Matzav

Appeals Court Throws Out Plea Deal for Alleged Mastermind of Sept. 11 Attacks

A sharply divided federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., ruled Friday to invalidate a plea agreement that would have permitted Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind behind the September 11 attacks, to avoid the death penalty by admitting guilt.

This ruling overturns a proposed resolution to the long-delayed military proceedings that have stretched over twenty years, burdened by legal setbacks and procedural difficulties. With the court’s decision, the complex and drawn-out process to prosecute the architect of one of the most horrific terror attacks on American soil remains far from over.

The plea arrangement—hammered out over a two-year period and formally endorsed by military prosecutors and the Pentagon’s lead Guantanamo official in 2023—would have sentenced Mohammed and two fellow defendants to life imprisonment without any chance of parole.

Mohammed faces charges for orchestrating the plan that led to hijacked commercial jets being flown into the Twin Towers and the Pentagon, with a fourth crashing into a Pennsylvania field after passengers intervened.

As part of the proposed deal, the accused were expected to provide answers to unresolved questions that continue to haunt the victims’ families even decades after the attacks.

However, then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin rejected the agreement, asserting that the gravity of the September 11 attacks required that any decision about whether the death penalty should be pursued fall under the direct responsibility of the defense secretary himself.

Defense lawyers maintained that the agreement had already gone into effect and that Austin, serving in the Biden administration at the time, acted beyond the appropriate window to rescind it. Their position was supported by both the military judge overseeing the case at Guantanamo and a military appeals body.

Despite that, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, determined that Austin was within his legal rights and criticized the military judge for an erroneous interpretation of the law.

The court had earlier issued a temporary freeze on the agreement while it reviewed the appeal—a case initiated by the Biden administration and later continued under President Donald Trump.

“Having properly assumed the convening authority, the Secretary determined that the ‘families and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commission trials carried out.’ The Secretary acted within the bounds of his legal authority, and we decline to second-guess his judgment,” Judges Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao wrote.

Judge Millett was nominated by Barack Obama, while Judge Rao received her appointment from Trump.

Dissenting from the majority, Judge Robert Wilkins—also appointed by Obama—argued, “The government has not come within a country mile of proving clearly and indisputably that the Military Judge erred.”

{Matzav.com}

Ben-Gvir Says Gaza Ceasefire Negotiations Encourage Hamas To Continue Kidnapping Israelis

National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir voiced sharp disapproval Thursday over the ongoing efforts to broker a ceasefire agreement in Gaza and secure the release of hostages held by Hamas.

“As the negotiations for reckless deals intensify, so does the motivation of Hamas terrorists to carry out more kidnappings,” he said. “Last night, it cost us the life of an IDF soldier,” he added.

Ben-Gvir was referring to the death of Staff-Sergeant-Major Abraham Azulay, who was killed in action Wednesday in Khan Yunis. The incident occurred during a mission when Hamas terrorists emerged from a tunnel and attempted to capture him.

Calling for an end to the talks, Ben-Gvir urged Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu—currently in Washington for meetings with President Donald Trump concerning the proposed ceasefire—to abandon negotiations altogether.

“Enough of negotiating with a murderous terror organization and pursuing a deal that will strengthen and sustain it,” he stated.

“The lives of our soldiers and the residents of the South are more important than any normalization and economic agreements,” he added.

“Give the order to crush Hamas to the end. We do not have unnecessary soldiers to lose in reckless deals,” he concluded.

Ben-Gvir has persistently pushed for halting the negotiations, reiterating his stance this past Saturday with a post on X/Twitter, where he urged Netanyahu to scrap the proposed agreement, which is backed by the United States.

Withdraw from the “surrender framework,” and “return to a framework of decisive victory,” Ben-Gvir wrote.

“The only path to decisive victory and the secure return of our hostages is the full conquest of the Gaza Strip, a complete halt to so-called ‘humanitarian aid,’ and the encouragement of emigration,” he added.

While an agreement over hostages and a ceasefire is reportedly nearing finalization, a central sticking point remains unresolved: the positioning of IDF forces inside Gaza during the expected 60-day pause in fighting. A source with knowledge of the matter told The Jerusalem Post on Wednesday that negotiations between Hamas and Israel, currently taking place in Doha, Qatar, are still underway.

According to that source, Israel’s team submitted an updated offer featuring detailed military deployment maps covering the entire ceasefire period. The new plan focuses primarily on areas located south of the Morag Corridor.

Hamas, however, is insisting on a total pullout of IDF troops during the 60-day timeframe, similar to what occurred during the truce in January. But Israeli officials are holding firm on maintaining control in certain zones, especially around the Morag Corridor. Two government sources explained that this revised map proposal reflects a significant Israeli concession compared to earlier terms—hence its introduction into the talks.

{Matzav.com Israel}

Report: Netanyahu Briefed Gafni On Iran Strike In Advance

A bombshell report published Friday by The New York Times alleges that Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu disclosed top-secret details of a planned military strike on Iran to MK Moshe Gafni three days before it occurred. Despite Gafni not holding the appropriate security clearance, Netanyahu is said to have summoned him to the Kirya military headquarters on June 9 and briefed him on the classified operation.

This revelation took place amid a tense standoff between Netanyahu and the chareidi political factions, who were threatening to bring down the ruling coalition over proposed legislation on the military draft of yeshiva students. The timing and nature of the disclosure raise serious questions about the use of sensitive intelligence as a political bargaining chip.

