Feed aggregator
United Sued For Records To See If Anti-Israel Union Pressured Carrier To Halt Tel Aviv Flights
United Airlines has—for the second time—resumed flights to Israel shortly after a lawsuit was filed against the fourth-largest domestic carrier, seeking internal documents about how and why it opted to halt flights to the Jewish state.
On May 30, the National Center for Public Policy Research filed the suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, demanding access to the Chicago-based, Delaware-incorporated airline’s records to see if it violated its fiduciary duties to shareholders by giving in to calls from its anti-Israel union to boycott the Jewish state.
The conservative think tank owns 123 United shares worth about $10,350.
The suit also seeks information about whether United colluded illegally with its partner, Turkish Airlines. “Turkish Airlines, a key Star Alliance partner of United, is partially controlled by the Turkish government, which has publicly called for and engages in a boycott of Israel,” per the complaint.
Anat Beck, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, told JNS that “Israel is about 2% of their market share, and they hid it in their financial statements—how much it’s hurting.” Securities laws require the airline to disclose the financial impact of its decisions, she said.
Before the Hamas-led terror attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, the airline operated 28 weekly flights to Tel Aviv—more than any other U.S. carrier. It suspended such flights on Oct. 7, and as of April 2025, it has “resumed only 14 weekly flights—a 50% reduction,” per the complaint. “United’s own 8-K filings and quarterly earnings reports confirm that this suspension resulted in a material decline in earnings, including an estimated $0.15 per share in lost earnings for each month of suspended operations.” (According to the think tank, United’s stock price fell 16.6%, while El Al’s rose 60%.)
Extrapolated, Beck says, that’s about $1.6 billion of lost earnings annually, or closing in on $3 billion since the war began.
“Despite these adverse financial impacts, United did not disclose the role of union influence in its public filings,” per the suit. “Statements by the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA and media reports indicate that the flight attendants’ union exerted internal political pressure to prevent resumption of the Tel Aviv route for ideological, not safety, reasons.”
Other airlines resumed flights to Israel “well before” United did so on March 15, per the suit.
“The Lufthansa Group resumed flights on Feb. 1, 2025, through all its subsidiaries— including Swiss International Air Lines, Austrian Airlines, Brussels Airlines and Eurowings. Air France also resumed flights to Tel Aviv in early 2025,” the complaint states. “In contrast, United failed to provide shareholders with a clear explanation or any disclosed risk assessment regarding its prolonged suspension.”
“Notably, El Al Israel Airlines maintained uninterrupted service to Tel Aviv throughout the entire conflict period,” it adds.
The U.S. State Department issued some travel advisories during the war, but neither Foggy Bottom nor the Federal Aviation Administration directed airlines to stop flying to Tel Aviv due to security risks, per the suit.
United resumed service to Tel Aviv in March 2024, canceled flights in April—after Iran attacked Israel—restarted in May and suspended flights again in August 2024, amid rising tensions between Israel and Hezbollah.
The airline’s announcement in February that it would resume flights to Israel in mid-March came after the National Center for Public Policy Research sent the carrier a books and records request. After the May 4 Houthi missile attack on the airport in Tel Aviv, United again suspended flights.
Beck told JNS that United immediately resumed flying to Israel after the National Center’s letter in February, and United told the plaintiffs that the allegations regarding union pressure were false.
“Now that we did it again, same thing. As soon as we filed this action—within two hours—they returned the flight,” Beck told JNS. “Maybe it’s a coincidence, but it happened twice.” (United declined to respond to JNS questions.)
The think tank didn’t file a suit in February, since United immediately returned to flying to the Jewish state, according to Beck.
Mark Goldfeder, an attorney for the plaintiffs and CEO and director of the National Jewish Advocacy Center, stated that “shareholders have a right to know whether it is true, as the evidence appears to suggest, that United bowed to ideological pressure to join a silent boycott of Israel.”
The complaint notes that United’s Feb. 4 statement about resuming its flights to Tel Aviv was a “sharp and troubling departure from the company’s longstanding practice of attributing route suspensions and resumptions exclusively to operational, commercial or safety considerations.”
