Feed aggregator
Iran Port Blaze Rages On Hours After Deadly Explosion
Improper Chemical Storage Blamed for Deadly Iran Port Explosion
Massive Explosion at Iran Port Kills 14, Injures 750
Where Are You Now?
PA President Mahmoud Abbas Appoints VP And Likely Successor
Kever of HaMekubal Rav Chaim Vital, Z’tl, Desecrated In Damascus
H’YD: IDF & Border Police Officers Killed In Battle In Gaza
Massive Explosion At Iranian Port Near IRGC Base Kills 8, Injures Around 750
Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries Brags About Stopping Efforts to Ensure Only Citizens Can Vote
Democrat Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) boasted about his party’s success in blocking initiatives aimed at ensuring that only American citizens are allowed to vote in federal elections.
Speaking about President Donald Trump’s March 25 executive order, titled “PRESERVING AND PROTECTING THE INTEGRITY OF AMERICAN ELECTIONS,” Jeffries commented, “So-and-so signed the so-called executive order. It was a voter suppression Executive Order, trying to do all of the things that the so-called SAVE Act is trying to do, but trying to do it through executive action.”
The executive order affirms, “Under the Constitution, State governments must safeguard American elections in compliance with Federal laws that protect Americans’ voting rights and guard against dilution by illegal voting, discrimination, fraud, and other forms of malfeasance and error,” and further argues that America has “not adequately enforced Federal election requirements that, for example, prohibit States from counting ballots received after Election Day or prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote.”
The directive also outlines that within 30 days, the Election Assistance Commission must adjust its national mail voter registration form to require proof of U.S. citizenship and additional documentation details, while taking care to maintain information security standards.
Despite these efforts, Jeffries made clear that he is opposed to such measures. “He does not have the power to do that. And so all the Democrats, the House Democrats, partnered with the Senate Democrats partnered with the Democratic National Committee, partnered with the Democratic Governors Association, and I even joined the lawsuit. Is it up on screen? I even joined the lawsuit as an individual on your behalf,” Jeffries said, proudly.
He went on to say, “And I like this name Jeffries versus Trump, and so we sued him in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and we believe we will win.”
This week, a federal judge temporarily halted part of Trump’s executive order.
In a 120-page ruling, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote, according to NPR, “Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States — not the President — with the authority to regulate federal elections,” while noting that Congress is presently deliberating the SAVE Act, legislation that would require proof of citizenship for voter registration.
Judge Kollar-Kotelly, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, further emphasized, “[N]o statutory delegation of authority to the Executive Branch permits the President to short-circuit Congress’s deliberative process by executive order.”
The court ruling has stirred concern among conservatives, who see it as another example of judges using their positions to obstruct President Trump’s Make America Great Again agenda, which voters supported last November.
Jeffries’ stance, however, comes as little shock, given his previous skepticism regarding any broad public support for the MAGA movement.
“Despite the claims of some of my Republican colleagues who have spent a lot of time over the last two weeks talking about some big, massive mandate, I’m looking for it,” Jeffries said in November following former Vice President Kamala Harris’s significant election loss.
He added, “That doesn’t mean that we don’t have to make adjustments to make sure that we can get beyond fighting House Republicans with a national wave on top of us to withdraw,” before dismissing the idea of a sweeping conservative mandate: “But the question about this notion of some mandate to make massive far-right extreme policy changes — it doesn’t exist.”
“It doesn’t exist,” Jeffries stressed once again.
{Matzav.com}
Feds Launch Discrimination Probe Against NY Officials — After Trump Backs Massapequa Chiefs Name
The U.S. Department of Education opened an investigation Friday into allegations of “race-based discrimination” by New York state officials after President Trump spoke out in support of the Massapequa School District’s use of its “Massapequa Chiefs” nickname, The Post has learned.
Federal officials will examine whether the New York State Board of Regents is violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits racial and national origin discrimination by any institution receiving federal funding, by enforcing its ban on Native American-related school mascots and symbols.