The article further claims that half a year after the October 7 attacks, Netanyahu was open to ending the war with Hamas through negotiation. It states that in April 2024, he sent a representative to engage with Egyptian mediators, signaling a willingness to reach a compromise.

During one cabinet session, Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich confronted Netanyahu over whispers of an imminent ceasefire deal. “I want you to know that if you advance a capitulation agreement in Gaza, you no longer have a government. The government is finished,” Smotrich told the prime minister. Netanyahu reportedly assured him, “No, no, that’s not going to happen.”

The investigation also provides a detailed account of the chaotic early moments of October 7. At 6:29 a.m., Netanyahu received a WhatsApp message from a high-ranking IDF official alerting him that Hamas had launched a rocket assault. Moments later, in a secure phone call that was recorded, Netanyahu gave a direct order to eliminate Hamas’s leadership. “Can we take down their leadership?” he asked. Upon hearing that the IDF had hit 1,000 targets in Gaza, Netanyahu was unimpressed. “A thousand? I want five thousand,” he replied.

{Matzav.com}

Halachic Leniencies For Soldiers During The Three Weeks

Against the backdrop of ongoing, complex fighting and the onset of the traditional period of mourning known as the Three Weeks, the IDF’s Military Rabbinate has issued a series of special halachic rulings tailored for soldiers during this time.

Among the rulings is a permit to listen to music in order to maintain alertness. Combat soldiers are also permitted to eat meat during the Nine Days if it is necessary to preserve operational readiness.

The Military Rabbinate acknowledged the challenging circumstances faced by soldiers throughout the war, noting the toll on their mental resilience. The rulings include provisions allowing soldiers experiencing emotional distress or psychological difficulty due to combat – particularly those wounded – to listen to music during the Nine Days if it aids in their recovery and return to full functioning. The allowance, however, is contingent on avoiding public listening or attendance at musical performances.

The booklet outlines various practical scenarios in which soldiers may eat or drink during training or in preparation for operational missions. It also includes schedules, summary charts of the halachic rulings, and contact information for the Military Rabbinate’s open hotline.

These rulings reflect the halachic approach consistently maintained by the Military Rabbinate throughout the months of war, emphasizing on-the-ground needs and basing decisions on a precise understanding of the operational reality and the morale of both commanders and troops.

{Matzav.com Israel}

John Fetterman Rips NYC Mayoral Nominee Zohran Mamdani: ‘Not Even A Democrat’

Senator John Fetterman (D-Pa.) delivered a sharp rebuke against Zohran Mamdani, the leading candidate in New York City’s mayoral race, dismissing him as someone who doesn’t even belong to the Democratic Party and whose views he strongly opposes.

“Everything that I’ve read on him, I don’t really agree with virtually any of it, politically,” Fetterman told Fox News in a candid assessment of the Queens assemblyman’s platform.

“That’s just where I’m at as a Democrat. He’s not even a Democrat, honestly,” Fetterman added, making clear he sees a fundamental divide between Mamdani and the Democratic Party.

The Pennsylvania senator also criticized Mamdani’s primary victory over Andrew Cuomo, calling it a political win for Republicans. “Christmas in July for the GOP,” he said of the upset.

“[It] provided an opportunity for the GOP to brand our party,” Fetterman said, warning that Mamdani’s far-left agenda could damage Democrats’ national image.

Throughout his campaign, Mamdani has backed progressive ideas such as free city bus service, tuition-free CUNY education, a citywide rent freeze, and government-funded childcare and grocery stores.

But Fetterman downplayed the broader significance of Mamdani’s victory, suggesting it has no bearing on the political realities of key swing states. “It’s definitely not Pennsylvania. It’s not Wisconsin. It’s not Nevada. If you look at any of the battleground states, New York City has no actual relevance to the kinds of states and the kind of races which determine that in 2028,” he argued.

“Is it going to be useful for attack campaigns? Absolutely,” he continued. “He’s a gift to the Republicans in that way, but there’s no lessons to be learned.”

“There’s no special kind of insight. For New York City, politically, that’s a circus mirror of the reality of politics and the politics of our country,” Fetterman concluded, painting Mamdani’s campaign as unrepresentative of the broader electorate.

The upcoming general election could feature a chaotic lineup, with Mamdani potentially facing independent challenger Jim Walden, current Mayor Eric Adams—who’s also running as an independent—and former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who’s looking to reclaim political ground.

Meanwhile, Republican Curtis Sliwa, co-founder of the Guardian Angels, is positioned as the GOP’s candidate for the city’s top office.

{Matzav.com}

Trump Says He’ll Make ‘Major Statement’ on Russia on Monday

President Donald Trump announced during an interview with NBC News that he intends to deliver a “major statement” concerning Russia this coming Monday, though he offered no additional information on the nature of the announcement.

Over the past several days, Trump has voiced growing displeasure with Russian President Vladimir Putin, particularly over the continued conflict in Ukraine and what Trump perceives as Putin’s reluctance to earnestly engage in negotiations for peace.

“I think I’ll have a major statement to make on Russia on Monday,” Trump said in his comments to NBC News, stopping short of providing any further clarification.

Meanwhile, lawmakers in Washington, D.C., are actively working on new proposals for sanctions targeting Putin’s regime, as the diplomatic efforts to end the war continue to stall.

