Feed aggregator
Harvard University Sues Trump Administration
Harvard University has initiated legal proceedings against the Trump administration, challenging the federal government’s decision to freeze $2.2 billion in research funding. The university contends that this action is an attempt to exert undue influence over its academic operations. In a lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, Harvard argues that the administration’s demands—such as auditing faculty for plagiarism, reporting international students accused of misconduct, and ensuring “viewpoint diversity” in academic departments—are unconstitutional and threaten the institution’s independence.
Harvard President Alan Garber stated that the government’s actions would have “severe and long lasting” consequences, particularly affecting critical health research projects. He emphasized that the administration’s approach bypasses established legal procedures and infringes upon the university’s First Amendment rights.
The Trump administration has justified the funding freeze by citing concerns over antisemitism on campus. However, Harvard maintains that it has taken significant steps to address such issues and that the government’s measures are disproportionate and politically motivated.
The lawsuit names several administration officials as defendants, including Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Education Secretary Linda McMahon, and Attorney General Pamela J. Bondi. Harvard seeks a court order to lift the funding freeze and prevent further governmental overreach into its academic affairs .
This legal action underscores the escalating tensions between the federal government and higher education institutions over issues of academic freedom, institutional autonomy, and the role of political considerations in educational policy. The outcome of this case may have significant implications for the relationship between universities and the federal government moving forward.
{Matzav.com}
Report: DHS Sec. Kristi Noem Robbed at DC Restaurant
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was the victim of a theft at a Washington, D.C., restaurant over the weekend, according to officials.
ABC News reported that Noem’s purse was taken by a masked individual while she was dining with her family. The bag reportedly contained $3,000 in cash, her passport, makeup kit, apartment key, a DHS access card, and various personal items.
A DHS representative confirmed that the suspect approached the table during a holiday outing and quickly fled the scene after grabbing the secretary’s purse.
According to CNN, the Secret Service reviewed surveillance video and identified the alleged thief as an unidentified white male who had been wearing a surgical mask at the time.
During Monday’s White House Easter Egg Roll, Noem acknowledged the incident and confirmed that authorities had yet to resolve the case. “The theft has not yet been solved,” she said.
ABC also noted that prescription medication belonging to Noem was among the contents of the stolen purse.
The Secret Service has launched an investigation, which remains ongoing.
{Matzav.com}
Trump Admin Ends Student Loan Grace Period, Restarting Aggressive Collections
Bar Says Netanyahu Demanded Personal Loyalty, Obedience To Him and Not Supreme Court
In a dramatic declaration to the High Court on Monday, Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar claimed that his dismissal was rooted in Israel Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu’s demand for personal allegiance — not just professional duty — and that he had been implicitly instructed to prioritize loyalty to Netanyahu over the rule of law in the event of a constitutional standoff.
Bar, in a formal response to petitions challenging his removal, asserted that he was pushed out for refusing to align himself with the prime minister’s political interests. He pointed to a series of sensitive decisions, including declining to shield Netanyahu from testifying in his corruption trial, launching probes into the conduct of Netanyahu’s inner circle, and the fallout from the October 7 Hamas attack, as factors behind the firing.
He also denied claims by Netanyahu and his allies that the Shin Bet had prior intelligence warning of the October 7 assault and failed to relay it in time. Bar provided a timeline outlining the actions taken by his agency in the hours leading up to the invasion based on the intelligence they had at the time.
Although Bar indicated he would soon announce his resignation, he emphasized that the court’s ruling on his termination would have more lasting implications than his personal exit.
Netanyahu rejected Bar’s version of events, calling it “a false statement.” The Prime Minister’s Office followed up by saying that Bar’s own admission of security failings validated the decision to remove him. The court has asked Netanyahu to formally respond to Bar’s remarks.
Bar’s dismissal was finalized on March 21, following a cabinet vote prompted by Netanyahu’s recommendation. The prime minister cited a loss of confidence in Bar’s leadership. However, critics and legal watchdogs argue that the firing was marred by conflicts of interest and procedural flaws, given Shin Bet’s active investigations into Netanyahu’s aides.