“The US Department of Education will not stand by as the state of New York attempts to rewrite history and deny the town of Massapequa the right to celebrate its heritage in its schools,” said Education Secretary Linda McMahon.
McMahon continued, “While New York chooses to prioritize erasing Native Americans, their rich history, and their deep connection the state, it is requiring schools to divert time and resources away from what really matters: educating our students.”
She added, “It is not lost on the Department that there are several mascots that refer to indigenous or ethnic groups – the Vikings, Fighting Irish, the Cowboys – and yet New York has specifically singled out Native American heritage. We will investigate this matter fully.”
This probe follows a formal complaint filed by the Native American Guardians Association, an advocacy organization based in North Dakota, with the Department’s Office of Civil Rights. The group claims New York’s policy is illegal under federal law.
The association, which has advocated for professional sports teams and schools retaining Native American names and imagery, argued that New York “is solely targeting Native American groups and images by attempting to eliminate them from athletic contests” and further stated that “[t]he decision to single out Native Americans as a class of people that cannot be represented in public school imagery is per se discriminatory.”
Frank Blackcloud, vice president of the association, said the policy leads to “dwindling expressions or our presence and contributions” to the history of the United States.
New York officials maintain that the rule, enacted in 2023, aims to dismantle harmful stereotypes, and have warned that districts such as Massapequa could lose state funding if they do not comply. The Massapequa school board is currently challenging the mandate in court.
Although a judge ruled against the Massapequa district last month, the federal investigation could ultimately put the state’s own funding at risk if it refuses to reverse course.
President Trump weighed in earlier this week on social media, stating: “I agree with the people in Massapequa, Long Island, who are fighting furiously to keep the Massapequa Chiefs logo on their Teams and School. Forcing them to change the name, after all of these years, is ridiculous and, in actuality, an affront to our great Indian population.”
He added: “It has become the School’s identity and, what could be wrong with using the name, ‘Chief’? I don’t see the Kansas City Chiefs changing their name anytime soon! By copy of this TRUTH, I am asking my highly capable Secretary of Education, Linda McMahon, to fight for the people of Massapequa on this very important issue. LONG LIVE THE MASSAPEQUA CHIEFS!”
Kerry Watcher, president of the Massapequa Board of Education, applauded the federal government for stepping in to defend the district.
“We thank the Department of Education and the Trump administration for standing with Massapequa in our effort to preserve the Chiefs name and honor our community’s proud history,” Watcher said.
“We’re especially grateful to the Native American Guardians Association for their support and advocacy. Attempts to erase Native American imagery do not advance learning — they distract from our core mission of providing a high-quality education grounded in respect, history, and community values.”
{Matzav.com}
Israel’s Oldest Holocaust Survivor Passes Away at 110
Israel bid farewell on Thursday to Nechama Grossman, the nation’s oldest Holocaust survivor, who passed away at the remarkable age of 109. Her passing coincided with Holocaust Remembrance Day, a day devoted to memorializing the six million Jews who perished. Grossman’s funeral was held the next day in Arad, the southern city where she had made her home for most of her life.
Born in 1915, Grossman survived the horrors of Europe during the Holocaust and eventually made her way to Israel, settling in Arad and raising a family there. Her resilience became a living testament to the strength of the Jewish people in the aftermath of unimaginable suffering.
Kan reported that Grossman leaves behind a large and growing family: two children, four grandchildren, eight great-grandchildren, and two great-great-grandchildren. Earlier this week, just days before her passing, her son Vladimir Schwatz spoke publicly about her enduring legacy.
“My mother is one of the oldest Holocaust survivors in the world,” he shared. “She experienced the worst and she survived. We must all remember her Holocaust story, remember her survival, so that her past never becomes our future.”
On the same day, another survivor’s life came to a close. Eve Kugler, a longtime advocate for Holocaust education, died at the age of 94 in London. Kugler had been planning to join this year’s March of the Living at Auschwitz but was ultimately unable to make the trip.
