Grand Jury Expected To Indict Ex-National Security Adviser John Bolton For Transmitting Classified Documents
A federal grand jury gathered Wednesday afternoon to deliberate whether to indict John Bolton, who served as national security adviser, on charges stemming from the alleged mishandling and transmission of classified information through a private email account.
The move follows a pair of FBI raids conducted two months earlier at Bolton’s residence in Maryland and his Washington, DC office, as investigators sought evidence related to what officials described as the unauthorized possession of “highly sensitive national security” materials.
Justice Department insiders told The Post that prosecutors expect charges to be filed as soon as Wednesday or Thursday. One official described the case against the 76-year-old as “air tight.”
According to sources who spoke to The NY Post in August, Bolton is suspected of using a personal AOL email address to send classified messages and maintain diary-like records of his daily briefings and observations throughout his tenure in President Trump’s first administration.
Court filings reveal that this private email account was later compromised by an unknown foreign hacker, according to a probable cause warrant unsealed last month. Officials believe that some of the top-secret information could have been accessed by foreign governments or hostile entities.
Details about the intrusion, including how it occurred or who was responsible, were redacted in the unsealed documents.
During the FBI’s search, agents allegedly uncovered additional classified materials, including papers involving weapons of mass destruction, strategic U.S. communications, diplomatic efforts at the United Nations, and confidential travel plans.
Even if Bolton did not deliberately share the information, prosecutors argue he could still face criminal liability if he stored classified materials in unsecured locations — a rule that would extend to the use of his personal email.
Investigators were also ordered to determine whether any malicious software had infiltrated Bolton’s electronic devices and to assess whether he had installed cybersecurity protections capable of detecting potential malware.
Authorities have not disclosed whether any such programs were located on his systems.
When Bolton was dismissed by President Trump in September 2019 after serving 17 months as national security adviser, he reportedly told officials that he “did not have any notes or other records from his government service,” according to court filings.
Those assurances began to unravel months later when the National Security Council received a manuscript of Bolton’s 2020 memoir, The Room Where It Happened, which the Trump administration alleged contained classified information.
“As written, the manuscript is very detailed, suggesting that it was likely produced from notes written by your client during his service at the White House,” Ellen J. Knight, then the NSC’s senior director for records, access, and information, wrote in a letter to Bolton’s lawyers.
A separate probe into Bolton’s email use was also launched that same year, though investigators say the inquiry was abruptly “shelved” under the Biden administration — a decision one FBI insider suggested may have been politically influenced, given Bolton’s outspoken criticism of Trump.
{Matzav.com}