“In an unprecedented move, United stated that the decision ‘follows a detailed assessment of operational considerations for the region and close work with the unions who represent our flight attendants and pilots,’” per the lawsuit. “This marked the first time United has publicly acknowledged union input as a determinative factor in the resumption of international flight operations.”
“The inclusion of unions in this context suggests an unusually high degree of influence or involvement in what is normally a management-level strategic or safety decision,” the complaint adds.
Per the suit, Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, has supported boycotts of the Jewish state, and the union has pushed for a ceasefire, advocated for Washington to cut off military aid to the Jewish state and defended anti-Israel protesters on campus.
“AFA expects every one of our airlines to ensure the safety and security of crew on layover,” the union told JNS. “Our advocacy with airline management, no matter the destination, is solely focused on flight attendant safety and security. Any assertion otherwise is unfounded and delusional.” JNS
{Matzav.com}
FIVE TOWNS: Fire, Vandalism, and Antisemitic Graffiti: Jewish Community Rocked By Multiple Overnight Incidents
Sullivan County Community Leaders and Law Enforcement Hold Summer Safety Briefing
Dr. Phil Visits Boro Park Hatzolah Garage, Impressed by Lifesaving Mission
Trump Praises National Guard Deployment, Claims It Saved Los Angeles from Violent Riots
WAYMO Halts Self-Driving Taxis in Downtown LA After Rioters Burn Vehicles
LA Mayor Karen Bass Blames Immigration Raids for Violent Anti-ICE Chaos
VP Vance Rejects Gaza Genocide Claims, Expresses Concern for Palestinian Suffering
Trump Says ‘I Would’ Arrest Gavin Newsom After California Gov Dares Border Czar To Cuff Him
President Trump stated on Monday that if he held the position of border enforcement chief Tom Homan, he wouldn’t hesitate to place California Governor Gavin Newsom under arrest, following violent unrest connected to anti-ICE demonstrators in Los Angeles over the weekend.
“I would do it, if I were Tom,” Trump said as he spoke to reporters upon arriving back at the White House from Camp David.
“Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing,” the president added.
“I like Gavin Newsom. He’s a nice guy, but he’s grossly incompetent, everybody knows that.”
The confrontation escalated after Newsom publicly challenged Homan during a Sunday night interview with NBC News, saying the Trump administration official should “come after me. Arrest me. Let’s just get it over with, tough guy.”
On Monday, Newsom followed up on social media with a sharp response to Trump’s remarks: “The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America. I don’t care if you’re a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism.”
Homan had earlier suggested that both Governor Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could potentially face prosecution for interfering with federal agents attempting to detain illegal immigrants.
“I’ll say it about anybody,” Homan said during an NBC interview on Shabbos.
“You cross that line, it’s a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It’s a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.”
By Monday morning, Homan had softened his language, appearing on NBC once again to clarify his remarks. “I never threatened to arrest Governor Newsom,” he said, claiming his comments had been misconstrued.
President Trump had already taken action over the weekend, directing 2,000 National Guard troops to be dispatched to California in response to escalating demonstrations.
Troops began arriving Sunday, as fires broke out and demonstrators waved foreign flags, including that of Mexico, in support of undocumented immigrants.
“We made a great decision in sending the National Guard to deal with the violent, instigated riots in California. If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated,” Trump posted on Truth Social while returning to Washington from Camp David.
He went on to mock local leadership in a sarcastic tone: “The very incompetent ‘Governor,’ Gavin Newscum, and ‘Mayor,’ Karen Bass, should be saying, ‘THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR.’ Instead, they choose to lie to the People of California and America by saying that we weren’t needed, and that these are ‘peaceful protests.’”
Trump concluded with a vow to uphold public safety, writing, “we will always do what is needed to keep our Citizens SAFE, so we can, together, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”
{Matzav.com}
Yasser Abu Shabab’s “Popular Forces” Recruits Gazans for Administrative Roles to Rival Hamas Rule
MAILBAG: Are We Teaching Our Girls to Love Torah – Or to Fear Nonconformity?