Kugler had been a familiar presence at March of the Living events over the years, including participating in last year’s gathering. Her lifelong commitment to Holocaust remembrance had touched countless lives.
Born in Germany in 1931, Kugler lived through the traumatic events of Kristallnacht at the age of seven. In 1939, her family fled to France in search of safety. Two years later, she managed to reach the United States aboard a ship, where she and her siblings lived in foster care in New York until they were reunited with their parents after the war’s conclusion in 1946.
After completing her studies at the University of Pennsylvania, Kugler pursued a career in photojournalism. Later, she relocated to London, where she became a well-known figure in Holocaust education, tirelessly speaking to audiences and participating in programs that honored the victims of the Nazi atrocities.
{Matzav.com}
US DOJ Rules: UNRWA Not Immune From Lawsuit Over October 7 Hamas Attacks
The U.S. Department of Justice officially notified the Southern District Court of New York that it no longer recognizes the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) as enjoying legal immunity, a dramatic shift from Washington’s earlier stance, according to a JNS report.
This announcement marks a pivotal moment in a lawsuit filed last year by families of victims who were murdered or kidnapped during the horrific Hamas onslaught in southern Israel on October 7, 2023. The plaintiffs accuse UNRWA of playing a role in the massacre, while Israel has disclosed that at least 18 UNRWA employees allegedly took part in the atrocities.
The suit also asserts that billions of dollars in humanitarian aid directed to Gaza through UNRWA were diverted to Hamas and associated terror groups, funding their attacks instead of helping civilians.
“The complaint in this case alleges atrocious crimes committed by Hamas on Oct. 7, and its factual allegations, taken as true, detail how UNRWA played a significant role in those heinous offenses,” wrote the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York in a court filing submitted to Judge Analisa Torres.
The Justice Department openly acknowledged that its interpretation of UNRWA’s legal status had evolved. “Previously, the government expressed the view that certain immunities shielded UNRWA from having to answer those allegations in American courts,” the DOJ wrote. “The government has since re-evaluated that position and now concludes that UNRWA is not immune from this litigation. Nor are the bulk of other defendants.”
In the filing, the government emphasized that although UNRWA was created via a resolution by the UN General Assembly, it does not satisfy the criteria necessary to be considered an actual organ of the United Nations. The Justice Department also cast doubt on whether the General Assembly had legitimate authority under international law to establish such a body.
This revised legal position sharply diverges from the earlier approach taken by the Biden administration, which had shielded UNRWA and the broader United Nations from lawsuits by arguing that they were covered under diplomatic immunity protections.
If the court sides against UNRWA’s claim to immunity, the agency — along with its leadership and possibly even the United Nations itself — could be forced to pay out significant financial compensation to the families of victims.
Responding to the Justice Department’s filing, a spokesperson for UN Secretary-General António Guterres told JNS, “We have seen the letter filed by the U.S. Department of Justice with the court. We will review it carefully.”
“The position of the United Nations is longstanding and clear. UNRWA is a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and, as such, is entitled to immunity from legal process under the 1946 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations,” the statement continued. UNRWA itself issued an identical response.
For years, critics have accused UNRWA of cooperating with Hamas. Those criticisms reached a fever pitch after Israel disclosed last year that UNRWA staff were involved in the October 7 Hamas attacks.
Israel also produced a dossier showing that UNRWA personnel participated directly in violent acts, including abducting a woman, distributing ammunition, and taking part in the slaughter at Kibbutz Be’eri, where 97 innocent civilians were killed.
In the wake of these disclosures, Guterres appointed a panel led by former French Foreign Minister Catherine Colonna to investigate the Israeli accusations.
That review group released its findings this past April, reporting the existence of “neutrality-related issues” within UNRWA, but also claiming that Israel had yet to furnish proof that a large portion of UNRWA’s workforce belonged to terrorist networks.
