JD Vance Warns Iran Retaliation Would Be The ‘Stupidest Thing In The World’ — Says US ‘Prepared’ Despite Sleeper Cell Concerns
Vice President JD Vance on Sunday made clear that the United States is not planning to deploy troops to Iran, though he acknowledged that the administration is taking precautions against possible domestic threats from Iranian operatives.
“We’re not at war with Iran. We’re at war with Iran’s nuclear program,” Vance stated during an appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
He emphasized the administration’s reluctance to escalate the conflict: “We have no interest in a protracted conflict. We have no interest in boots on the ground,” Vance said. “We didn’t blow up diplomacy.”
Vance defended the strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, asserting they were only launched after diplomatic efforts were clearly being undermined by Tehran. “We only took this action when it was clear, as the president said, that the Iranians were tapping us along,” the vice president remarked.
He then took aim at Tehran’s military capabilities, mocking their effectiveness and encouraging a shift in strategy. “The Iranians are clearly not very good at war. Perhaps they should follow President Trump’s lead and give peace a chance if they’re serious about it. I guarantee you, the president of the United States is,” he said.
According to Vance, Iran’s influence through regional proxy groups has already been weakened, and their atomic program has been decimated—though he acknowledged that full assessments are ongoing.
In the wake of the strikes announced Saturday night, President Trump issued a stern warning to Tehran, saying any retaliatory act “will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed” during the coordinated attacks on the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan facilities.
Echoing the president, Vance cautioned Iran against any response, calling such a move reckless. “It would be the stupidest thing in the world if they” pursue revenge, he said, while noting that the U.S. has taken steps to prepare for any backlash.
“We’re, of course, doing everything that we can to keep our people safe. I think that we’re prepared in the event that the Iranians do retaliate,” Vance explained. He also warned about dormant terrorist threats on American soil. “Unfortunately, we know that a lot of people who we don’t have full accounting of were let in over the last four years under the Biden administration,” he said.
U.S. officials are also considering the risk that Iran could attack American troops or military assets in the Middle East or try to disrupt global oil shipments by obstructing the Strait of Hormuz.
Vance said such a maneuver would have catastrophic consequences for Iran itself. “It would be suicidal” for Tehran to take that route, he said, particularly given its already fragile economic state.
Nonetheless, he reiterated what the administration views as the most critical threshold. “Our biggest red line is the Iranian nuclear weapons,” he said.
Although Vance has traditionally aligned with non-interventionist policies—expressing reservations about sustained U.S. support for Ukraine and, according to a March leak, harboring private concerns about airstrikes in Yemen—he stood firmly behind the current military action.
He insisted that President Trump’s recent decision was guided by strategic judgment and a commitment to preventing Iran’s ruling regime from developing nuclear arms. “The president has actually been one of the fiercest critics of 25 years of failed foreign policy in the Middle East, which is why he did what he did: a very precise, a very surgical strike tailored to an American national interest,” Vance said.
He went on to affirm his belief that this won’t spiral into a broader war. “I don’t fear that this is going to become a protracted conflict because I think that we have a president who knows what’s in America’s interest,” he stated.
Vance compared the administration’s targeted strike to previous, more drawn-out military engagements in the region. “I certainly empathize with Americans who are exhausted after 25 years of foreign entanglements in the Middle East,” he noted. “I understand the concern. But the difference is that back then we had a dumb president.”
Democrats swiftly called for President Trump’s impeachment after news of the attacks emerged, claiming he had acted beyond his constitutional powers. Even a few Republicans, including Representative Thomas Massie of Kentucky, criticized the strikes as illegal.
But Vance dismissed the backlash, maintaining that the president acted within legal limits. “The president has clear authority to act to prevent proliferation of weapons of mass destruction,” he said.
Earlier this year, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard told Congress that U.S. agencies did not assess Iran to be building a nuclear weapon. She later criticized how her testimony had been portrayed by the media.
Nevertheless, Vance said the president had compelling justification for the strikes. “They were way too close to a nuclear weapon for the comfort of the president of the United States, which is why he took this action,” he said. “We had a narrow window of opportunity.”
He added that time was of the essence. “We might not have been able to carry out this attack six months down the road,” Vance said. “It would have been irresponsible, I think, for the president not to take the action that he did.”
As for what comes next, Vance left that in Iran’s hands. “What happens next is up to the Iranians,” he concluded.
{Matzav.com}