Can Western Civilization Survive? Douglas Murray Speaks With Rabbi Daniel Schonbuch LMFT [Full Interview]
Shas Official: We Don’t Want Elections, But Draft Law Deadlock Is A Problem
As the Knesset prepares for a crucial vote on dissolution this Wednesday, a high-ranking member of Shas told Arutz Sheva on Monday that the party has no desire to bring down the current coalition.
“No one wants elections, and we’re not eager to bring down the government. If any party stands to be hurt by its fall — it’s Shas,” the insider emphasized.
The official acknowledged the tense political situation, noting, “We are clearly caught in a difficult bind. When [Likud MK] Yuli Edelstein shows zero flexibility on the most critical issue for the haredi public, that’s a problem.”
He continued by criticizing the current dynamics among the chareidi factions. “There’s no way Degel Hatorah and Agudas Yisrael will vote for dissolution because the Draft Law remains unresolved, while Shas serves as the ‘Shabbos goy’ keeping the coalition afloat solely for political gain.”
Despite the political impasse, the official offered a potential path forward. “If Edelstein budges even slightly, it may be possible to present a compromise formula to the rabbis that would delay the dissolution bill. But there’s no doubt that the keys lie in Edelstein’s hands and those of the legal advisors backing him.”
{Matzav.com Israel}
Netanyahu’s Trial Paused Early For ‘Important Diplomatic Call’
Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu returned to the witness stand on Monday for the third round of cross-examination in the Tel Aviv District Court as part of the proceedings in Case 1000. The questioning was conducted by lead prosecutor Attorney Yonatan Tadmor.
Defense attorney Amit Hadad, representing Netanyahu, asked the court to wrap up the session earlier than expected, requesting that it conclude at 1:45 p.m. He explained the need for the early adjournment by citing “an important diplomatic call.”
In response, Prosecutor Tadmor asked the judges to reschedule the missed time for another session to ensure no time was lost in the ongoing proceedings.
During a recess, a disruption occurred when a demonstrator entered the courtroom and began yelling insults at Netanyahu. The protester shouted, “Loser, zero, take that smile off your face.” Court security quickly removed the individual from the premises.
Addressing the disturbance, Hadad turned to the judicial panel and stated firmly: “Next time that happens, the defense team will leave the courtroom in protest. This is hooliganism and blatancy, verbal violence.”
Later in the session, Tadmor argued that part of the testimony that had been heard in closed session should now be made public.
“I am approaching the chapter where the questions thus far were behind closed doors. The reasoning was invasion of privacy. However, since September 2024, Mr. Packer was interviewed by Australian media in an extensive article, which is public, and there he laid out the difficulties that he is facing in a much broader manner than was brought up here.”
Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman asked Tadmor for clarification on his position: “Is that a request, or are you bringing this to our attention so that we consider it?”
Tadmor answered clearly: “I am requesting. There is no longer justification for closed doors.” The judge instructed him to file a formal motion so the court could deliberate on the matter appropriately.
Case 1000 centers on accusations that Netanyahu improperly received valuable gifts from affluent associates. Authorities began their investigation in 2016, focusing on claims that Netanyahu and his wife Sarah had accepted luxury items from Hollywood producer Arnon Milchan and his associate, Australian investor James Packer. These included pricey cigars, bottles of champagne, and fine jewelry—items allegedly worth thousands of dollars, far exceeding what Israeli lawmakers are permitted to accept under Knesset ethics rules.
Prosecutors allege that in exchange for these gifts, Netanyahu took actions to benefit Milchan, including efforts related to tax benefits, regulatory matters, and facilitating a U.S. visa. He is facing charges of fraud and breach of trust.
{Matzav.com Israel}
Hamas-Qatar Efforts Against Trump’s Peace Plan Uncovered In Documents In Gaza
Russia Launches Biggest Drone Attack On Ukraine Since Start Of War — With Almost 500 Individual Strikes
Russia unleashed its most extensive drone assault on Ukraine since the war began, with nearly 500 aerial attacks carried out, just one day after American officials had warned that such a large-scale response from Moscow was imminent.