More recently, disturbing allegations surfaced when Emily Damari, a former hostage held by Hamas for 470 days, said she had been imprisoned inside an UNRWA facility.
Damari, who holds citizenship in both Britain and Israel, told British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that she was denied proper medical care during her captivity at an UNRWA school.
Tom Fletcher, the UN’s top humanitarian aid official, later pushed back against Damari’s account, insisting he has “not seen a shred of evidence” linking the UN or its employees to the detention of hostages inside Gaza.
{Matzav.com}
Trump: I Told Netanyahu to Be Good to Gaza
During a conversation with reporters today, President Donald Trump shared that he had recently discussed the situation in Gaza with Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
“I told him to be good to Gaza,” Trump stated, mentioning that he had encouraged Netanyahu to ensure the provision of medicine and food to the residents of the area.
Addressing Iran, Trump was clear and to the point, saying, “The Iran deal is simple. They can’t have a nuclear weapon.” He also noted that ongoing discussions between the United States and Iran were “going very well.”
Earlier this week, Trump revealed that he and Netanyahu had spoken and touched upon several important topics. He emphasized that the United States and Israel were fully aligned on each matter they discussed.
“I’ve just spoken to Prime Minister of Israel, Bibi Netanyahu, relative to numerous subjects including Trade, Iran, etc. The call went very well—We are on the same side of every issue,” Trump posted on Truth Social.
Additionally, Trump stressed that Hamas would not be permitted to assume any role in the leadership of Gaza once the fighting concluded.
“We’re not going to let Hamas do that, and we’re going to see what happens with Gaza,” he said when questioned by a reporter about the Strip’s future governance.
Reflecting on the broader picture in the region, Trump pointed to the advances achieved under his leadership.
“We’ve made a lot of progress in the Middle East. Tremendous. That date, that very special date, October 7th, should have never happened. It would have never happened if I were president,” he remarked.
{Matzav.com}
Trump: ‘Crimea Will Stay with Russia’
In an interview released Friday, President Donald Trump stated that “Crimea will stay with Russia,” marking another moment where he urged Ukraine to concede territory in hopes of ending the ongoing war.
“Zelenskyy understands that,” Trump said, referencing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. “And everybody understands that it’s been with them for a long time.”
Trump’s remarks came during a conversation with Time magazine earlier in the week. He has consistently accused Zelenskyy of prolonging the war by refusing to negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Crimea, a vital region situated on the Black Sea, was annexed by Russia back in 2014 during President Barack Obama’s administration, long before the broader conflict erupted in 2022.
“They’ve had their submarines there for long before any period that we’re talking about, for many years. The people speak largely Russian in Crimea,” Trump said. “But this was given by Obama. This wasn’t given by Trump.”
As Trump discussed Crimea, Russian attacks continued across Ukraine. A drone strike on an apartment building in southeastern Ukraine killed three civilians and injured ten others, just one day after Trump criticized Russia’s leadership over a deadly assault on Kyiv.
Among those killed in Pavlohrad, located in Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk region, were a child and a 76-year-old woman, according to Serhii Lysak, the regional governor, who posted about the tragedy on Telegram.
Ukraine’s air force reported that Russian forces launched 103 Shahed and other drones overnight targeting five Ukrainian regions. Officials in the Sumy and Kharkiv areas confirmed civilian infrastructure was hit, but there were no immediate reports of additional casualties.
The conflict could be reaching a critical stage, with the Trump administration reportedly weighing the possibility of stepping back if progress toward a peace deal is not achieved soon, which could also result in U.S. military aid being scaled down.
While diplomatic efforts stumble, Russia unleashed a massive assault on Kyiv Thursday, killing at least 12 civilians and injuring 87 more—the deadliest attack on the Ukrainian capital since last summer.
Trump, who rarely criticizes Putin directly, expressed disapproval of the assault. “I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV. Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!”