The High Court temporarily blocked the firing and urged both the government and the Attorney General to resolve the legal missteps, while inviting Bar to present his account.
Bar responded by submitting an eight-page public statement via the State Attorney’s Office, accompanied by a 31-page classified annex with supplemental documentation.
In his public remarks, Bar said tensions with Netanyahu did not emerge until late 2024. The shift, he claimed, stemmed from Netanyahu’s expectation of “personal loyalty” rather than a breakdown in professional performance. He noted that Netanyahu had previously lauded the Shin Bet’s contributions during the war, including rescuing hostages and neutralizing terrorists across multiple fronts.
Bar identified November 2024 as the critical turning point. That month, he authorized an investigation into leaked materials from the Prime Minister’s Office, declined to assert that Netanyahu could skip his court testimony on national security grounds, supported the position that political leaders bore some responsibility for the October 7 failures, and endorsed the establishment of a state commission of inquiry. He also launched an investigation into the so-called Qatargate affair, in which Netanyahu’s aides allegedly lobbied for Qatar — a nation linked to Hamas.
“This sequence of events is what brought about a turning point in the prime minister’s attitude to me, and it alone stands at the foundation of the demand to end my tenure,” Bar wrote.
On Qatargate, Bar insisted the involvement of individuals linked to a state that backs Hamas in sensitive Israeli decision-making circles demanded scrutiny — especially given Qatar’s role as a mediator in negotiations with the terror group. He warned that suspected interference by Netanyahu’s associates could jeopardize national security and hostage release efforts.
Bar also revealed that Netanyahu had asked him to take action against citizens participating in anti-government protests and requested intelligence on activists who had monitored cabinet ministers and members of the prime minister’s family.
“The expectation to monitor ‘protest funders’ was made clear to me,” Bar stated, making it known that he refused to carry out such demands.
According to Bar, these requests were made after formal meetings had ended and once military aides and record-keepers had exited the room — a tactic that would leave no official trace of the conversations.
“The prime minister addressed me multiple times in a manner that made clear his expectation that the Shin Bet act against citizens involved in protest action and demonstrations against the government,” wrote Bar.
Bar added that in Netanyahu’s official response to the court, the prime minister acknowledged that one of his grievances was Bar’s refusal to act against those organizing widespread army reserve duty boycotts — a major part of the protest movement against judicial reform.
“This shows how the prime minister viewed the job of the head of the Shin Bet and his expectations that he activate the authorities of the agency in connection with open and public demonstrations of public protest against the government and its policies in which there is no clandestine activity or threat of violence,” Bar told the court.
Bar further alleged that during discussions about these protests, he was told that in the event of a constitutional crisis, he would be expected to “obey the prime minister and not the Supreme Court,” though he did not specify who conveyed that directive.
He said that more details about that issue would be included in his classified filing.
The threat of a constitutional breakdown has loomed large throughout the current government’s push to overhaul Israel’s judiciary, sparking mass protests and deep political rifts.
Bar reiterated previous claims that Netanyahu had pressured him to submit false security justifications to the Jerusalem District Court in order to excuse the prime minister from testifying in his criminal trial.
Bar said Netanyahu “repeatedly” urged him to issue orders that would prevent the prime minister from making public appearances and from being exposed to security risks — a move that would have effectively delayed or derailed the trial.
He disclosed that a draft memo had even been prepared, which he said was likely authored by Netanyahu or his staff, and that he was asked to present it as the Shin Bet’s official position.
Bar said the full details of that episode would be laid out in his confidential filing.
Bar flatly denied allegations from Netanyahu and his allies that the Shin Bet had knowledge of Hamas’s attack plans in advance and failed to alert the necessary authorities. He provided a detailed account of the agency’s actions before and during the start of the assault.
While acknowledging operational shortcomings, Bar said claims that he failed to brief the prime minister were part of a coordinated campaign to discredit him and the agency.
