Princeton Gaza ‘Genocide’ Course Sparks Backlash
A controversial spring semester course at Princeton University has ignited criticism for asserting a “central focus on the ongoing genocide in Gaza” and proposing comparisons between the experience of Gazans and that of Jews during the Holocaust.
The course has already been denounced by American Jewish Congress, which labeled it “unacceptable” and warned, “At a time of record levels of antisemitism, this course risks fueling further hostility and making campus even more unsafe for Jewish students.”
Enrollment figures published on Princeton’s website show minimal interest so far, with just one of 14 available seats filled. The syllabus references terms such as “reproductive genocide in Gaza” and “reprocide in Gaza,” and indicates that students will study “Gaza within comparative histories of the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust and genocide against black and indigenous populations.”
Concerns over antisemitism at Princeton predate the introduction of the class. In April 2024, during the Biden Administration, the US Department of Education launched a Title VI investigation into allegations at the university following a complaint by a Jewish activist. That filing cited reports that campus pro-Palestinian protesters chanted “Intifada,” and “Brick by brick, wall by wall, apartheid has got to fall,” in the weeks after the October 7 massacre.
More recently, the Trump administration paused $210 million in federal funding to Princeton, asserting that the university “has perpetuated racist and antisemitic policies.”
Reacting to the course description, Rep. Tom Kean told JNS that it was “deeply troubling,” arguing that it “falsely characterizes Israel’s right to self-defense as ‘genocide.’”
“Israel was the victim of a brutal terrorist attack on Oct. 7 at the hands of Hamas, and any honest discussion must begin with that fact,” the New Jersey congressman said. “Hamas is a terrorist organization that deliberately targets civilians and hides behind innocent people to advance its violent agenda. While I support freedom of speech and the offering of different perspectives in the classroom, words matter.”
He continued by warning that “recklessly misusing the term ‘genocide’ does nothing to advance peace, justice, understanding or open dialogue. Israel has both the right and the obligation to defend its people, and that reality should not be erased or rewritten in the classroom.”
In response to the broader scrutiny, Princeton President Christopher Eisgruber said the university is “committed to fighting antisemitism and all forms of discrimination, and we will cooperate with the government in combating antisemitism.”
{Matzav.com}
