TWISTED MINDS: Israel Is Committing Genocide In Gaza, Global Scholars Association Says
A global network of genocide experts has officially adopted a resolution asserting that Israel’s military campaign in Gaza fits the legal definition of genocide, the organization’s president confirmed on Monday.
Among the 500 members of the International Association of Genocide Scholars, 86% supported the resolution, which declares that “Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).”
The resolution comes as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) continues hearing a case brought by South Africa, which accuses Israel of attempting to destroy the Palestinian population in Gaza. Filed in December 2023, the lawsuit alleges systematic violations under the Genocide Convention.
Momentum increased in May when South Africa submitted an extensive legal brief, prompting several nations to publicly back the proceedings and call for closer scrutiny of Israel’s military conduct.
In July 2024, the ICJ granted Israel additional time to file its counter-arguments. While analysts said the delay provided a short-term reprieve, they emphasized that it did not diminish the growing international and legal pressure on Israel.
By August, a group of countries, including Ireland, urged the court to adopt a broader interpretation of what constitutes genocide, seeking to expand the standards under which nations could face accountability.
Throughout 2024 and into 2025, Israeli officials have continued to criticize international legal bodies, insisting that both the ICJ and the International Criminal Court are being used for political purposes intended to delegitimize Israel’s right to defend itself.
Inside Israel, opinions remain divided on labeling the Gaza campaign as genocide.
Author David Grossman, whose son died while serving in Lebanon, stated in August that Israel’s conduct in Gaza amounts to genocide, making him one of the most prominent Israelis to embrace the term.
Others have strongly pushed back. In July, international law expert Nitsana Darshan-Leitner acknowledged the significant civilian casualties but maintained that the legal threshold for genocide had not been met. She cautioned that misusing the term could erode its seriousness and impact.
Military scholar John Spencer reviewed Israel’s targeting policies and concluded there was no evidence of genocidal intent. He characterized the accusations as politically driven rather than grounded in law.
Commentator Sherwin Pomerantz argued that while Israel’s operations have caused severe destruction, they lack the deliberate intent required to constitute genocide under international statutes.
The debate over the terminology surfaced earlier in 2024 as well. In June, political analyst Alon Ben-Meir warned that framing Israel’s actions as genocide risks fueling antisemitism by conflating criticism of Israeli policies with hostility toward Jewish communities worldwide.
Since its establishment in 1994, the International Association of Genocide Scholars has passed nine resolutions acknowledging past or ongoing instances of genocide.
Reaction to the group’s latest resolution has been sharply polarized. Supporters say it highlights the catastrophic human toll of the conflict and validates longstanding concerns about Israel’s conduct. Critics counter that it represents a misinterpretation of the world’s most serious legal accusation, undermining its credibility.
{Matzav.com Israel}