{Matzav.com}

Poll: Majority Support Deporting Illegal Migrants to Their Country of Origin

A recent nationwide poll conducted by Cygnal in early July reveals that most voters heading into the general election are in favor of removing illegal immigrants and sending them back to their native countries.

Participants were asked, “Do you support or oppose deporting those illegally in the United States back to their country of origin?” Of all respondents, 61.3 percent said they back such a policy. Nearly 41 percent said they “strongly” support it. On the other side, 34.7 percent expressed opposition, including almost 17 percent who said they “strongly” oppose the idea.

The results displayed deep partisan divides. Among Republicans, a resounding 94 percent were in favor of deportation, with just four percent against it. Conversely, a majority of Democrats—68 percent—opposed deporting illegal immigrants, while only 26 percent supported the measure.

Independent voters leaned more in favor than against, with 59 percent supporting deportations and 37 percent standing against them.

One noteworthy finding was that among Hispanic respondents, half supported deporting illegal immigrants with criminal backgrounds, while 48 percent were opposed.

Overall, the numbers marked a slight shift from May, with support for deportation dipping by two percentage points.

The survey also gauged public sentiment on the use of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. A plurality, 49.5 percent, expressed support for ICE operations, while 47.5 percent opposed them. Another three percent said they were unsure. Republican support was again overwhelming—89 percent approved of ICE raids—while 86 percent of Democrats opposed them.

Among independents, more opposed ICE raids than supported them: 52 percent disapproved, compared to 42 percent who voiced support.

The poll, conducted July 1–2, surveyed 1,500 likely voters in the general election and carries a margin of error of plus or minus 2.51 percent.

These findings come at a time when federal authorities are ramping up deportation efforts, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) emphasizing that most of those detained have criminal histories or pending criminal cases.

In a statement tied to the bust of a child exploitation ring run by illegal immigrants in Minneapolis, DHS stated, “70% of ICE arrests are of criminal illegal aliens with convictions or pending charges.”

The agency further clarified that many individuals who are classified as “non-criminals” may in fact pose serious threats. “Additionally, many illegal aliens categorized as ‘non-criminals’ are actually terrorists, human rights abusers, gang members and more—they just don’t have a rap sheet in the U.S.,” DHS explained, adding, “This deceptive ‘non-criminal’ categorization is devoid of reality and misleads the American public.”

{Matzav.com}

Matzav Inbox: Stop Obsessing Over How We Look

Dear Hanhala,

You can take away our UGGs and sneakers, change the logo, or even rename the school—but the essence of this place remains. When you focus only on the external, you’re repeating the same mistakes so many other schools have made. You’re trying to mold us all into a picture-perfect Bais Yisroel, but it’s suffocating. When will you stop obsessing over how we look and start paying attention to what we’re going through inside? Because the truth is, we’re all struggling—whether you see it or not.

You’ve created rigid rules around phones and technology. The minute someone is caught breaking them, she’s punished—sometimes even expelled. “She broke a rule, she gets a consequence,” right? But what if you paused and asked why she broke that rule? What if you tried seeing it from her perspective? Our lives aren’t confined to the walls of your school. We live in a world saturated with technology—our siblings, cousins, friends, and neighbors all have it. It’s in our homes, yet you expect us to function without even a flip phone? Let’s be honest: many of your students have iPhones, smartwatches, and access to things that would devastate you—things that would break your heart—and you’re worried about sneakers? Please, get your priorities straight.

Why is it that being honest about our struggles automatically brands us as “off the derech” or “at-risk”? Struggles don’t always come in the form of tznius. Even the girl you proudly call your valedictorian, the one you think has it all together—she’s hurting too. But you’re so focused on maintaining an image that you’re ignoring our neshamos. We want to be good. We want connection. But we need space to be honest with you—without the fear that honesty will get us thrown out for not fitting into your narrow definition of what a “good girl” looks like.

You can’t keep saying, “This never would’ve flown in my generation,” because we didn’t grow up in your generation. We were born into a different world—one filled with challenges and influences you might not understand, but that are very real to us. Before you judge, ask: “How is she feeling? Why is she acting this way?” If a girl wears crew socks under her skirt, is she suddenly a bad person? If that’s what you believe, what hope is left for any of us?

Help us understand. Explain with compassion why certain things are considered wrong. Show us how to navigate this world with strength. Don’t just ban things or pretend they don’t exist. Technology, challenges, and pain are part of our reality, whether you acknowledge them or not. And if we don’t start being honest—if we don’t create a safe space for truth—I fear for what the future will look like. The world feels scary, and many of us are carrying so much inside. To survive, we reach for distractions—some of them harmful. Isn’t the school system supposed to help us grow into our best selves? But how can we, if we can’t even show you our true selves?

If you opened the door to real conversations about the hard stuff, girls would start to trust you. They’d come to you with their pain. You could change lives. I know this isn’t easy to hear, but it has to be said—because too many girls are slipping through the cracks. You’re shaping the next generation: our future teachers, principals, friends, shadchanim, bosses, and mothers. If we don’t start showing the world that struggling is normal, that it’s okay to talk about it and ask for help, then we’re just pretending. We’re building on a lie.

Your system teaches us that externals matter most. In class, the girl who takes notes and raises her hand is praised as “an amazing student.” But the one sitting quietly, listening intently, searching for meaning—she’s labeled as someone who doesn’t fit in. You don’t see a neshamah yearning for more; you just see someone who isn’t meeting your expectations.