He noted that months earlier, the Shin Bet had warned the government that internal divisions — largely sparked by the judicial overhaul — were being interpreted by Israel’s enemies as a window of opportunity to strike. The agency had recommended targeted military actions to reestablish deterrence.
Bar also recalled warning Netanyahu in July 2023 about a dangerously deteriorating security landscape, even issuing a rare “war alert” — something nearly unprecedented from a Shin Bet director.
He said that after detecting “unusual but not unambiguous” indicators on the night of October 6, his agency alerted top IDF officials, including those overseeing Gaza and the Southern Command, at 11 p.m.
By 3:03 a.m. on October 7, the Shin Bet issued a general alert to all security branches about possible hostile activity by Hamas, though Bar conceded that the level of warning fell short — a failure he acknowledged.
He said he arrived at the Shin Bet’s headquarters at 4:30 a.m. and instructed that Netanyahu’s military secretary be notified by 5:15 a.m.
“It is with pain that I emphasize that no one evaluated that an attack like this would erupt and certainly not on that morning,” Bar wrote. “However, the attack was ‘not coordinated by us,’ our teams were not ‘sent in order to save Shin Bet personnel,’ and on that night nothing was ‘hidden from the security establishment or the prime minister,’” he emphasized.
“Out of a deep concern for the State of Israel in general and the ability of the Shin Bet to function in particular, I saw it as my duty to bring before the court in a full and public manner the sequence of events,” Bar concluded.
“This is my duty to my successor, so that their ability to fulfill their role with professionalism, with commitment to the country, and while insisting that the authorities of the agency and its tools be used for their intended purposes alone, be preserved, and so as to clearly delineate between the trust required in democratic systems and loyalty that characterizes other regimes.”
In a blistering response, the Prime Minister’s Office declared Bar’s testimony was “full of lies,” claiming he only informed Netanyahu’s military aide at 6:13 a.m.
“Bar confirms the assertion of all government ministers that he failed miserably on October 7,” said the statement from Netanyahu’s office. “This reason alone is cause for his termination.”
The PMO added that just two days prior to the Hamas onslaught, Bar had claimed that “renewal of understandings between Israel and Hamas based on the principle of quiet in exchange for concessions reveals the potential for preserving stability in the Gaza Strip.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
Israir Receives Initial U.S. Approval to Begin Flights to New York
Shin Bet Chief Allegedly Detailed Netanyahu Misconduct in Classified Affidavit to High Court
House Republicans Urge DOJ to Charge Andrew Cuomo Over His Nursing Home Deaths Lies
Photo Essay: Pesach 5785 with Maran Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch
“THIS COUNTRY IS UNRECOGNIZABLE:” 3 Toronto-Area Jewish Stores Broken Into On Shevi’i Shel Pesach
America’s Infrastructure Under Siege as Global Cyberwar Looms
Benny’s Mother Pleads to You: Help Me Save My Child!
Discover Your Why: High-Impact Workshop for Jewish School Leaders
[COMMUNICATED]
On May 7th, join a select group of passionate Jewish school leaders at an intimate high-impact workshop.
What You’ll Leave with:
– A clear Mission Statement that drives purpose and goals.
– A powerful Vision that inspires growth and unity.
– Core Values that guide every decision, big and small.
This is not a conference. It’s a working session. Participants will leave the workshop with real, actionable frameworks to transform their leadership, and their school.
Plus, personalized 30-minute follow-up call with Robert.
Centrally located for New Jersey and New York Schools, this workshop will take place at Hilton Garden Inn, Staten Island, May 7th, 2025, 9:30 – 3:30 pm.
Bring Your Key Team Members.
Click Here to Reserve Your Spot Now!
Eligible for professional development funding – ask us how!
Brought to you by Clear Square Group – driving change in education.
Netanyahu: We’ll Achieve All War Goals; There Will Be No Civil War
At a commemorative event held Monday evening honoring Irgun fighters who lost their lives in the battle for Yaafo during Israel’s War of Independence, Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu reaffirmed Israel’s determination to see its ongoing military campaign through to the end.
