U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff revealed on Sunday that during President Donald Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Moscow accepted that Washington and its European partners could extend to Ukraine a form of protection similar to NATO’s Article 5 as part of an eventual agreement to end the war that has dragged on for three and a half years.
“We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO,” he said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” He added that it “was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that.”
At a press event in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen stood alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and declared that “we welcome President Trump’s willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. and the ‘Coalition of the willing’ — including the European Union — is ready to do its share.”
Offering an early glimpse into what was discussed at Friday’s summit in Alaska, Witkoff said the parties agreed on “robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing.” He explained that Russia pledged to put into law a commitment not to seek further territorial expansion in Ukraine.
Zelenskyy expressed gratitude to Washington for the indications that it is prepared to help provide security assurances, though he cautioned that the specifics are still missing.
“It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine,” he said, “But there are no details how it will work, and what America’s role will be, Europe’s role will be and what the EU can do, and this is our main task, we need security to work in practice like Article 5 of NATO, and we consider EU accession to be part of the security guarantees.”
Witkoff defended Trump’s decision not to push for an immediate ceasefire agreement from Russia, saying the president shifted focus to a broader peace framework because the negotiations had advanced significantly.
“We covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal,” Witkoff said, without elaborating.
“We began to see some moderation in the way they’re thinking about getting to a final peace deal,” he said.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized that if a ceasefire was not achieved, Trump had already made clear before the summit that there would be “additional consequences.” But he pointed out that any ceasefire arrangement could not have been struck since Ukraine was not present at the table.
“Now, ultimately, if there isn’t a peace agreement, if there isn’t an end of this war, the president’s been clear, there are going to be consequences,” Rubio said on ABC’s “This Week.” “But we’re trying to avoid that. And the way we’re trying to avoid those consequences is with an even better consequence, which is peace, the end of hostilities.”
Rubio, who also serves as Trump’s national security adviser, argued that new sanctions would not be the tool to bring Putin into line, though he did not rule them out completely. He stressed that “the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal.”
“The minute you issue new sanctions, your ability to get them to the table, our ability to get them to table will be severely diminished,” Rubio said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
He further cautioned that a final agreement was still far off.
“We’re not at the precipice of a peace agreement,” he said, adding that reaching such a deal would demand time and effort.
“We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remains some big areas of disagreement. So we’re still a long ways off,” Rubio said.
On Monday, Trump will host Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House for follow-up talks after his discussions with Putin. Witkoff said the atmosphere after Friday’s summit was optimistic.
“I think everybody agreed that we had made progress. Maybe not enough for a peace deal, but we are on the path for the first time,” Witkoff said.
He noted that the most contentious issue—territorial swaps—was not on the table in Alaska. “The fundamental issue, which is some sort of land swap, which is obviously ultimately in the control of the Ukrainians — that could not have been discussed at this meeting” with Putin. “We intend to discuss it on Monday. Hopefully we have some clarity on it and hopefully that ends up in a peace deal very, very soon.”
{Matzav.com}