Please, see us for who we are. We’re trying. We’re hurting. And we’re begging you to care.

Sincerely,
A Teenager

To submit a letter to appear on Matzav.com, email MatzavInbox@gmail.com

DON’T MISS OUT! Join the Matzav Status by CLICKING HERE. Join the Matzav WhatsApp Groups by CLICKING HERE.

The opinions expressed in letters on Matzav.com do not necessarily reflect the stance of the Matzav Media Network.

{Matzav.com}

Cory Booker: I Don’t Care If Trump Throws Me in Jail, I Won’t Stop Fighting

Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) appeared on MSNBC’s “The Briefing” Thursday, declaring that not even the threat of jail from President Donald Trump would deter him from continuing his efforts to speak out and fight back.

During the segment, host Jen Psaki brought up recent attacks from Trump, noting that both Booker and others in public office had been targeted. She asked Booker what message he had for whistleblowers and those with critical stories to share during such a tense political climate. “Trump attacked you today, I believe, of being of Trump and people from the administration going after you. You’re in elected office. You accept that I know. What do you say to people? What is your message to whistleblowers or people whose stories are so important to tell about why they should do it now, and what impact it could have.”

Booker responded with a firm call to action. “Stand up and fight.”

He continued, emphasizing his own resolve in the face of personal attacks and threats. “I’m going to continue to fight. I don’t care if this president calls me out every day, mean tweets me, threatens me. We know I’ve had open conversations with senators I never thought I would have because we saw what they’ve done with a congressperson. My Congresswoman LaMonica McIver arresting her, my mayor they’ve arrested, they’re picking off, it seems, people that live in Newark that are in elected positions. But I don’t care throw me in jail. Do what you have to do. I’m going to continue to stand up for what’s right.”

In his closing remarks, Booker expressed hope that his stance would motivate others to act with courage and conviction. “I’m hoping that when one person stands up and calls this out, it ignites the courage of another person and another person and another person. We have to at a time that our fundamental rights and freedoms, that the very democracy that we that we know is precious, is under attack by this president. We’ve got to have more people willing to stand up and fight and take him on.”

{Matzav.com}

“Are Chareidi Girls Not Human?”: Thousands of Seminary Students Decry Discrimination Over Bagrut Exemptions

Thousands of Chareidi seminary students across Israel are voicing outrage over what they say is blatant discrimination and neglect by the Ministry of Education after the ministry failed to extend the same wartime exam leniencies to them as it did to students in the secular and religious school systems.

In the wake of the recent “Am KeLavi” war between Israel and Iran, the Education Ministry announced a broad policy allowing high school students across the country to forgo external Bagrut exams and instead receive internal grades in recognition of the nationwide trauma and instability caused by the conflict. However, this policy was not applied to seminary girls in the Chareidi system, leaving them to sit for full external exams under unchanged conditions.

Seminary students describe feeling silenced, overlooked, and pushed aside. One student related with frustration, “The pressure, expectations, and demands didn’t change—as if nothing happened, as if we didn’t go through a frightening and chaotic time. The sense of discrimination is overwhelming. Why did students in the secular and national-religious schools get support, while we were abandoned? Why aren’t Chareidi girls, who suffered just as much, if not more, given the same compassion?”

Another student echoed these sentiments: “We have no one to turn to. There’s no official body that speaks on our behalf. We’re trapped in a closed system that often prefers to stay silent to avoid ‘unnecessary drama.’ But that silence comes at a cost—emotional, academic, and personal.”

A senior teacher in the Chareidi school system sided with the students, placing the blame squarely on the ministry and its inspectors. “We’re not asking for easy outs,” she said. “We want basic fairness. Recognize that this year has not been normal, and that these exams—under current conditions—do not reflect our students’ real abilities. We want equal treatment. We want the system to care about our future the way it cares about other students.”

When the Ministry of Education was asked about this, officials insisted that the wartime leniencies applied equally to all sectors, including Chareidim. However, when confronted with reports that school heads and exam supervisors in the Chareidi system had not implemented the policy, the ministry said it would investigate.

One student recounted, “I asked my teacher, who said that many had submitted requests to cancel the exams or at least receive some leniency. But the answer that came back was always the same—‘no changes to external exams despite the war.’ My teacher spoke directly with the official who deals with the ministry, and she was cold and unresponsive. She said, ‘That’s the policy from the ministry,’ and admitted there’s no one to appeal to. They’re just blocking us out.”

She added, “Another coordinator told us that they’ve received dozens, maybe hundreds, of requests from girls and parents. But they said there’s nothing to be done, and it’s not even worth trying. They don’t respond because they don’t see us as important. The teachers are defeated—there’s nowhere to turn, and every path leads to a dead end.”

In response, students have launched an online petition demanding equal treatment and urging the Education Ministry to extend the same Bagrut exemptions to Chareidi girls as to the rest of the population. They’ve also filed a direct appeal to MeravD, the department responsible for external exams.

The Ministry of Education issued a formal response: “The Ministry of Education clarifies that in the summer session of 5785, following the ‘Am KeLavi’ war, all students in all sectors—including the Chareidi sector—were granted the option of receiving an internal grade in all exams. As for the second sessions in math, English, and Hebrew grammar, those exams are being administered as external exams, and this decision applies equally to all sectors.”

