Feed aggregator

Thousands of US Marines are expected to deploy to the Middle East this week as tensions with Iran continue, with their arrival aligning with President Donald Trump’s deadline for Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, according to a report published Monday.

The Wall Street Journal, citing two US officials, reported that the USS Tripoli, an amphibious assault ship based in Japan, along with the amphibious transport dock USS New Orleans, are set to enter the US Central Command area on Friday, carrying approximately 2,200 Marines.

According to the officials, the forces will require several more days after entering the region before reaching the Strait of Hormuz.

The deployment comes after Trump issued a warning to Iran over the weekend, demanding that it reopen the strategic waterway within 48 hours or risk military action targeting its power infrastructure.

Although that deadline was initially set to expire Monday, Trump later announced that he would extend it in order to provide additional time for diplomatic engagement between Washington and Tehran.

Trump also said that the United States has begun outreach to “very solid” individuals within Iran as part of efforts to facilitate talks.

Reports that followed suggested that Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, might be acting as Tehran’s representative in those discussions. However, Ghalibaf publicly denied that any such negotiations were taking place.

“Our people demand the complete and humiliating punishment of the aggressors. All officials stand firmly behind their Leader and people until this goal is achieved,” Ghalibaf wrote on social media.

According to the speaker, “No negotiations with America have taken place. Fake news is intended to manipulate financial and oil markets and to escape the quagmire in which America and Israel are trapped.”

{Matzav.com}

The Trump administration is reportedly weighing the possibility of engaging Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, as a potential interlocutor in negotiations and even considering him as a possible future leader, signaling a shift toward diplomacy as the conflict continues.

According to a Politico report published Monday, officials in Washington are exploring options beyond military pressure and are looking at figures within Iran who might be willing to enter talks aimed at ending hostilities.

Ghalibaf, 64, who has previously issued threats of retaliation against the United States and its allies, is nonetheless being viewed by some White House officials as a pragmatic figure who could play a role in future negotiations or leadership, according to two administration officials cited in the report.

Those officials stressed that the administration has not settled on any one individual and is reviewing a range of potential figures to determine who might be open to reaching an agreement. They spoke anonymously due to the sensitivity of the internal discussions.

“He’s a hot option,” one official said, adding that no decisions have been made. “He’s one of the highest…But we got to test them, and we can’t rush into it.”

Responding to the report, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, “These are sensitive diplomatic discussions and the United States will not negotiate through the news media.”

The report surfaced shortly after President Donald Trump announced a temporary halt to “any and all military strikes against Iranian power plants and energy infrastructure” for five days, in order to give diplomacy a chance. He also indicated that Washington is reaching out to “very solid” individuals within Iran.

Ghalibaf later rejected claims that he was involved in negotiations with the United States, issuing a firm denial on social media.

“Our people demand the complete and humiliating punishment of the aggressors. All officials stand firmly behind their Leader and people until this goal is achieved,” Ghalibaf wrote.

According to the speaker, “No negotiations with America have taken place. Fake news is intended to manipulate financial and oil markets and to escape the quagmire in which America and Israel are trapped.”

Despite those denials, administration officials cited in the report suggested that his remarks may have been intended for domestic audiences rather than reflecting the full picture.

“We’re in the testing phase of really trying to figure out who can rise, who wants to rise, who tries to rise,” one official said. “And then as people rise, we’ll do a quick test, and if they’re radical, we’ll take them out.”

A senior White House official added that Trump is seeking to reach a peace agreement within days, with progress tied to developments involving the Strait of Hormuz and a potential ceasefire.

“POTUS, like anyone, would rather have peace than war,” the official said.

{Matzav.com}

WATCH:

LISTEN:

​​For more info, email bitachon4life@gmail.com.

LISTEN:

New data released Monday reveals that the overwhelming majority of Iran’s attacks over the past three weeks have targeted Arab Gulf states rather than Israel, highlighting a significant strategic shift in Tehran’s campaign.

According to the report, which analyzes the period between February 28 and March 23, 2026, approximately 87% of Iran’s missile and drone launches were aimed at members of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), while only 13% were directed at Israel. The findings are based on official statements from the IDF, Gulf defense ministries, and additional open-source intelligence.

Out of a total of 6,330 launches during the reporting period, the United Arab Emirates emerged as the primary target, absorbing nearly half of all attacks. The data shows that 3,056 strikes—48.3% of the total—were directed at the UAE.

Kuwait ranked second, with 1,061 attacks accounting for 16.8% of the total. Israel, despite being a central focus of Iranian rhetoric, was targeted 822 times, representing just 13% of the overall volume of attacks.

Additional figures show that Saudi Arabia sustained 648 attacks (10.2%), Bahrain was hit 429 times (6.8%), Qatar faced 289 strikes (4.6%), and Oman recorded 25 attacks (0.4%).

The report suggests that Iran’s strategy has centered on imposing economic and strategic costs on Gulf states, particularly by targeting energy and security infrastructure. Recent reported strikes on facilities in Ras Laffan, Qatar, and gas fields in Abu Dhabi are cited as examples of this approach.

Israeli military officials emphasized that the stark disparity—87% directed at Arab states versus 13% at Israel—indicates that the current conflict is largely about regional dominance and control over global energy resources. According to this assessment, Israel has played a secondary role in Iran’s targeting priorities.

Despite criticism of Gulf air defense systems, the data indicates that Iran is focusing the bulk of its efforts on destabilizing neighboring Arab states economically and politically, while leveraging the conflict with Israel as a broader strategic cover for advancing its regional ambitions.

{Matzav.com}

A legal dispute over a luxury vehicle has highlighted the blurred boundaries between business assets and personal property, after an Israeli court ruled that a husband must return a car he had taken from his wife during a marital conflict.

The case involves a couple married since 1991 who built a large family over the years. During the marriage, the husband operated a successful business through which various assets were acquired for family use, including a vehicle worth hundreds of thousands of shekels that was used exclusively by the wife.

As tensions between the couple escalated, the husband arranged for the vehicle to be taken from the wife while it was undergoing routine maintenance. He argued that because she had been dismissed from her position in the company, she no longer had the right to use what he claimed was a company-owned asset.

However, the Haifa District Court rejected the husband’s arguments on appeal, upholding the earlier ruling and emphasizing that the distinction between the couple’s business dealings and their personal lives had been “blurred” throughout the years.

The court determined that the vehicle had effectively been given to the wife as a personal gift for her exclusive use, rather than as part of any formal employment arrangement.

Judges also found that, despite the issuance of salary slips, the wife did not actually perform work for the company, and that the payments she received were part of the couple’s internal financial arrangements rather than evidence of a genuine employer-employee relationship.

The ruling further stressed the need for judicial intervention to prevent unilateral actions during ongoing disputes, warning against what it described as “coercive conduct” intended to alter the status quo while legal rights are still being determined.

In its final decision, the court ruled that jurisdiction over the matter lies with the family court, as the dispute is fundamentally personal rather than a standard labor-related case.

The husband’s appeal was denied, and he was ordered to immediately return the vehicle to his wife. In addition, he was required to pay 7,500 shekels in legal costs.

Bottom line: Shalom bayis is a good idea!