According to the Ukrainian air force, Russian troops launched 479 drones along with 20 missiles during the overnight offensive. The barrage marked a dramatic escalation in Moscow’s military operations.
Ukrainian defense forces intercepted and destroyed all but 19 of the drones and only one missile managed to evade their air defense systems, the air force reported in its statement Monday.
Despite Ukraine’s success in shooting down the majority of the incoming threats, a military airbase located in Dubno—roughly 40 miles from Poland’s border—sustained damage. Yuriy Ihnat, spokesperson for Ukraine’s air force, confirmed to Reuters that this site had been the principal target of the Russian assault.
In response to the proximity of the strikes, Polish military jets, alongside aircraft from allied nations, were scrambled early Monday morning to secure the airspace of Poland, a NATO member. Poland’s armed forces issued a public statement outlining the precautionary action.
Russia’s Defense Ministry stated Monday that the intense offensive was a direct retaliation for recent Ukrainian attacks on Russian military installations earlier in the month.
“All designated targets” were hit, the ministry declared in its official announcement.
{Matzav.com}
Harav Ezriel Auerbach Accompanies Zkan Rosh Yeshiva Harav Shmuel Kamenetsky Home After Adirei HaTorah
WATCH THIS: A Monumental Simchas HaTorah: ALS Patient Reb Sruly Schubert Writes Sefer Using ONLY HIS EYES
Gov. Newsom Adds Fuel To Fire, Dares Trump’s Border Czar Tom Homan To Arrest Him Amid Violent Anti-ICE Riots
California Governor Gavin Newsom escalated an already heated standoff with the Trump administration by directly challenging the president’s immigration enforcement chief, Tom Homan, to detain him over his refusal to crack down on anti-ICE demonstrators in the state.
“Come after me. Arrest me. Let’s just get it over with, tough guy,” Newsom declared in a defiant interview with NBC News on Sunday.
His remarks came shortly after Homan warned that both Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass could be criminally liable for allegedly interfering with federal immigration operations across the city.
“I’ll say it about anybody,” Homan asserted during a weekend interview, as scenes of protest and unrest unfolded in Los Angeles.
“You cross that line, it’s a felony to knowingly harbor and conceal an illegal alien. It’s a felony to impede law enforcement doing their job.”
Amid growing tensions, President Trump announced plans to send 2,000 California National Guard troops to support federal immigration efforts in Los Angeles, where ICE agents have faced off with demonstrators for three consecutive days.
Newsom rejected the move, warning that the deployment would only heighten tensions on the ground. He also accused the Trump administration of weaponizing federal authority for political purposes.
“He’s a tough guy. Why doesn’t he do that? He knows where to find me,” Newsom said in the NBC interview.
“But you know what? Let your hands off 4-year-old girls that are trying to get educated. Let your hands off these poor people. They’re just trying to live their lives, man. Trying to live their lives, paying their taxes. Been here for 10 years. The fear, the horror.”
“The hell are they doing? These guys need to grow up. They need to stop, and we need to push back. And I’m sorry to be so clear, but that kind of bloviating is exhausting. So, Tom, arrest me. Let’s go,” he continued.
Homan, meanwhile, pushed back against the criticism and defended ICE’s recent actions, saying Newsom’s rhetoric undermined public safety.
“We’re arresting bad people. We’re enforcing laws and following up on a serious criminal investigation on cartel financing. So that’s exactly what ICE did. And ICE took a lot of bad people off the street that day,” he said on Fox News’ “Fox & Friends.”
“We arrested … gang members, arrested somebody that had an armed robbery conviction. So we made LA safer.”
“The men and women of ICE, the men and women of the border control made LA safer that day, but you’re not hearing any of this. All you hear is a rhetoric about ICE being racist and ICE being Nazis and terrorists — and Gov. Newsom feeds that,” Homan added.
In a countermove, Newsom announced plans to take legal action against the federal government over the troop deployment.
“They had to coordinate with the governor of the state,” he said.
“They never coordinated with the governor of the state.”
“This is about authoritarian tendencies. This is about command and control. This is about power. This is about ego,” Newsom concluded.
{Matzav.com}
Pages