{Matzav.com Israel}

Netanyahu: I Hope 10 Living Hostages Will Be Released ‘In A Few Days’

[Video below.] Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu concluded his four-day trip to Washington on Thursday night, boarding the “Wing of Zion” aircraft to return to Israel after meeting twice with President Donald Trump at the White House.

Following the visit, the Prime Minister’s Office released a statement declaring, “All the goals Netanyahu sought to achieve during the visit were accomplished.”

In an interview with Newsmax before departing, Netanyahu shared a guarded sense of hope about the possible return of ten more Israeli hostages who remain in Hamas captivity.

During the conversation, Netanyahu spoke about the current diplomatic efforts to broker a temporary pause in fighting in order to facilitate the release of hostages who were seized during the October 7, 2023, attacks.

He described the suffering endured by the 255 hostages as “hell,” calling Hamas “monsters” for their treatment of those taken.

“Well, they’re monsters. I mean what they do to them and the stories we get are horrible,” Netanyahu stated. “So it’s not easy for us when we’re doing it.”

Netanyahu stressed that Israel is resolute in its mission to recover every last hostage still being held.

“We have 50 left; 20 definitely alive, and some 30 that are not alive, and I want to take them all out,” he told Newsmax. “We now have a deal that supposedly we’ll get half of the living and half of the dead out, and so we’ll have 10 living left and about 12 deceased hostages. But I’ll get them out, too. I hope we can complete in a few days.”

The potential agreement being discussed includes a 60-day pause in hostilities. During that time, some hostages would be released, and talks would continue in pursuit of a broader end to the war. Netanyahu reiterated that peace could happen immediately “if Hamas lays down its arms.”

Shifting focus to the wider humanitarian crisis, Netanyahu condemned Hamas for its treatment of Palestinian Arabs in Gaza, accusing the terror group of hiding behind civilians and turning them into pawns in the conflict.

“It is a fighting force and a governing force in Gaza that oppresses its people, targets our people, our civilians, and uses their civilians as human shields. And then they complain that the civilian losses are because of us,” he told Newsmax. “No, we say to the civilians, ‘Leave. Leave the war zone.’ … And Hamas says, ‘You don’t go. You try to leave the war zone, we’ll shoot you.’ And they shoot them because they want the pictures of dead civilians that they are causing put on Israel’s head. And that’s what you get in TikTok and the social media: ‘Israel is deliberately killing civilians’; no, we’re not. Hamas is deliberately killing its own people, preventing them from escaping the war zone. So they’re monsters.”

Netanyahu also pointed to a significant and unusual development unfolding within Gaza: Palestinian Arabs themselves are beginning to rise up against Hamas’s iron grip.

“There are Palestinians fighting Hamas because we weaken them to this point,” Netanyahu told Newsmax. “We see something that never happened before. Palestinians in Gaza are fighting Hamas. Palestinians in Gaza are defying Hamas. Palestinians in Gaza are saying, ‘We don’t want them. We don’t want to be tyrannized and subjugated by these monsters.'”

He ended the interview with a firm message of determination: “Well, that didn’t happen before, and we think we can bring it to completion. So I wouldn’t tell you that we have a war goal that is unachievable. We’re going to defeat these monsters and get our hostages back.”

WATCH:

{Matzav.com}

Matzo Bakery in War-Torn Ukraine Awarded Prestigious Kosher Certification

Despite the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the renowned matzo bakery in Dnipro has received a top-tier kosher certification from one of the world’s leading kashrus authorities.

Rav Asher Eckstein, a senior dayan from the United States and one of the foremost figures in the global kosher certification world, traveled to the Ukrainian city of Dnipro to personally inspect and grant his certification to the matzo bakery that has continued operating even during the war. Dnipro is considered the nerve center of Jewish life in Ukraine, home to the largest organized Jewish community in the country, as well as the Menorah Center.

Rav Eckstein toured the city’s Jewish institutions together with the city’s chief rabbi and head Chabad shaliach, Rabbi Shmuel Kaminezki, and Rabbi Meir Stambler, chairman of the Federation of Jewish Communities of Ukraine.

One of the key highlights of Rav Eckstein’s visit was his inspection of the Dnipro matzo bakery, considered the largest of its kind in Europe. The bakery exports its meticulously prepared matzos to destinations including the United States. After personally examining its wheat supply and witnessing its meticulous standards, Rav Eckstein granted the bakery his personal kosher certification, which will now accompany the certifications already issued by Rabbi Meir Ashkenazi of Kfar Chabad, the OK kashrus organization, and the Dnipro Vaad Hakashrus led by Rabbi Kaminezki.

Joining Rav Eckstein on his visit were Rabbi Elisha Baram, the former head of the Dnipro kashrus division, and his successor, Rabbi Yisrael Gurevich.

During his inspection, Rav Eckstein remarked on the extraordinary level of halachic stringency upheld by the Dnipro community and its institutions. “It’s remarkable to see such high standards of kashrus being maintained in a country at war,” he said. “The commitment to halachic excellence here, despite the challenges, is clearly blessed with siyata dishmaya.”

{Matzav.com}

BAD MISTAKE: NYPD Fires Dozens of Officers After Hiring Mistake Sends Disqualified Candidates Forward In Application Process

The NYPD confirmed on Thursday that it has terminated dozens of officers who were hired despite having serious disqualifications noted during their recruitment process.

