Senate Could Take Test Vote On New Spending Bill As Early As Sunday Afternoon
A Senate showdown could come as soon as tomorrow, with a procedural vote expected on a reworked Republican measure aimed at reopening the government and keeping key agencies funded for the remainder of the fiscal year.
The finalized text, anticipated tonight or early tomorrow, is expected to keep the government running through late January while securing full-year appropriations for the Departments of Agriculture and Veterans Affairs, military construction projects, and Congress through September 30, 2026.
Sources say that once the bill text drops, momentum will build quickly. The proposal is described as a straightforward spending package, notably excluding any renewal of Obamacare subsidies.
To move forward, the test vote will require 60 senators to vote yes—meaning at least some Democratic support is essential. Fox reports that several Senate Democrats and independents aligned with them are being closely watched to see if they will help Republicans overcome a filibuster. Among them: Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois, Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, Jon Ossoff of Georgia, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Gary Peters of Michigan, Angus King of Maine, and Patty Murray of Washington. Murray, a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, reportedly secured favorable provisions in the delicate bipartisan deal.
But the coalition is tenuous. Any wavering could collapse the effort before it reaches the floor. Should the filibuster be broken, however, the path toward reopening the government becomes significantly easier, and a final vote could happen as early as Sunday night—provided senators can strike a time agreement.
Once debate formally begins, Senate rules allow for extensive discussion. Progressive Democrats, frustrated that no healthcare-related provisions were included and feeling sidelined by their leadership, may try to prolong the process. That could push a final vote to Tuesday or later. Still, with SNAP benefits frozen during the shutdown, some Democrats may ultimately agree to speed up proceedings to restore aid.
Across the Capitol, the House has been placed on 48-hour notice to reconvene. It could return midweek, though leadership might summon members back earlier if the Senate acts quickly. The bill’s fate in the House remains uncertain, though most Republicans are expected to back it.
Moderate Democrats may also be key to its passage. Representatives Tom Suozzi of New York, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of Washington, and Jared Golden of Maine—who previously supported a GOP spending bill in September—are seen as potential yes votes if Republican support slips. Golden, who has since announced his retirement, is again being watched closely.
Another potential complication involves Rep.-elect Adelita Grijalva of Arizona. Lawmakers are questioning whether she will be sworn in before or after the House vote, with Democrats likely to protest if Speaker Johnson delays the oath.
Once seated, Grijalva would bring the House count to 433 members, leaving two vacancies. That would give Republicans a narrow 219-214 edge—meaning they can afford to lose only two votes without needing Democratic help.
Behind the scenes, Democrats are bracing for internal conflict. Should some of their members vote with Republicans to break the filibuster, tensions are expected to flare between progressives demanding Obamacare subsidies and moderates eager to end the shutdown.
In the end, the biggest divide may not be between parties, but within the Democratic ranks themselves—particularly between the House and Senate wings. And as one insider put it, the ultimate irony may be that a group of Senate Democrats ends up “throwing their colleagues under the bus” to reopen the government, walking away from the standoff empty-handed on healthcare funding despite the political risk.
{Matzav.com}
