Washington Post Editorial Says Mamdani ‘Drops The Mask’ After Election Win, Offers ‘Seething’ Victory Speech
The Washington Post editorial board issued a blistering critique of New York City Mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani, declaring that “a new era of class warfare has begun” following his landslide victory last week. The paper accused him of revealing his “true colors” in a bitter and divisive victory speech that sharply contrasted with the cheerful tone of his campaign.
In an editorial published Saturday titled “Zohran Mamdani Drops the Mask,” the board charged that Mamdani “abandoned his cool disposition” during what it called a “seething” 23-minute address. According to the piece, the speech unveiled a worldview rooted not in unity or growth, but in resentment and ideological combat.
“Across 23 angry minutes laced with identity politics and seething with resentment, Mamdani abandoned his cool disposition and made clear that his view of politics isn’t about unity. It isn’t about letting people build better lives for themselves. It is about identifying class enemies — from landlords who take advantage of tenants to ‘the bosses’ who exploit workers — and then crushing them,” the editorial board wrote. “His goal is not to increase wealth but to dole it out to favored groups. The word ‘growth’ didn’t appear in the speech, but President Donald Trump garnered eight mentions.”
The Post accused Mamdani of running a misleadingly positive campaign that masked what it called a “long history of divisive and demagogic statements.” For casual observers, the board said, it would have been easy to believe that Mamdani’s goal was simply to make the city more affordable and unified. “That interpretation became much harder,” it added, after Tuesday’s fiery speech.
Fox News Digital contacted representatives of Mamdani for comment but received no immediate response.
The editorial took particular issue with Mamdani’s vision of an all-powerful government as the solution to every societal problem. It cited one of his remarks as proof: “We will prove that there is no problem too large for government to solve, and no concern too small for it to care about.” The Post responded sharply: “The crowd cheered, of course, but a thinking person might wonder whether it’s good for the institution that has a monopoly on violence to insist that nothing is beyond its purview.”
The board also targeted Mamdani’s plan to freeze rents on two million housing units, warning that the proposal would “inevitably lead to less investment, driving up costs in the long run.”
Since his victory, the Post said, the mayor-elect has become fond of using the word “mandate.” “He won decisively and now wants to pursue his agenda, from the rent freeze to ‘free’ child care and buses. Yet as mayor of New York, his control over taxes and transportation is limited. He needs approval from the state to raise taxes,” the paper noted. It added that his transition team is a mix of experienced political hands and “diehard ideologues such as Lina Khan, the former Federal Trade Commission chair.”
Drawing a historical comparison, the Post likened Mamdani’s electoral triumph to that of John Lindsay, the last candidate to surpass one million votes in a New York City mayoral race. But it warned that the same state-imposed financial restrictions that followed Lindsay’s troubled tenure would likely constrain Mamdani’s ambitions.
“One reason [Mamdani] will be so constrained is that Lindsay’s mayoralty was such a disaster for the city’s finances that the state imposed these financial controls to make sure it wouldn’t happen again,” the editorial explained.
Turning to public safety and education, the board questioned how Mamdani would apply his “class struggle” approach to areas where his power is greatest. “[Mamdani] says he wants to keep Police Commissioner Jessica S. Tisch, who is respected by officers and competent at fighting crime. Will he give her deference? Will he order that prostitution laws stop being enforced, as he has suggested? Will subway stations become dangerous social experiments where vagrants are welcomed in to receive services?”
On education, the Post charged that Mamdani “has done nothing to suggest he’ll take the side of children over union bosses when their interests conflict,” pointing to his stated desire to phase out the city’s gifted education programs.
In closing, the editorial warned that New Yorkers don’t need advanced degrees to understand what Mamdani’s leadership might bring — just a memory of the city’s past. “Exit polls showed that the New Yorkers most skeptical of these utopian promises are those who were born in the city and don’t have college degrees. Mamdani fared best among newcomers and people with advanced degrees. Apparently, living in New York for decades — and witnessing what does and doesn’t work when it comes to running a city — offers more wisdom than grad school,” the piece concluded.
{Matzav.com}