An internal probe revealed that 31 officers brought onto the force within the past two years had already received final disqualification notices, yet were still approved for employment. The department stated that once those final decisions were made, hiring them was against the law.

“The department was not legally allowed to hire these individuals and was forced to inform them that they could no longer continue as members of the NYPD,” a department spokesperson said.

Sources told 1010 WINS that Inspector Terrell Anderson, who previously oversaw the Candidate Assessment Division, made the decision to hire the disqualified applicants on his own, even though they had been officially notified they were ineligible.

That same source added that Anderson has now been reassigned and is facing significant disciplinary charges from within the department.

According to information provided to 1010 WINS, the disqualifications stemmed from serious issues in the applicants’ pasts, including failure to disclose criminal convictions, past arrests, job dismissals, multiple arrests, outstanding criminal summonses, and serious driving violations that led to license suspensions.

Patrick Hendry, president of the Police Benevolent Association, condemned the firings, saying that the fault lies not with the officers, but with the department’s flawed recruitment system. “These police officers aren’t responsible for the NYPD’s broken hiring process or the supervisors who made these decisions,” Hendry said.

He explained that the recruits believed they were eligible to serve, especially since the department had already hired and trained them. The union said it is weighing legal action to defend the affected officers and demand accountability from NYPD leadership.

“It is an absolute travesty that the department is trying to cover its tracks by summarily forcing them off the job, without affording them the same appeal process available to other applicants,” Hendry said.

The dismissals come amid mounting internal turmoil within the NYPD. Just days earlier, four former senior officials filed lawsuits alleging widespread misconduct and favoritism, including accusations that promotions were being sold for as much as $15,000.

Among the claims is that former Chief of Department Jeffrey Maddrey, who stepped down in December after sexual misconduct allegations surfaced, routinely bypassed standard protocols to appoint unqualified associates to influential roles starting in 2023.

In a lawsuit brought by ex-Chief of Detectives James Essig, he described noticing an “unusually high number” of inexperienced officers being reassigned to the sex crimes division during that period.

The legal filings further allege that current leadership, including Chief of Department John Chell, has worked to undermine internal oversight and prevent scrutiny of the department’s actions.

{Matzav.com}

Pro-Palestinian Activist Mahmoud Khalil Seeks $20m From Trump Admin

Mahmoud Khalil, an alumnus of Columbia University, is demanding $20 million in compensation from the administration of President Donald Trump after spending more than 100 days in immigration custody, according to a report by The Independent on Thursday.

In advance of a formal federal lawsuit, a court filing alleges that Khalil was the victim of politically motivated arrests and efforts to suppress campus activism. Officials in the administration claimed Khalil had engaged in “antisemitic activities” due to his involvement in anti-Israel demonstrations.

“There must be accountability for political retaliation and abuse of power,” Khalil stated. “I’m holding the US government accountable not just for myself, but for everyone they try to silence through fear, exile, or detention.”

On March 8, agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) apprehended Khalil as part of a broader effort to clamp down on campus protests critical of Israel.

At the time he was taken into custody, Khalil had become a prominent voice in student-led demonstrations nationwide opposing the war in Gaza. After his arrest, federal authorities relocated him from his residence in New York to a detention facility in Louisiana to face deportation proceedings.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio cited a Cold War-era statute passed during the 1950s Red Scare, which allows for the expulsion of foreign nationals considered detrimental to American foreign policy.

But a judge later determined that Rubio’s claims were insufficient to justify Khalil’s continued detention or deportation, ruling that the government lacked grounds to classify him as a national security threat. Khalil was subsequently granted release on bail in late June.

Officials have accused Khalil of omitting from his immigration paperwork what they called his “membership” in the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA).

Khalil denies any wrongdoing and insists his arrest and detention were punitive actions in response to his political speech.

{Matzav.com}

Captain Reei Biran Killed In The Southern Gaza Strip

The IDF Spokesperson’s Unit announced Friday morning that Captain Reei Biran, 21, a squad commander in the Golani Reconnaissance Unit of the Golani Brigade, was killed during an operation in the southern part of the Gaza Strip.

According to an initial review of the events, Biran’s unit had been tasked with targeting terrorist infrastructure in Khan Yunis. As part of their assignment, they were preparing buildings suspected of being used by terror operatives for demolition.

Roughly two hours into the mission, an explosion erupted during the rigging process. Captain Biran sustained critical injuries and was later declared dead. The IDF is actively investigating the details of the incident to determine what went wrong.

So far, 890 Israeli soldiers have died since the onset of the war.

Another casualty was cleared for publication Wednesday night: Abraham Azulay, 25, from the Shaked Farm near Yitzhar, who was killed while operating engineering equipment in Gaza. Azulay had been married only three months prior.

Azulay is the third individual from Yitzhar to lose his life in the war. He had volunteered, along with many others from his community, to assist the IDF by operating heavy engineering vehicles in the Gaza Strip.

Preliminary findings suggest that while IDF troops were conducting a mission in Khan Yunis, terrorists emerged from a subterranean tunnel and launched an attack. During the ambush, they tried to kidnap the soldier operating the engineering vehicle.

The soldier resisted the attackers but was fatally shot. Forces stationed nearby returned fire, injuring several of the terrorists and preventing the abduction. The IDF is continuing to examine the circumstances of the incident.