“We will complete all of the war objectives. We will destroy Hamas’s rule in Gaza, return the hostages, prevent any future threat from Gaza to Israel, and return the residents safely,” Netanyahu stated.
Drawing a parallel between the historic victory in Yaffo and the present conflict, Netanyahu said, “Just as the liberation of Jaffa ended in complete victory, today we too adhere to the concept of complete victory.”
Addressing growing concerns about political division and unrest at home, the Prime Minister made a clear declaration: “There will be no civil war – there will be no civil war.”
Netanyahu concluded his speech by turning attention to Iran and pushing back against narratives in the media. “We have not given up on dealing with the Iranian threat. Do not believe what you hear on the news channels that spread poison, panic or, in short, propaganda.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
FAUCI’S MILLIONS: COVID Doc Made $3.5M During First Year of Retirement
The man once known as America’s top voice on COVID-19 is now reaping substantial rewards in retirement.
New findings shared by The Daily Caller and transparency watchdog Open the Books reveal that Anthony Fauci, who previously served as Chief Medical Advisor to the president, brought in $3.5 million during his first year away from public office.
According to The Daily Caller, financial records totaling 141 pages and reviewed by Open The Books indicate that Fauci received multiple deposits adding up to $1.15 million over the course of 2023. These records, however, do not specify where the funds originated.
Fauci has evidently capitalized on the public persona he cultivated during the pandemic, even as members of Congress increasingly scrutinize his actions and decision-making during the crisis.
In March 2023, Fauci reportedly secured a $5 million book deal with a division of Penguin Random House to publish his memoir. That same month, a congressional report disclosed that Fauci had privately “prompted” a widely circulated scientific article that dismissed the possibility of a laboratory origin for the coronavirus. On July 1, 2023, Fauci took on a new role as a distinguished university professor at Georgetown University, with appointments in both the School of Medicine and the School of Public Policy. Less than two weeks after that appointment, two of the researchers involved in the previously mentioned article appeared before Congress to discuss their communication with Fauci.
In a notable development last Friday, the White House updated the covid.gov website to spotlight the very study Fauci had reportedly influenced — “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” — as well as his role in shifting attention away from the lab-leak theory.
Throughout 2023, Fauci accepted invitations to speak before a number of professional and lobbying organizations, including the National Association of Chain Drug Stores and AHIP, which represents health insurers. Both groups have had significant stakes in the federal government’s COVID-19 strategy and dealings with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases — the NIH branch Fauci led for nearly 40 years.
Over a span of four years, Fauci’s personal fortune experienced a sharp rise — from $7.6 million at the start of 2019 to $15 million by 2023. Despite no longer holding a government role, Fauci also continued to benefit from taxpayer-funded perks, including protection and travel support provided by the U.S. Marshals Service.
More details can be found in The Daily Caller’s full report:
Israel To Charge 22 Hamas Terrorists For Oct. 7 Crimes
Israeli prosecutors have completed draft indictments against 22 alleged Hamas perpetrators of the Oct. 7, 2023 massacres in Kibbutz Nir Oz, Israeli media reported.
The report about the indictments—the first of Oct. 7 perpetrators—suggests authorities have resolved to prosecute the suspects in civilian courts, which may lack the authority to sentence terrorists to death, instead of military tribunals that have that authority.
The indictments provide the legal scaffolding for prosecuting additional suspects in atrocities and other crimes committed by the thousands of terrorists who invaded Israel from Gaza on Oct. 7, 2023, murdering some 1,200 people and abducting another 251.
The United States is reportedly conducting its own investigations into the Oct. 7 attacks and may be preparing separate indictments. According to Ynet, Israeli officials have asked their American counterparts to hold off on any legal action until Israel files its own charges.
Digital material, documents and other evidence were retrieved from combat zones in Gaza, often during Israel Defense Forces incursions, for the indictments, which prosecutors call “Case 7/10.”