{Matzav.com}
Trump: ‘I’ve Made 200 Deals’ on Tariffs
In a newly published interview with Time magazine, President Donald Trump revealed that he has already secured “200 deals” related to tariffs and predicted that all of the arrangements will be finalized within the coming month.
The interview, part of a feature marking his first 100 days in office, followed a question referencing trade adviser Peter Navarro’s earlier assertion that “90 deals in 90 days” would be achieved. The interviewer challenged that claim, pointing out, “We’re now 13 days into the point from when you lifted the reciprocal, the discounted reciprocal tariffs. There’s zero deals so far. Why is that?”
Trump responded firmly, “No, there’s many deals.” Pressed on when those agreements would be formally disclosed, he emphasized that discussions were underway with various companies and allied nations, saying, “We’re meeting with China,” and adding, “We’re doing fine with everybody. But, ultimately, I’ve made all the deals.”
When asked to clarify the timeline for announcing these agreements, Trump offered an extended metaphor to describe his approach to trade: “Because the deal is a deal that I choose,” he said. “View it differently: We are a department store, and we set the price. I meet with the companies, and then I set a fair price — what I consider to be a fair price — and they can pay it, or they don’t have to pay it. They don’t have to do business with the United States, but I set a tariff on countries. Some have been horrible to us. Some have been OK. Nobody’s been great.”
Trump explained that these tariffs would be determined using objective measures. “Fairly according to the statistics,” he said, elaborating that he considers various economic factors. “Do they have the VAT [value-added tax] system in play? Do they charge us tariffs? How much are they charging us? How much have they been charging us? Many, many different factors.”
He also brought up broader concerns beyond just trade policy, including military expenditures that the United States shoulders abroad. “As an example, we have Korea. We pay billions of dollars for the military. Japan, billions for those and others,” Trump said. “But that, I’m going to keep us a separate item, the paying of the military. [In] Germany, we have 50,000 soldiers.”
Pressed again for a timeframe on when the deals would be made public, Trump offered a definitive forecast. “Over the next three to four weeks, and we’re finished, by the way … we’ll be finished,” he said, noting that “some countries” might come back seeking “an adjustment,” which he’d be open to reviewing.
He also claimed the impact of the tariffs has been transformative for domestic investment. “We have $7 trillion of new plants, factories, and other things, investment coming into the United States,” Trump said. “If you look back at past presidents, nobody was anywhere near that. And this is in three months.”
Regarding China, Trump said he does not plan to initiate further calls with President Xi Jinping, although he noted that the Chinese leader has already contacted him. “He’s called,” said Trump. “I don’t think that’s a sign of weakness on his behalf.”
When asked what Xi said during their exchange, Trump responded with another store analogy. “We all want to make deals. But I am this giant store. It’s a giant, beautiful store, and everybody wants to go shopping there. And on behalf of the American people, I own the store, and I set prices, and I’ll say, if you want to shop here, this is what you have to pay.”
And when challenged on whether confusion exists around the administration’s tariff policy, Trump flatly denied it. “The only thing — they have an option,” he said. “They don’t have to shop here. They can go someplace else, but there aren’t too many places they can go.”
{Matzav.com}
Agudath Israel of America Celebrates Universal Voucher Expansion in Indiana
Rabbi A.D. Motzen, Agudath Israel’s national director of government affairs with executive director of the Indiana Nonpublic Education Association John Elcesser and associate director Chris Bunson, outside House chambers just prior to the vote.
A high res version of the image above is available for download here or by clicking on the image.
In the early hours of Friday morning, the Indiana General Assembly voted in favor a budget that provides school vouchers to all students in the state regardless of their income. This victory for families comes sixteen years after Indiana passed its first school choice program in 2009.
The happy ending came after the Senate ultimately went along with the expansion supported by the House and Governor, albeit delaying the start date by a year.
Starting in the 2026-2027 school year, every student in the state will be eligible for a scholarship worth approximately $7,000 to attend the private school of their choice.