{Matzav.com Israel}

Trump Announces 35% Tariffs On Canada Starting Aug. 1, Warns Of Higher Levies If Ottawa Retaliates

President Donald Trump revealed on Thursday that the United States will impose a 35% tariff on goods imported from Canada beginning August 1, citing Ottawa’s retaliatory actions as the reason behind the move.

“Instead of working with the United States, Canada retaliated with its own Tariffs,” Trump wrote in a message addressed to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, which was shared publicly on Truth Social.

Trump pointed to the fentanyl crisis as a factor behind the tariff decision, suggesting that progress on that issue could potentially change the tariff plan. “If Canada works with me to stop the flow of Fentanyl, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter,” he said.

According to Trump, the new tariff rate will be distinct from any previously existing sector-specific tariffs. He warned that if Canada hits back with more trade penalties, the U.S. will respond with even higher duties. “If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 35% that we charge,” he declared.

The letter also made clear that any attempts to reroute goods to bypass the increased tariff would be met with the same penalty. “Good transshipped to evade this higher tariff will be subjected to that higher tariff,” it stated.

Trump noted that the tariff rate could either go up or be reduced based on how negotiations unfold with Canada. He stressed that the issues between the two nations aren’t limited to fentanyl. ″[Canada] has many Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies and Trade Barriers, which cause unsustainable Trade Deficits against the United States … The Trade Deficit is a major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security!”

Currently, Canadian products are subject to a 25% tariff put in place earlier this year, aimed at addressing Canada’s alleged connection to fentanyl trafficking. Exceptions have been made for those complying with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, while Canadian energy exports face a reduced 10% tariff.

The latest tariff announcement followed a June 29 agreement between the two nations to restart trade negotiations, aiming for a new deal by July 21, according to Canada’s Department of Finance.

Trump had previously threatened to call off all trade talks with Canada after it refused to halt its planned digital services tax targeting U.S. tech companies. Canada eventually dropped the tax, clearing the way for talks with Washington to resume.

{Matzav.com}

Gafni Blasts Attorney General: “If, Heaven forbid, She’s Hurt – the Chareidim Will Save Her”

At a gathering held Thursday evening in honor of United Hatzalah volunteers in Bnei Brak, MK Moshe Gafni, chairman of Degel HaTorah, delivered a fiery speech targeting Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara following her announcement of new enforcement measures aimed at yeshiva students who do not enlist in the army.

Addressing the volunteers, Gafni praised them as the true servants of Israeli society. “You are living proof that the chareidim serve, assist, and help all the citizens of Israel,” he said, lauding their selfless dedication to saving lives.

Turning to the Attorney General, Gafni’s tone turned scathing. “She’s putting up roadblocks — well, she can forget about that,” he declared. “She wants us to speak out against her so that if they try to fire her, she’ll be able to claim she’s the one standing up to the chareidim. That’s what she’s really interested in. It’s a disgrace to the State that this woman is the Attorney General.”

Then, with biting sarcasm, Gafni added, “But one thing’s for certain — if, Heaven forbid, she’s ever in an accident, it’ll be the chareidim from United Hatzalah who save her. We don’t keep score.”

His remarks came in the wake of Baharav-Miara’s endorsement of a new IDF draft enforcement plan targeting yeshiva bochurim. In a statement issued by her office, the Attorney General welcomed the military’s enforcement efforts, saying, “The Attorney General commends the progress made in formulating this year’s draft enforcement plan and the IDF’s policy to increase enforcement in the immediate term.”

She stated that “the number of recruits in the past year does not meet the security needs, the commitments of the State, or the value of equality.” The statement added that enforcement would be carried out “equitably across all sectors, with particular attention to shortening the time until draft orders are issued and until draft dodgers are formally declared — to enable quicker use of enforcement tools.”

The plan also includes a one-time opportunity for draft dodgers from all sectors to enlist without being arrested. Those who report for duty will begin regular service immediately and, if they complete one full year of proper service and meet additional conditions, their charges will be commuted and replaced with a suspended sentence.

Further steps outlined include a follow-up meeting to assess implementation, including updates on IDF activity at border crossings, proactive enforcement actions, and details regarding the expansion of detention facilities.

Due to gaps in coordination between the Education Ministry and the IDF regarding transfer of information on draft-eligible students, another meeting — headed by the Deputy Attorney General — will be held to address and resolve the issue.

The meeting summary will be forwarded to the Defense Minister’s office, emphasizing the importance of expanding the tools available to enforce the draft on those evading service.

To finalize the government’s legal response to court challenges, officials were instructed to expedite efforts to complete a comprehensive draft affidavit, including specific details about the enforcement plan, criteria for identifying draft dodgers, and IDF enforcement activities — their scope and frequency — particularly at Israel’s borders.

{Matzav.com Israel}

BIGOTED SOCIALIST: Muslim Zohran Mamdani Railed Against ‘White Privilege’ in a 2014 Newspaper

Articles written by Zohran Mamdani during his college years have resurfaced as his profile rises in New York City’s political landscape. A review by Fox News Digital reveals that Mamdani, a self-described socialist and Democratic mayoral nominee, used his time at Bowdoin College to promote radical views on race and Israel, including a call for an academic boycott of the Jewish state.