Israel is in custody of roughly 300 individuals suspected of various degrees of involvement in the massacres, according to Ynet. Some were captured during the attack itself, while others were detained later during IDF operations in Gaza. Israeli officials have stated that these detainees are not intended to be included in potential prisoner exchange negotiations.
Prosecutors are debating whether to file a single indictment against all 22 suspects or to try them in smaller, separate cases, according to the news site.
The Attorney General’s Office has proposed several legal amendments to facilitate the prosecution of Hamas terrorists, including enabling court hearings in absentia of the defendants and potentially limiting defense access to some of the evidence. One proposal would even permit victim statements to be submitted in writing, bypassing live cross-examination—a move that may raise questions about defendants’ rights. The Public Defender’s office within the Justice Ministry has said it will not represent the Hamas defendants, and the issue of their legal representation is being discussed, according to the report. JNS
{Matzav.com Israel}
Asian Scam Rings Go Global, Raking in Billions Despite Crackdowns, UN Finds
Freed Hamas Hostage Dons Tefillin In ‘Death Shelter’
In an emotional full circle, former Hamas captive Eliya Cohen returned on Sunday for the first time to the shelter from which he was kidnapped and donned tefillin.
Cohen was abducted on Oct. 7, 2023, by Hamas terrorists while attending the Nova music festival with his partner, Ziv Abud.
When the rocket fire began, they fled to a shelter that later became known as the “death shelter.”
With them were Ziv’s nephew, Amit Ben Avida, and his partner Karin Schwartzman, who were both killed, while Eliya was abducted to Gaza by the terrorists.
Eliya was released from captivity after 505 days. His partner, Ziv, posted a photo of the couple at the bunker today and wrote, “I can’t write anything, just victory.” JNS
{Matzav.com Israel}
Qatar Condemns ‘Plans’ To Destroy Al-Aqsa In Response To AI Video
An A.I. video generated by a group calling itself the Temple Mount Activists envisioning a miraculous reestablishment of the Bais Hamikdosh led Qatar to condemn “plans” to destroy the Al-Aqsa mosque, in a statement put out by its foreign ministry on April 19.
“The State of Qatar strongly condemns reports of plans by groups affiliated with Israeli occupation organizations to destroy the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque and replace it with the so-called Temple,” the Ministry statement said.
“Qatar considers this a dangerous provocation that could significantly escalate violence in the region, especially amid the ongoing war on the Gaza Strip,” it added.
The A.I. video shows the Dome of the Rock suddenly engulfed in flames. In its place appears the Bais Hamikdosh with flames coming out the top while the tefillah of Shema plays. The caption, “Next year in Yerushalayim, Moshiach now,” displays toward the end of the video.
The Qatari Foreign Ministry said it unequivocally rejected “any attempt to alter the historical and legal status of Al-Aqsa Mosque, Jerusalem, or its holy sites.”
It called on the international community to halt such threats, hold the “the occupying power” (i.e. Israel) accountable, and ensure the protection of Muslim holy sites.
The statement then went on to express support for the Palestinian cause and a two-state solution.
Although Israel had not designated Qatar as an “enemy state” that Israeli citizens are prohibited from visiting without a special permit issued by the Interior Ministry (the U.S. classifies it as a major non-NATO ally), it has supported terrorist groups, including Hamas, Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood. It also runs the Al Jazeera television network, which Israel and the Palestinian Authority have banned, as have other countries in the region.
Last week, Qatar’s Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Affairs Minister Sa’oud bin Abd Al-Rahman Al Thani published and then quickly deleted a post on X saying: “We Are all Hamas.”
He also deleted a 2014 post he wrote during “Operation Protective Edge,” a war between Hamas and Israel, in which he called for Muslims in Jerusalem to “rise up” and “revolt.”
The Temple Mount Activists have posted similar videos in the past. According to WAFA, the Palestinian Authority’s news agency, the group posted an image of the construction of the Temple on Al-Aqsa’s ruins.
In September 2024, the group posted a video of Al-Aqsa burning with the caption, “Coming soon in these days.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
Shark Attacks Israeli Man Off Coast Of Hadera
Pages
