply call out the international body for its treatment of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an aid organization that bypasses Hamas and delivers assistance directly to civilians in Gaza.
“Senior UN officials are threatening organizations operating with the GHF…and promoted false allegations against the GHF about drug distribution and other violent incidents, shamelessly promoting claims made by Hamas-controlled sources,” Danon stated, accusing top UN figures of parroting propaganda from terror-linked sources and undermining legitimate aid efforts.
Danon then pointed to a recent deadly attack against GHF workers. “Three weeks ago, Hamas gunmen murdered clearly identified GHF staff as they were returning from a day of feeding Gazan civilians. The Secretary-General said noting. OCHA said nothing. UNRWA said nothing. Silence in the face of murder is not impartiality; it is abandonment.” His words underscored what he described as a glaring and deliberate indifference from major UN branches.
He also recounted the deeply disturbing murder of Yonatan Samerano, whose remains were dragged into Gaza by an employee of UNRWA. “The United Nations paid the wages of the man who stole Yonatan’s body and dragged him into Gaza. Where are the condolences from the Secretary-General? Where is even an apology from Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini?” Danon asked, pointing to UN accountability—or the lack thereof.
He described how Yonatan’s mother, Ayelet Samerano, came to the United Nations hoping for acknowledgment and justice. “Yonatan’s mother, Ayelet Samerano, came here to this very building and looked Commissioner Lazzarini in the eyes. We demanded accountability. We reminded him that a UN badge must not be a shield for terrorists. And how was she received? With polite nods, but then, with silence. She spoke, and many looked away,” Danon told the chamber, painting a picture of bureaucratic coldness in the face of grief.
Danon concluded his remarks with an emotional indictment: “Now, she has buried her son while the UN buries its head in the sand,” condemning the UN for its moral failure to respond meaningfully to the tragedy.
{Matzav.com}
INSANE: 20% Of Jewish Voters in NYC Supported Mamdani in the Mayoral Primary
WH Touts “One Big Beautiful Bill” as Fiscally Conservative Tax Cut Triumph
Pages