Indiana became the 17th state to offer universal school choice just a few hours after Texas passed its universal Education Savings Account.
This expansion will relieve schools and the state from the burden of collecting financial information from parents and will finally treat voucher students equal to those attending public and charter schools. Agudath Israel has consistently argued that just as the government doesn’t ask for financial information from parents before allowing a child to attend a public or charter school at taxpayer expense why should it require such information for a child to receive a voucher for half that amount?
Indiana also has a separate scholarship tax credit and education savings account programs which provide funding to eligible students and remain unchanged.
“Agudath Israel thanks Governor Mike Braun, Speaker Todd Huston and Chairman Bob Behning for their leadership,” said Rabbi A.D. Motzen, Agudath Israel’s national director of government affairs. “Indiana’s incremental approach has already helped more than 70,000 students access a tuition scholarship and will now send a clear message that all students deserve the same freedom and opportunity.”
{Matzav.com}
Traveling to Israel? Don’t Forget Your ETA!
Ex-US Rep. George Santos Sentenced To Over 7 Years In Prison For Fraud And Identity Theft
Lyin’ Ex-Rep. George Santos Sobs As He Learns His Fate At Sentencing In Corruption Case
George Santos, once a rising figure in New York politics who rapidly fell from grace, was sentenced on Friday in his wide-ranging federal corruption case—and broke down in tears as the judgment was delivered.
U.S. District Judge Joanna Seybert sentenced Santos, the ex-congressman from Long Island, to seven years and three months in prison. He was also ordered to pay $373,000 in restitution. Santos had built his campaign on a foundation of fabrications and deception, and his lies eventually caught up with him in court.
Santos, 36, admitted guilt back in August to charges of wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. In doing so, he confessed to duping donors and using the identities of multiple individuals—including relatives and acquaintances—to artificially boost his donor list.
Although he held his congressional seat for less than a full term, having flipped a district covering parts of Queens and Nassau County, Santos was expelled in December 2023, becoming only the sixth member of the U.S. House of Representatives ever to be removed from office.
Since his ouster from Congress, Santos has turned to selling custom video messages through the platform Cameo, charging $100 per clip. On the day of his sentencing, he declined to take questions from reporters as he arrived in court, but earlier in the day he posted the word “Soon” with prayer-hand emojis on X.
Federal prosecutors had requested the maximum sentence under guidelines—seven years—pointing to Santos’ behavior both online and offline as evidence that he hadn’t shown genuine contrition.
In their filings, the prosecution cited recent posts from Santos, including one where he described himself as a “scapegoat,” and argued these showed he lacked remorse and was still lashing out at the justice system.
Defense attorneys countered the accusations, explaining that Santos’ online criticism was a response to what he saw as an overly severe punishment—not an indication that he didn’t regret his actions. They maintained he remained “profoundly sorry” for his conduct.
Santos won election in 2022, but it wasn’t long before the truth about his background began to unravel. He had falsely stated that he earned degrees from Baruch College and New York University and that he had been employed at financial powerhouses like Citigroup and Goldman Sachs. In fact, he had no college diploma and had never held direct positions at those companies.
By May 2023, a 23-count federal indictment was brought against him, alleging a variety of financial crimes tied to his campaign activities between October 2021 and October 2022.
Prosecutors laid out how Santos misled Congress about his finances, accepted unemployment benefits despite being employed, and misused campaign donations to support an extravagant lifestyle that included designer clothes, Botox treatments, and luxury getaways.
The scandal also ensnared his former campaign treasurer, Nancy Marks, who was charged and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud. She is expected to be sentenced next month, with prosecutors recommending a term of between three and a half to four years.
In a recent interview with NY1, Santos said he hoped to be held in protective custody once incarcerated, expressing concern for his personal safety.
He also admitted in that same conversation that he currently does not have the financial means to repay the restitution sum included in his plea agreement.
Santos is expected to report to prison on July 25 to begin serving his sentence.
{Matzav.com}
Pages