During his time at Bowdoin from 2010 to 2014, Mamdani authored 32 opinion pieces for the college newspaper, the Bowdoin Orient. In one of his final columns as a senior, Mamdani backed a push for academia to cut ties with Israel. “This academic and cultural boycott aims to bring under scrutiny the actions of the Israeli government and to put pressure on Israeli institutions to end the oppressive occupation and racist policies within both Israel and occupied Palestine,” he wrote. Mamdani also co-founded the college chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, a group now known for organizing some of the loudest anti-Israel demonstrations on campuses, especially in the wake of the October 7 Hamas massacre, with some chapters going as far as glorifying the attack.

One of Mamdani’s targets in his article was Bowdoin’s president at the time, Barry Mills, who rejected the idea of an academic boycott. “Lastly, Mills regrettably makes no mention of Palestinians or Palestine,” Mamdani wrote. “The call for the boycott comes in response to more than 60 years of Israeli colonial occupation of Palestine. When Mills speaks of the ‘free exchange of knowledge, ideas, and research, and open discourse’ in academia, he does so while privileging partnerships with Israeli institutions over basic freedoms for Palestinians, including the rights to food, water, shelter and education, which many Palestinians are denied under Israeli rule.”

In another opinion piece from 2013, Mamdani accused a fellow White student of failing to recognize his own racial privilege after the student objected to claims that the school’s editorial section lacked diversity. “White males are privileged in their near-to-exclusive featuring as figures of authority in print, on television and around us in our daily realities,” Mamdani wrote. “We, the consumers of these media, internalize this and so believe in the innate authority of a white male’s argument and the need for its publication. So, white privilege is both a structural and an individual phenomenon, the former propelling the latter. Therefore, even when the individual is silent, the structures continue to exist and frame our society through their existence.”

He further elaborated on the lack of diversity in the campus newspaper’s opinion section, calling it a product of institutional racism. Mamdani wrote that the “pervasive male whiteness” of the school’s opinion pages “builds on the sadly still-present white male monopolization of both discourse and understanding.”

Expanding on the topic, Mamdani emphasized how white privilege operates, regardless of personal experience. “While whiteness is not homogenous, white privilege is. This privilege is clear in not having to face institutional racism in access to housing subsidies, college grants, financial institutions, or civil rights. It allows a white person to universalize his own experiences. It restricts society’s ability to understand its flaws, and projects a false image of meritocracy upon a nation built on institutional racism,” he wrote.

In a separate piece titled “Bearded in Cairo,” Mamdani recounted his semester abroad in Egypt during a period of political upheaval. He wrote about choosing to grow a beard before his trip as a way to confront American stereotypes about Muslim and South Asian men. He admitted the beard was “mostly as a symbolic middle finger” to the idea, widespread in America, that people with brown skin and beards are automatically seen as “terrorists.”

While in Egypt, Mamdani reflected on how racial privilege manifested differently. “Gone was the image of the white Christian male that I had grown accustomed to, and in its place was a darker, more familiar picture – ­­­one that, for the first time, I fit: brown skin, black hair, and a Muslim name,” Mamdani wrote. “With the right clothing, some took me for an Egyptian and most thought I was Syrian – either identity allowed me unrestricted access to exploring Cairo.”

In a 2014 article marking the 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King Jr.’s visit to Bowdoin, Mamdani critiqued what he saw as complacency around diversity. Although the school had increased its non-white student population in recent years, he argued that it had fallen short of what true inclusivity required. “I have been forced to personally grapple with these inconsistencies during my time here,” Mamdani wrote.

He offered a personal window into how these shortcomings played out in everyday campus life. “I sit in class not knowing whether to correct everyone’s mispronunciation of an Indian woman’s name. I usually do, but today I’m tired. I’m tired of being one of a few non-white students in a classroom, if not the only one. I bring up race in discussions only to see the thought flicker in my peers eyes and on their tongues. They sigh without a sound. I’ve brought up race again. I’ve sidetracked the discussion. I’ve chosen to make an issue out of it.”

In the same article, Mamdani — born in Uganda to Indian parents — wrote candidly about the alienation he felt early in college. “I grow a beard only to be called a terrorist,” Mamdani wrote. “I pronounce the ‘h’ in my name only to hear muffled laughs. Clothing becomes exotic once it clads my body. Cotton shirts are called dashikis and sandals ethnic.”

He also described the insecurities he wrestled with during his freshman year. “While I am now comfortable in my own skin, I can remember wishing for whiteness my first year when I thought certain types of girls were impossible to talk to due to my skin being more kiwi than peach. Months later, I remember thinking that attraction might only be possible when a girl had ‘a thing for brown guys.’”

Despite finding a few like-minded peers, Mamdani remained frustrated by what he perceived as willful ignorance. “Still, too few people acknowledge that race is an issue on our campus, or that it has ever been one,” he wrote. “But if people say they are color blind, do they even see me?”

Mamdani captured national attention last month after an unexpected win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, despite heavy criticism of his far-left platform. His campaign has called for radical changes, such as municipal-run grocery stores, police defunding, government-sanctioned drug sites, and a $30 minimum wage.

His win has deepened the divide within the Democratic Party. While some party leaders urge a centrist course following Kamala Harris’s loss in the presidential election, others have rallied behind the progressive movement championed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who backed Mamdani’s campaign.

Now heading into the general election as the leading candidate in a city where Democrats vastly outnumber Republicans, Mamdani appears poised to extend his political rise.

{Matzav.com}

Pages